Skip to main content
Log in

In Defense of Israel Scheffler's Conception of Moral Education

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Israel Scheffler views moral education as having two major objectives: inculcating minimum standards of decent conduct and developing rationality in moral deliberation and judgment. The latter is to be achieved by engaging students in discussions of moral issues in such a way that they come to appreciate and follow standards of rational deliberation and judgment – standards that Scheffler explicates primarily in terms of impartiality. This paper argues that the conception of rational moral deliberation and discussion underlying Scheffler's approach to moral education is inadequate, and suggests an alternative conception that gives far more prominence to the problem of interpreting the meaning of substantive moral concepts and determining how they apply to particular cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackerman, B.: 1989, 'Why Dialogue', The Journal of Philosophy LXXXVI, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K.: 1958, The Moral Point of View, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J.R.: 1980, 'Validating Moral Judgments by Principle Testing', in D. Cochrane and M. Manley Casimir (eds.) Development of Moral Reasoning, Praeger, New York, pp. 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R.: 1977, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R.: 1986, Law's Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W.: 1963, Ethics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M.: 1965, Freedom and Reason, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1986, Change in View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A.: 1967, 'Philosophy of Law', in P. Edwards (ed.) Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 6, Macmillan, New York, pp. 264–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. and Toulmin, S.: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry, University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovesi, J.: 1967, Moral Notions, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, E.: 1949, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, Y.Y.: 1994, Teaching Moral Concepts: A New Conception, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H.: 1972, Wittgenstein and Justice, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I.: 1973, Reason and Teaching, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, I.: 1991, In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.: 1963, Generalization in Ethics, Eyre & Spottiswoode, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J.D.: 1988, Moral Relevance and Moral Conflict, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, E.: 1993, 'From Kantianism to Contextualism: The Rise and Fall of the Paradigm Theory in Bioethics', in E. Winkler and J. Coombs (eds.) Applied Ethics: A Reader, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 343–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coombs, R.J. In Defense of Israel Scheffler's Conception of Moral Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16, 175–187 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004963424364

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004963424364

Keywords

Navigation