Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Must There Be a Balance of Nature?

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The balance of nature concept is an old idea that manifests itself in anumber of forms in population and community ecology. This paper focuseson population ecology, where controversy surrounding the balance ofnature takes the form of perennial debates over the significance ofdensity dependence, population regulation, and species interactions suchas competition. One of the most striking features of these debates, overthe course of the previous century in ecology, is the tendency to arguethe case on largely conceptual grounds. This paper explores twoquestions. Why this tendency to settle on conceptual grounds what is soobviously an empirical issue? Are there any good conceptual arguments tobe had in this area?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrewartha, H.G.: 1957, ‘The Use of Conceptual Models in Population Ecology', Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22, 219-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrewartha, H.G. andBirch, L.C.: 1954, The Distribution and Abundance of Animals, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrewartha, H.G. andBirch, L.C.: 1984, The Ecological Web, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: 1944, ‘British Ecological Society Symposium on “The Ecology of Closely Allied Species”’, Journal of Animal Ecology 13, 176-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1995, ‘The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis', in G. Wolters andJ.G. Lennox (eds), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 45-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A.A.: 1987, ‘Equilibrium or Nonequilibrium: Is That the Question?', Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 68, 500-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A.A.: 1991, ‘Stabilization or Regulation:What it All Means!’, Oecologia 86, 140-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D.B.: 1990, Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. andRausher, M.D.: 1996, ‘Testing Adaptationism: A Comment on Orzack and Sober', American Naturalist 148, 189-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H.: 1995, Macroecology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccino, N.: 1995, ‘Novel Approaches to the Study of Population Dynamics', in N. Cappuccino andP.W. Price (eds), Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccino, N. andPrice, P.W. (eds): 1995, Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H.: 1978, ‘Predator-mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model', American Naturalist 112, 127-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H.: 1988, ‘Theory and Models in Ecology: A Different Perspective', Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 69, 102-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P.L.: 1981, ‘Models for Spatially Distributed Populations: The Effect of Withinpatch Variability', Theoretical Population Biology 19, 288-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P.L.: 1982, ‘The Stabilizing Effect of a Random Environment', Journal of Mathematical Biology 15, 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P.L. andCase, T.J.: 1986, ‘Overview: Nonequilibrium Community Theories: Chance, Variability, History, and Coexistence', in J. Diamond andT. Case (eds), pp. 229-239.

  • Chitty, D.: 1996, Do Lemmings Commit Suicide? Beautiful Hypotheses and Ugly Facts, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology: 1957, Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography, No. 22, The Biological Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R.K.: 1984, ‘What& New? Community Ecology Discovers Biology', in P.W. Price,C.N. Slobodchikoff andW.S. Gaud (eds), A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 387-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H.: 1990, “Apparent Versus “Real” Competition in Plants', in J.B. Grace andD. Tilman (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 9-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. andSousa, W.P.: 1983, ‘On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence', The American Naturalist 121, 789-824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, E.F. andSimberloff, D.: 1986, ‘Competition, Scientific Method, and Null Models in Ecology', American Scientist 74, 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G.: 1990, ‘The Explanatory Tools of Theoretical Population Biology', in A. Fine,M. Forbes andL. Wessels (eds), PSA 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 165-178.

  • Cooper, G.: 1993, ‘The Competition Controversy in Community Ecology', Biology and Philosophy 8, 359-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G.: 1997, ‘Theoretical Modeling and Biological Laws', in L. Darden (ed.), PSA 1996, Supplement to Philosophy of Science, 63: 28-35.

  • Cooper, G.: 1998, ‘Generalizations in Ecology: A Philosophical Taxonomy', Biology and Philosophy 13, 555-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G.: forthcoming, The Science of the Struggle for Existence: On the Foundations of Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Costanza, R. andMaxwell, T.: 1994, ‘Resolution and Predictability: An Approach to the Scaling Problem', Landscape Ecology 9, 47-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, D. L. andWaterhouse, J.C.: 1987, ‘Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Concepts in Ecological Models', Ecological Monographs 57, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Boer, P.J.: 1968, ‘Spreading the Risk and Stabilization of Animal Numbers’, Acta Biotheoretica 18, 165-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Boer, P.J.: 1986, ‘The Present Status of the Competitive Exclusion Principle', Trends in Evolutionary Ecology 1, 25-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Boer, P.J. andReddingius, J.: 1996, Regulation and Stabilitzation Paradigms in Population Ecology, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, B. andTaper, B.: 1994, ‘Density Dependence in Time Series Observation of Natural Populations: Estimation and Testing', Ecological Monographs 64, 205-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. andCase, T. (eds): 1986, Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1957, ‘Discussion', from H.G. Andrewartha, ‘The Use of Conceptual Models in Population Ecology', Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, p. 235.

  • Egerton, F.N.: 1973, ‘Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature', The Quarterly Review of Biology 48, 322-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.: 1933, The Ecology of Animals, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F.S.: 1980, ‘The Equilibrium Theory of Island Geography: Fact or Fiction', Journal of Biogeography 7, 209-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I.: 1990, ‘Density Dependence, Regulation, and Variability in Animal Populations', in M.P. Hassell andR.M. May (eds), Population Regulation and Dynamics, The Royal Society, London, pp. 141-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I.: 1991a, ‘Single-species Metapopulation Dynamics: Concepts, Models and Observations’, in M. Gilpin andI. Hanski (eds), Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations, Academic Press, London, pp. 17-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I.: 1991b, ‘Metapopulation Dynamics: Brief History and Conceptual Domain', Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 3-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I.: 1996, ‘Metapopulation Ecology', in O.E. Rhodes, Jr.,R.K. Chesser andM.H. Smith (eds), Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 13-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., I. Woiwod andJ. Perry: 1993, ‘Density Dependence, Population Persistence, and Largely Futile Arguments', Oecologia 95, 595-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. andGilpin, M.E.: 1997, Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S.: 1991, ‘Local Extinction in a Metapopulation Context: An Empirical Evaluation', Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 73-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, M. andLawton, J.H.: 1993, ‘Comments Arising from a Paper by Wolda and Dennis: Using and Interpreting the Results of Tests for Density Dependence', Oecologia 95, 592-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, L.O. andFiske, W.F.: 1911, The Importation into the United States of the Parasites of the Gipsy Moth and the Brown-Tail Moth. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology, Bulletin No. 91. Reprinted: 1977), Arno Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M.D. andPrice, P.W.: 1998, ‘Cycles in Insect Populations: Delayed Density Dependence or Exogenous Driving Variables?’ Ecological Entomology 23, 216-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E.: 1948, ‘Circular Causal Systems in Ecology', Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 50, 221-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S.: 1985, Modeling Nature. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S.: 1995, Modeling Nature, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D.L.: 1954, The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos andA. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 91-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M.: 1973, Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M.: 1986, ‘The Search for Patterns in the Balance of Nature: Advances and Retreats', Ecology 67, 1115-1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, R.P.: 1987, ‘Pluralism in Ecology', Annual Review of Ecological Systems 18, 321-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: 1992, ‘Community Regulation: UnderWhat Conditions Are Bottom-Up Factors Important on Rocky Shores?’ Ecology 73, 755-765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W.W.: 1994, ‘Population Regulation in Theory and Practice', Ecology 75, 271-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B.G.: 1982, ‘On the Meaning of Density Dependence', Oecologia 53, 370-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B.G.: 1987, ‘The Calculation of the Rate of Increase, R, of Populations with Heterogeneous Life Histories', Oikos 50, 262-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B.G.: 1998, ‘Can the Population Regulation Controversy Be Buried and Forgotten?’ Oikos 84, 148-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J.: 1933, ‘The Balance of Animal Populations', Journal of Animal Ecology 2, 132-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J.: 1954, ‘An Outline of the Dynamics of Animal Populations', Australian Journal of Zoology 2, 9-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J.: 1957, ‘Discussion', from L.C. Birch, ‘The Role of Weather in Determining the Distribution and Abundance of Animals', Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22, 216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J.: 1960, ‘The Role of Population Dynamics in Natural Selection', in S. Tax (ed.), Evolution After Darwin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J. andBailey, V.A.: 1935, The Balance of Animal Populations, Zoological Society of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H.: 1962, ‘Natural Selection and Ecological Theory', The American Naturalist 46, 257-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, S.H. andSober, E.: 1994, ‘Optimality Models and the Test of Adaptationism', American Naturalist 143, 361-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A.,Kolasa, J. andJones, C.G.: 1994, Ecological Understanding, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P.W.: 1984, ‘Alternative Paradigms in Community Ecology', in P.W. Price,C.N. Slobodchikoff andW.S. Gaud (eds), pp. 354-383.

  • Price, P.W.,Slobodchikoff, C.N. andGaud, W.S.: 1984, A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P.W. andHunter, M.D.: 1995, ‘Novelty and Synthesis in the Development of Population Dynamics', in N. Cappuccino andP.W. Price (eds), pp. 389-413.

  • Reddingius, J.: 1971, ‘Gambling for Existence: A Discussion of Some Theoretical Problems in Animal Populations Ecology', Acta Biotheoretica 20 (suppl.), 1-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. D.,Ayres, M.P. andLorio, P.L. Jr.: 1995, ‘Host Sustainability, Predation, and Bark Beetle Population Dynamics', in N. Cappuccino andP.W. Price (eds), pp. 339-358.

  • Resetarits, W.J., Jr andBernardo, J.: 1998, Experimental Ecology: Issues and Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.L.: 1980, ‘The Organismic Community: Resilience of an Embattled Ecological Concept', BioScience 30, 465-471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.E.: 2000, ‘Density Dependence, Evolutionary Optimization, and the Diversification of Avian Life Histories', The Condor 102, 9-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J.S.D.,May, R.M. andLevin, S.A. (eds): 1989, Perspectives in Ecological Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T.: 1992, Analytical Population Dynamics, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, B. andKeddy, P.A.: 1987, ‘The Individualistic and Community-Unit Concepts as Falsifiable Hypotheses', Vegetatio 69, 47-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, B. andPeters, R.H.: 1991, ‘The Seduction by Mechanism: A Reply to Tilman', The American Naturalist 138, 1276-1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.S.: 1989, ‘Idealized Laws, Antirealism, and Applied Science: A Case in Hydrogeology', Synthese 81, 329-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.S. andMcCoy, E.D.: 1993, Method in Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D.R.: 1984a, ‘Density-Vague Ecology and Liberal Population Regulation in Insects', in P.W. Price,C.N. Slobodchikoff and W.S. Gaud (eds), A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 313-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D.R.: 1984b, ‘Natural Variability and the Manifold Mechanisms of Ecological Communities', in G.W. Salt (ed.), Ecology and Evolutionary Biology: A Round Table on Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 56-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D.R.: 1986, ‘Density Vagueness: Abiding the Variance in the Demography of Real Populations', in J. Diamond andT. Case (eds), Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 257-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W.R.: 1939, ‘Biological Control and the Theories of the Interaction of Populations', Parasitology 31, 299-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D.: 1989, ‘Discussion: Population Dynamics and Species Interactions', in J.S.D. Roughgarden,R.M. May andS.A. Levin (eds), Perspectives in Ecological Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 89-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D.: 1991, ‘The Schism between Theory and Ardent Empiricism: A Reply to Shipley and Peters', The American Naturalist 138, 1283-1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D.: 1993, ‘Community Diversity and Succession: The Roles of Competition, Dispersal, and Habitat Modification', in E.D. Schulze andH.A. Mooney (eds), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 328-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. andKareiva, P.: 1997, Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, Monographs in Population Biology, No. 30, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P.: 1995, ‘Population Regulation: Old Arguments and a New Synthesis', in N. Cappuccino andP.W. Price (eds), Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 19-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P.: 1999, ‘Population Regulation: A Synthetic View', Oikos 84, 153-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P.,Getz, W.M.,Taneyhill, D.E. andGinzburg, L.: 1993, ‘The Logistic Equation Revisited: Final Installment,’ in ‘Letters to the Editor', Trends in Environmental Ecology 8, 68-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. andBerryman, A.A.: 2000, ‘Detecting Cycles and Delayed Density Dependence: A Comment on Hunter and Price (1998)', Ecological Entomology 25, 119-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G.H. andPatterson, H.E.H.: 1995, ‘Levels of Understanding in Ecology: Interspecific Competition and Community Ecology', Australian Journal of Ecology 20, 463-466.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T.C.R.: 1993, The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1992, ‘“Gaia,” Nature Worship and Biocentric Fallacies', The Quarterly Review of Biology 67, 479-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1989, ‘Reviving the Superorganism', Journal of Theoretical Biology 136, 337-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.: 1999, 'To Be Continued ...', Biology and Philosophy 14, 615-619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1980, ‘Randomness and Perceived-Randomness in Evolutionary Theory', in E. Saarinen (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Ecology, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 279-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H.: 1989, ‘The Equilibrium Concept and Density Dependence Tests:What Does It All Mean?’ Oecologia 81, 430-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H.: 1991, ‘The Usefulness of the Equilibrium Concept in Population Dynamics', Oecologia 86, 144-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H.,Dennis, B. andTaper, M.L.: 1994, Density Dependent Tests, and Largely Futile Comments: Answers to Holyoak and Lawton (1993) and Hanski, Woiwod and Perry (1993)', Oecologia 98, 229-234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, 24450-0303, USA

    Gregory Cooper

Authors
  1. Gregory Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, G. Must There Be a Balance of Nature?. Biology & Philosophy 16, 481–506 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011935220219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011935220219

Search

Navigation