Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T15:50:33.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematical Proof and Experimental Proof

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Arthur H. Copeland Sr.
Arthur H. Copeland Sr.*
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In studies of scientific methodology, surprisingly little attention has been given to tests of hypotheses. Such testing constitutes a methodology common to various scientific disciplines and is an essential factor in the development of science since it determines which theories are retained. The classical theory of tests is a major accomplishment but requires modification in order to produce a theory that accounts for the success of science. The revised theory is an analysis of the nondeductive aspect of scientific reasoning. It results in a new definition of probability and a nonclassical point of view with regard to the foundations of probability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 303 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bernoulli, Jacob, Ars Conjectandi Basileœ (1713).Google Scholar
[2] Braithwaite, R. B., Scientific Explanation, Cambridge (1955).Google Scholar
[3] Brunk, H. D., An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Boston (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Burks, Arthur W., “A Pragmatic-Human Theory of Probability,” in The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis, edited by P. A. Schilpp (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[5] Carnap, Rudolf, Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago (1950).Google Scholar
[6] Carnap, Rudolf, “The Two Concepts of Probability,” Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, New York (1953), 438–455.Google Scholar
[7] Church, Alonzo, “On the Concept of Random Sequence,” Bulletin American Soc. Vol. 46, No. 2, 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Copeland, A. H. Sr., “Statistical Induction and the Foundations of Probability I and II,” Theoria, Vol. XXVII (1962).Google Scholar
[9] Cramer, H., Elements of the Theory of Probability, New York, (1956).Google Scholar
[10] DeFinetti, Bruno, “Sul Significato Della Probibilita,” Fund. Math. Vol. 17, 299–329.Google Scholar
[11] DeFinetti, Bruno, “La Logique de la Probabilité,” Actes Congress Inst. de Phil. Soc., Paris (1932, 1936).Google Scholar
[12] DeFinetti, Bruno, “La Prevision, ses Lois Logique, ses Sources Subjective,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare (1936) 1–68.Google Scholar
[13] Frank, Philipp, Philosophy of Science, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1957).Google Scholar
[14] Hume, David, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Chicago (1949). Originally published under the title Philosophical essays.Google Scholar
[15] Keynes, John Maynard, A Treatise on Probability, London, New York (1929).Google Scholar
[16] Kolmogoroff, A., “Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung,” Erg. Math. 2, No. 3 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Nagel, Ernest, Principles of the Theory of Probability, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1, part 2, 341–422.Google Scholar
[18] Neyman, Jerzy and Pearson, E. S., “On the Problem of Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses,” Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Series A231 (1933) 289–337.Google Scholar
[19] Popper, Karl R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Popper, Karl R., “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability,” British Jour. of the Phil. of Sci. Vol. X, No. 37, 25–42.Google Scholar
[21] Reichenbach, Hans, Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre, eine Untersuchung über die Logischen und Mathematischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Leiden (1935).Google Scholar
[22] Reichenbach, Hans, “The Logical Foundations of the Concept of Probability,” Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, New York (1953).Google Scholar
[23] Savage, L. J., Foundations of Statistics, New York (1933).Google Scholar
[24] Venn, John, The Logic of Chance, London, New York (1866).Google Scholar
[25] Vietoris, L., “Häufigkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit,” Studium Gen. 0, 85–96.Google Scholar
[26] v. Mises, Richard, “Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung,” Math. Zeitschr. Band 5, 52–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] v. Mises, Richard, Probability, Statistics and Truth, New York (1939).Google Scholar
[28] Wald, Abraham, Sequential Analysis, New York, London (1947).Google Scholar