Event Abstract

Effects of acute ketamine infusion on visual working memory encoding: a study using ERPs

  • 1 City University London, Psychology, UK
  • 2 Institute of Psychiatry, UK
  • 3 University of Manchester, School of Psychological Sciences, UK
  • 4 University of Manchester, Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, UK

The impairment of working memory (WM) is regarded as a central deficit in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We have previously demonstrated a relationship between EEG measures of visual stimulus encoding and WM performance in schizophrenia. Specifically, we examined the early visual P1 and the later occurring P3 ERP component. Both ERPs were attenuated in participants with schizophrenia. However, the P1 was predictive of WM performance in healthy controls. The findings emphasise the importance of visual encoding anomalies in explaining WM deficits in schizophrenia. These information processing abnormalities have been suggested to be the result of a NMDA glutamate receptor abnormality. Ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA antagonist, can be used to explore the neurophysiological characteristics of acutely induced glutamate receptor dysfunction in healthy volunteers. In this study, we aimed to test whether the administration of IV ketamine can replicate the cognitive and electrophysiological patterns that our group previously observed in schizophrenia patients and schizotypal individuals. 44 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive IV infusion of ketamine or placebo. A 64 channel EEG was used to obtain event-related potentials in response to a delayed discrimination working memory (WM) task. The two groups were compared in respect to their performance task as well as the amplitude of the P1 and P300 ERPs. The psychiatric scales scores (BPRS, CADSS) were significantly increased in the ketamine group when compared to saline. While there was no difference in terms of reaction times to the task, accuracy in the ketamine group worsened significantly with increase in working memory load than in controls. Ketamine significantly increased the P1 but lead to a decrease in P300. In this study acute NMDA antagonism induced a WM deficit that was associated with visual processing and memory abnormalities. Specifically, ketamine increased the amplitude of the P1 potential and reduced the P300 amplitude. In addition P1 but not P300 predicted performance on the WM task. These effects could be mediated ketamine-induced acute glutamate release in the visual cortex, enhancing neuronal responses to visual stimuli and increasing the signal-to-noise ratio which in turn disrupted higher order cognitive function.

Keywords: Ketamine, working memory, ERPs, visual encoding, NMDA model of schizophrenia

Conference: XII International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON-XII), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 27 Jul - 31 Jul, 2014.

Presentation Type: Oral Presentation

Topic: Memory and Learning

Citation: Haenschel C, Koychev I, El-Deredy W and Deakin B (2015). Effects of acute ketamine infusion on visual working memory encoding: a study using ERPs. Conference Abstract: XII International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON-XII). doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2015.217.00029

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 19 Feb 2015; Published Online: 24 Apr 2015.

* Correspondence: Dr. Corinna Haenschel, City University London, Psychology, London, UK, Corinna.Haenschel.1@city.ac.uk