Skip to main content
Log in

The new B-Theory's tu quoque argument

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adams, R. M. and H.-N. Castañeda: 1983, ‘Knowledge and Self: A Correspondence between R. M. Adams and H.-N. Castañeda’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almog, J., J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.): 1989, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böer, S. and W. Lycan: 1980, ‘Who Me?’, Philosophical Review 89, 427–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, R.: 1966, ‘Propositions’, in R. Butter (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H.-N.: 1969, ‘On the Phenomeno-Logic of the I’, in Akten des XIV Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie 3, University of Vienna Press, Vienna, pp. 206–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H.-N.: 1983, ‘Reply to Ernest Sosa: Self-Reference and Propositions’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H.-N.: 1990, ‘Indexicality: The Transparent Subjective Mechanism for Encountering a World’, Nous 24, 723–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.: 1981, The First Person, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.: 1989, ‘Why Singular Propositions?’ in Almog (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. L.: 1991, Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: The Coherence of Theism: Omniscience, Studies in Intellectual History vol. 19, E. J. Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. L.: 1996, ‘Tense and the New B-Theory of Language’, Philosophy 71, 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell Smith, J.: 1989, ‘Russell on Indexicals and Scientific Knowledge’, in C. Wade Savage and C. Anthony Andersen (eds.), Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science vol. 12. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1977, ‘Thoughts’, in P. T. Geach and R. H. Stoothoff (eds.), Logical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1979, ‘The Logic of Demonstratives’, in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Langauge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals’, in Almog (1989), pp. 481–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1989a, ‘Afterthoughts’, in 565–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvanig, J. L.: 1986, The Possibility of an All-knowing God, St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W.: 1994, Personal Communication of July 18.

  • Madell, G.: 1988, Mind and Materialism, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madell, G.: 1981, The Identity of the Self, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. M. E.: 1927, in C. D. Broad (ed.), The Nature of Existence, 2 vols., reprinted 1968, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1981, Real Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander, N.: 1991, ‘A Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Quarterly 41, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1979, ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs 13, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1988, ‘Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference’, Noûs 22, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F.: 1990, ‘Direct Reference, Meaning, and Thought’, Noûs 24, 697–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, M.: 1981, ‘Temporalism and Eternalism’, Philosophical Studies 39, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1948, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N.: 1989, ‘Tense and Singular Propositions’, in Almog (1989), pp. 331–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q.: 1987, ‘Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Studies 52, 371–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q.: 1993, Language and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E.: 1983, ‘Consciousness of the Self and of the Present’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R.: 1990, ‘Tensed Facts’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, H.: 1986, ‘Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?’, Journal of Philosophy 8, 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yourgrau, P.: 1982, ‘Frege, Perry and Demonstratives’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12, 725–752.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craig, W.L. The new B-Theory's tu quoque argument. Synthese 107, 249–269 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413608

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413608

Navigation