Abstract
This paper aims to make an empirically informed analytical contribution to the development of a more socially embedded bioethics. Drawing upon 10 interviews with cutting edge stem cell researchers (5 scientists and 5 clinicians) it explores and illustrates the ways in which the role positions of translational researchers are shaped by the ‘normative structures’ of science and medicine respectively and in combination. The empirical data is used to illuminate three overlapping themes of ethical relevance: what matters in stem cell research, experimental treatment, and responsible claim making (as contrasted with ‘hype’. Finally, we suggest that this kind of ‘descriptive’ ethical analysis has potential relevance for understanding other substantive areas of stem cell ethics in practice, and we briefly consider the questions our analysis raises about role positions and ethical agency, and the implications for bioethics as a field of scholarship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayliss, F.: 2006, Ethics, Embryos and the Art of Finesse. Paper given at The International Society for Stem Cell␣Research (ISSCR), 4th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada (29 June–1 July)
Castells M. (2004) The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Northampton: Edward Edgar
Cribb A. (2005) Health and the Good Society: Setting Healthcare Ethics in Social Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cribb A., Ball S. (2005) Towards an Ethical Audit of the Privatisation of Education, British Journal of Educational Studies 53/2:115–128
De Vries R., Conrad P. (1998) Why Bioethics Needs Sociology. In: DeVries R., Subedi J. (eds) Bioethics and Society. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Fox, R.C.: 1998 [1959], Experiment Perilous Physicians and Patients Facing the Unknown. New Brunswick: Transaction
Fox R.C., Swazey J.P. (1992) Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society. New York: Oxford University Press
Holm S. (2002) Going to the Roots of the Stem Cell Controversy. Bioethics 16: 493–507
Light D., McGee G. (1998) On the Social Embeddedness of Bioethics. In: DeVries R., Subedi J. (eds) Bioethics and Society. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
MacIntyre, A.: 1985, After Virtue. London: Duckworth
Strauss A.L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Wainwright, S.P., C. Williams, A. Cribb, C. Farsides, and M. Michael 2006a, ‘Ethical Boundary-work in the Embryonic Stem Cell Laboratory’, in: R. de Vries et al. (eds.), Sociology of Health & Illness, Special Issue, The View from Here: Bioethics and the Social Sciences
Wainwright S.P., Williams C., Michael M., Farsides B., Cribb A. (2006b) ‘From Bench to Bedside? Biomedical Scientists’ Expectations of Stem Cell Science as a Future Therapy for Diabetes. Social Science & Medicine 63: 2052–2064
Wainwright, S.P., C. Williams, M. Michael, B. Farsides, and A. Cribb (in press), ‘Remaking the Body? Scientists’ Genetic Discourses and Practices as Examples of Changing Expectations on Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetes’, New Genetics & Society
Weber R. (1990) Basic Content Analysis. London: Sage
Zussman, R. 2000, The Contributions of Sociology to Medical Ethics. Hastings Center Report, Jan/Feb, 7–11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cribb, A., Wainwright, S., Williams, C. et al. Towards the applied: the construction of ethical positions in stem cell translational research. Med Health Care and Philos 11, 351–361 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9114-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9114-y