Abstract
Stemming from our energy localization hypothesis that energy in general relativity is localized in the regions of the energy-momentum tensor, we had devised a test with the classic Eddington spinning rod. Consistent with the localization hypothesis, we found that the Tolman energy integral did not change in the course of the motion. This implied that gravitational waves do not carry energy in vacuum, bringing into question the demand for the quantization of gravity. Also if information is conveyed by the waves, the traditional view that information transfer demands energy is challenged. Later, we showed that the “body” angular momentum changed at a rate indicating that the moment of inertia increased to higher order, contrary to traditional expectations. We consider the challenges facing the development of a localized expression for the total angular momentum of the body including the contribution from gravity. We find that Komar's expression does not lead to an adequate formulation of localized angular momentum.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
F. I. Cooperstock, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 1531 (1999).
F. I. Cooperstock, Ann. Phys. 282, 115 (2000).
F. I. Cooperstock, Found. Phys. 22, 1011 (1992); in Topics in Quantum Gravity and Beyond: Papers in Honor of L. Witten, F. Mansouri and J. J. Scanio, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993), pp. 201–210; in Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology, J. Buitrago et al., eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), pp. 61–72.
A. S. Eddington, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 102, 268 (1922); The Mathematical Theory of Relativity (Cambridge Univ. Press., 1965; originally published in 1923), pp. 248–252.
R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology (Clarendon, Oxford, 1934).
F. I. Cooperstock, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 1107 (2000).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, New York, 1987).
N. Rosen and F. I. Cooperstock, Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 2657 (1992).
Nevertheless, the interest in the localization problem and the desire to elucidate the essential significance of the pseudotensor continued to attract a number of researchers through the years. The activity has intensified more recently. See, e.g., C. C. Chang, J. M. Nester, and C. M. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1897 (1999). K. S. Virbhadra, Phys. Rev. D 60, 104041 (1999). J.-M. Aguirregabiria, A. Chamorro, and K. S. Virbhadra, Gen. Rel. Grav. 28, 1393 (1996). R. Penrose, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 381, 53 (1982). F. I. Cooperstock and R. S. Sarracino, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 11, 877 (1978); 14, 181 (1981). C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Phys. Rev. 136, B571 (1964).
Latin indices range 0-3, Greek indices range 1-3, G=c=1. A semi-colon denotes covariant differentiation.
A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl. 688 (1916), B. 154 (1918).
F. I. Cooperstock and D. J. Booth, Nuov. Cim. 62B, 163 (1969).
It is easy to demonstrate that to the required order, the result is the same whether we use ℐik or T ik.
C. W. Misner, Phys. Rev. 130, 1590 (1963).
J. N. Winicour, in General Relativity and Gravitation, A. Held, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1980), pp. 71–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooperstock, F.I. Energy and Angular Momentum of Systems in General Relativity. Foundations of Physics 31, 1067–1082 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017526307292
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017526307292