Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What’s Wrong with Tonk(?)

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, A. and Belnap, N. (1975) Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, J. and Ripley, D. (2004) Analetheism and dialetheism, Analysis 64, 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (1962) Tonk, plonk and plink, Analysis 22, 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G. (1979) Logic of paradox, J. Philos. Logic 8, 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A. N. (1960) The runabout inference ticket, Analysis 21, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1936) On the concept of logical consequence, in Tarski (1983), pp. 409–420.

  • Tarski, A. (1983) Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, N. (1996) The law of excluded middle is synthetic a priori, if valid, Philos. Topics 24, 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Villanova University, USA and The University of St. Andrews, Scotland, UK

    Roy T. Cook

Authors
  1. Roy T. Cook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, R.T. What’s Wrong with Tonk(?). J Philos Logic 34, 217–226 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-004-7805-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-004-7805-x

Search

Navigation