Abstract
This article seeks to identify, theoretically,some broad ethical issues about the type ofspace which the Internet is becoming, issueswhich are closely linked to developing newagendas for empirical research into Internetuse. It seeks to move away from the concept of'digital divide' which has dominated debate inthis area while presuming a rather staticnotion of the space which the Internet is, orcould become. Instead, it draws on deliberativedemocracy theory in general and John Dryzek'sconcept of 'discursive design' in particular toformulate six types of issue (Convergence, WhoConverges?, Deliberation, Public Action,Relations to the State, and Long-term Patternsof Practice) around which both empiricalresearch and ethical debate can focus, andwhich taken together will help answer whetherthe Internet is, or can be, in part a'discursive design' which contributes to theconditions of democratic public life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seyla Benhabib, editor, Democracy and Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995.
Craig Calhoun, editor, Habermas and the Public Sphere. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
Manuel Castells. The Internet Galaxy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
The Children's Partnership. Online Context for Low-Income and Underserved Americans. Accessed from http://www.childrenspartnership.org/ 7 June 2001.
Commonwealth Telecommunications Organisation. Information and Communication Technologies in the Commonwealth. Report for the Commonwealth ICT Expert Group, London, 2001.
John Dryzek. Discursive Democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.
Nina Eliasoph. Avoiding Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
Oscar Gandy. The Real Digital Divide. In Leah Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone, editors, Handbook of New Media. Sage, London and Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.
Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastruture, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Routledge, London, 2001.
Jurgen Habermas. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Polity, Cambridge, 1989.
Jurgen Habermas. Between Facts and Norms. MIT Pres, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
James Katz, Ronald Rice and Philip Apsden. The Internet, 1995–2000: Access, Civic Involvement and Social Interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3): 405–419.
Rob Kling. Can the “Next-Generation Internet” Effectively Support “Ordinary Citizens”? The Information Society, 15: 57–63, 1999.
Lawrence Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books, New York, 1999.
Robin Mansell and Roger Silverstone. Introduction. In Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
Daniel Miller and Don Slater. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Berg, Oxford, 2000.
Dan Thu Nguyen and Jon Alexander. The Coming of Cyberspacetime and the End of the Polity. In Rob Shields, editor, Cultures of the Internet. Sage, London and Thousand Oaks, 1996.
Pippa Norris, Digital Divide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
OECD. Report of Joint OECD/UN/UNDP/World Bank Global Forum, Exploiting the Digital Opportunities for Poverty Reduction. OECD, 2001. Accessed from http://www.oecd.org/dac/digitalforum/ 1 April 2001.
Pew Internet and American Life Project. The Broadband Difference, 2002. Accessed from http://www.pewinternet.org/ October 2002.
Anne Phillips. Which Equalities Matter? Polity, Cambridge, 1999.
Mark Poster. Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere. In David Porter, editor, Internet Culture. Routledge, New York, 1997.
Ronald Rice, Primary Issues in Internet Use. In Leah Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone, editors, Handbook of New Media, pp. 105–129. Sage, London and Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.
Richard Sennett. The Fall of PublicMan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977.
Peter Stallybrass and Allon White. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Methuen, London, 1986.
Cass Susstein, Republic.com. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999.
David Trend, Welcome to Cyberschool. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MA, 2001.
UK Cabinet Office. Closing the Digital Divide: Information and Communication Technologies in Deprived Areas. London, 2000. Accessed from http://www.pat15.org.uk/ download.htm, 1 April 2001.
UK Government, Office of the e-Envoy. In the Service of Democracy. HM Government, London, 2002.
US Department of Commerce. Falling Through the Net: Towards Digital Inclusion-a Report on Americans' Access to Technology Tools. Washington, DC, October 2000. Accessed from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttnoo/ Frontoo.htm, 1 April 2001.
Barry Wellman et al. Does the Internet Increase, Decrease or Suplement Social Capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3): 436–455, 2001.
World Economic Forum. From the Global Digital Divide tothe Global Digital Opportunity. Report to the G-8 Kyushu-Okinawa Summit. Accessed from http://www.wetforum.org/digitaldivide.nsf/ 1 April 2001.
Robert Wuthnow. Communities of Discourse. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Couldry, N. Digital divide or discursive design? On the emerging ethics of information space. Ethics and Information Technology 5, 89–97 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024916618904
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024916618904