Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Secondary Data in Business Ethics Research

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relatively recent increase in empirical research conducted in business ethics has been accompanied by a growing literature which addresses its present shortcomings and continuing challenges. Particular attention has been focused on the difficulties of obtaining valid and reliable primary data. However, little or no attention has been paid to the use of secondary data. The aim of this paper is to stimulate the interest of business ethics researchers in using secondary data, either as a substitute or complement for primary data, bearing in mind both the benefits and shortcomings of doing so. It is suggested that secondary data not only offer advantages in terms of cost and effort, as conventionally described in research methods books, but also that in certain cases their use may overcome some of the difficulties that particularly afflict business ethics researchers in the gathering of primary data. In order to help business ethicists respond to this call for greater consideration of the potential offered by secondary data, the wide variety of forms that such data may take is indicated and a number of themes regarding their use discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-khalik, A. R.: 1984, ‘A Note on the Validity of the WSJ as a Source of “Events” Dates’, Journal of Accounting Research 22(2), 758–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P. and C. J. Cowton: 1993, ‘The Ethical Investor: Exploring Dimensions of Investment Behaviour’, Journal of Economic Psychology 14(2), 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, W. A.: 1994, ‘Creating and Using Vignettes to Teach Business Ethics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 3(3), 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, W. A.: 1995, ‘Ethical Problems in Ethics Research’, Business Ethics: A European Review 4(1), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beliveau, B., M. Cottrill and H. M. O'Neill: 1994,’ Predicting Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Model Drawn from Three Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(9), 731–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N. and M. J. Hatch: 1992, ‘General Causal Models in Business Ethics: An Essay on Colliding Research Traditions’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(4), 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigley, S.: 1995, ‘Business Ethics Research: A Cultural Perspective’, Business Ethics: A European Review 4(1), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A.: 1989, Research Methods and Organization Studies(Unwin Hyman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J. (n.d.), A Study of the Disclosure of Charitable Donations by Companies in the United Kingdom(Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London).

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1990a, ‘Bankers to Charity’, International Journal of Bank Marketing 8(1), 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1990b, ‘Where Their Treasure Is: Anglican Religious Communities and Ethical Investment’, Crucible(April-June), pp. 51–58.

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1991, ‘Company Size as a Dimension of Ethical Investment’, in B. Harvey, H. J. L. van Luijk and G. Corbetta (eds.), Market Morality and Company Size(Kluwer, Dordrecht), 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1992, ‘The Ethics of Advertising: Do Investors Care?’, International Journal of Advertising 11(2), 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1993, ‘Peace Dividends: The Exclusion of Military Contractors from Investment Portfolios’, Journal of Peace Research 30(1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzger: 1992, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation, & Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Response Technique (RRT)’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. N. III, D. L. Worrell and C. I. Lee: 1994, ‘Stock Market Reactions to Announced Corporate Illegalities’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(12), 979–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, R. S. and L. D. Lerner: 1994, ‘Pollution, Profits, and Stakeholders: The Constraining Effect of Economic Performance on CEO Concern with Stakeholder Expectations’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(9), 701–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., R. Thorpe and A. Lowe: 1991, Management Research: An Introduction(Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falush, P.: 1977, ‘Trends in the Finance of British Charities’, National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review(May), 32–44.

  • Fernandes, M. F. and D. M. Randall: 1992, ‘The Nature of the Social Desirability Response Effects in Ethics Research’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J.: 1990, ‘A Survey and Critique of Business Ethics Research, 1986’, in W. C. Frederick and L. E. Preston (eds.), Business Ethics: Research Issues and Empirical Studies(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and D. Nachmias: 1992, Research Methods in the Social Sciences, Fourth Edition (Edward Arnold, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1992a, ‘The Empirical Quest for Normative Meaning: Introduction and Overview’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1992b, ‘Whither Method? And Why?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 245–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood, R. D. and A. B. Carroll: 1991, ‘Assessment of Ethical Performance of Organization Members: A Conceptual Framework’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 667–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowler, D. and K. Legge: 1986, ‘Images of Employees in Company Reports - Do Company Chairmen View their Most Valuable Asset As Valuable?’, Personnel Review 15(5), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C.: 1982, Secondary Analysis in Social Research: A Guide to Data Sources and Methods with Examples(George Allen & Unwin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakin, C.: 1987, Research Design: Strategies and Choices in the Design of Social Research(Unwin Hyman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., F. L. Schmidt and G. R. Jackson: 1982, Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies(Sage, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D.: 1979, ‘Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action’, Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4), 602–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q., Jr.: 1994, ‘Correlates of Organizational Effectiveness: A Multilevel Analysis of a Multidimensional Outcome’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology(Sage, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulka, R. A.: 1982, ‘Idiosyncrasy and Circumstance: Choices and Constraints in the Research Process’, in J. E. McGrath, J. Martin and R. E. Kulka (eds.), Judgment Calls in Research(Sage, Beverly Hills), pp. 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. W.: 1985, ‘An Analysis of Complaints About Advertising’, International Journal of Advertising 4(4), 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. M.: 1992, ‘Exploring Ethical Issues Using Personal Interviews’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, S. and K. Stevens: 1994, ‘The FASB's Cost/Benefit Constraint in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(3), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.: 1982, ‘A Garbage Can Model of the Research Process’, in J. E. McGrath, J. Martin and R. E. Kulka (eds.), Judgment Calls in Research(Sage, Beverly Hills), pp. 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. C.: 1991, Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, Fifth Edition (Sage, Newbury Park).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, B.: 1973, Charities(Allen Lane, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N.: 1991, ‘The Sociology of Knowledge: Toward an Existential View of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(10), 787–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N.: 1992, ‘Understanding Ethics in Practice: An Ethnomethodological Approach to the Study of Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, P. and A. Rappaport: 1977, ‘Information Inductance and its Significance for Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations & Society 2(1), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and M. F. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(11), 805– 817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990,’ Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C.: 1993, ‘Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 12(8), 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, N. O., A. B. Collins and M. McCulloch: 1994, ‘The Ethics of Business Intelligence’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(4), 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenfield, B.: 1969, Company Giving, PEP Broadsheet No. 511 (Political and Economic Planning, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M.: 1994, ‘Defining Privacy in Employee Health Screening Cases: Ethical Ramifications Concerning the Employee/Employer Relationship’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(5), 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W.: 1984, Secondary Research: Information Sources and Methods(Sage, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S. and R. L. Simerly: 1994, ‘The Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Social Performance: An Interdisciplinary Examination’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(12), 959–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. C.: 1975, ‘Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks?’, Management Review 64, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. and K. Weick: 1979, ‘Unobtrusive Measures in Organizational Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly 22(4), 650–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz and L. Sechrest: 1977, ‘The Use of Archival Sources in Social Research’, in M. Bulmer (ed.), Sociological Research Methods: An Introduction(Macmillan, London), pp. 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1992, ‘Scenarios in Business Ethics Research: Review, Critical Assessment, and Recommendations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P.: 1985, Basic Content Analysis(Sage, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K.: 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Revised Edition (Sage, Newbury Park).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowton, C.J. The Use of Secondary Data in Business Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 423–434 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005730825103

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005730825103

Keywords

Navigation