Skip to main content
Log in

Do You Need a Receipt? Exploring Consumer Participation in Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper focuses on the consumer side of consumption tax evasion (CTE), a subcategory of the shadow economy. The ethical dimensions of tax evasion have been effectively captured by the existent literature on tax morale, yet it fails to address the role consumers can play in CTE. Further, there is a shortage of tax morale studies that explore ethical decision making as a process composed of multiple steps and determinants. To bridge these gaps, we turned to the consumer ethics literature and Jones’ issue-contingent model of ethical decision making. We developed the conceptual model of consumer ethical decision making for CTE by incorporating four key elements from the issue-contingent model, i.e. moral recognition, moral judgement, moral intention and moral intensity, while personal moral philosophies were introduced as an antecedent to the consumer ethical decision-making process. The study was conducted on a sample of consumers from Slovenia, where CTE is a widespread phenomenon. The findings confirm that consumers’ recognition of CTE as a moral issue is influenced by their moral philosophy and perceptions regarding the magnitude of CTE’s consequences, their visibility, probability, and temporal immediacy. These perceptions also play an important role in determining consumers’ moral judgements and intentions regarding CTE. Moreover, through the process of moral recognition and moral judgement, consumers form intentions to participate in, or avoid CTE. The study holds important implications for public policy makers who are trying to reduce the tax gap in times of economic instability and fiscal crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We acknowledge the differences between ethics and morality, especially emphasised in the philosophic literature. However, we will use the terms as synonyms since this is the only way we can follow the established terminology in the business ethics literature (Fisher 2004).

References

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Robertson, C. J., & Lascu, D. N. (2004). Post-communist consumer ethics: The case of Romania. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(1), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Robertson, C. J., Stanton, A. D. A., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). Business ethics in the Arab Gulf States: A three-country study. International Business Review, 11(1), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., Martinez-Vazque, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Russian attitudes toward paying taxes—before, during, and after the transition. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(12), 832–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Taxation Office (2013). Cash economy. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from http://www.ato.gov.au/businesses/pathway.aspx?pc=001/003/070.

  • Barnett, T., & Valentine, S. (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 338–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, T., Barnett, K., & Brown, G. (1999). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1161–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the role of social norms in tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobek, D. D., Roberts, R. W., & Sweeney, J. T. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Observers’ reactions to social-sexual behavior at work: An ethical decision making perspective. Journal of Management, 25(6), 779–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, B. A. (2000). The impact of customer characteristics and moral philosophies on ethical judgments of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (2003). Perceptions of who’s not paying their fair share. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen, K. S., & Ownbey, S. F. (2003). Associations between demographics and perceptions of unethical consumer behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(2), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2002). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-F., Pan, C.-T., & Pan, M.-C. (2009). The joint moderating impact of moral intensity and moral judgment on consumer’s use intention of pirated software. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, J. (2006). The impact of normative influence and locus of control on ethical judgments and intentions: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, J., & Fraedrich, J. (2002). Perceived risk, moral philosophy and marketing ethics: Mediating influences on sales managers’ ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 55(12), 951–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, J. S., Huang, C., & Lee, H. (2005). The antecedents of music piracy attitudes and intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2011). The underground economy: A threat to democracy, development and the rule of law. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/Doc/XrefViewHTML.asp?FileId=12997&lang=en.

  • Craft, J. (2012). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–39. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9

  • Cronan, T. P., & Al-Rafee, S. (2008). Factors that influence the intention to pirate software and media. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, C. C., Mitchell, V., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Cornwall, B. (2005). Measuring consumers’ ethical position in Austria, Britain, Brunei, Hong Kong, and USA. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(1), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culiberg, B., & Bajde, D. (2012). (Post)Transitional consumer perspectives on consumption tax avoidance: An exploratory study. In M. Haase & M. Kleinaltenkamp (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Macromarketing Conference (pp. 47–50). Berlin: Macromarketing Society.

  • Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. A., Andersen, M. G., & Curtis, M. B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, E. M., Frecknall-Hughes, J., & Glaister, K. W. (2009). Linking ethics and risk management in taxation: Evidence from an exploratory study in Ireland and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., Nataraajan, R., & Huang, W.-Y. (2005). Consumers’ moral philosophies: Identifying the idealist and the relativist. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1690–1701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erffmeyer, R. C., Keillor, B. D., & LeClaire, D. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallan, L. (1999). Gender, exposure to tax knowledge, and attitudes towards taxation; an experimental approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidermuc, K. (2010). Manj davka za mojstra, ceneje za stranko, nič za proračun (Less taxes for the master craftsman, cheaper for the customer, nothing for the government budget). Delo, Retrieved January 6, 2013, from http://www.delo.si/clanek/134249.

  • Fisher, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, G., & Valentine, S. (2003). Professionals’ tax liability assessments and ethical evaluations in an equitable relief innocent spouse case. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., O’Boyle, E. H., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets West: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 813–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2002). Developing a framework for ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D., & Crain, T. L. (1995). Ethical standards, attitudes toward risk, and intentional noncompliance: An experimental investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goles, T., White, G. B., Beebe, N., Dorantes, C. A., & Hewitt, B. (2006). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: A contextual extension. ACM SIGMIS Database, 37(2/3), 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, S., & Lennon, S. J. (2006). Purchase intent for fashion counterfeit products: Ethical ideologies, ethical judgments, and perceived risks. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(4), 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B. C., & Kaplan, S. E. (2005). An examination of the role of ethics in tax compliance decisions. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 27(1), 39–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, E., Meier-Pesti, K., & Kirchler, E. (2007). The decision process for ethical investment. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12(1), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P. C., & Elm, D. R. (2003). The effect of context on moral intensity of ethical issues: Revising Jones’s issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T., Dennis, C., & Wright, L. T. (2008). Myopia, customer returns and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1–2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and Web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 847–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitsch, D. L. (2004). Differences in the perceptions of moral intensity in the moral decision process: An empirical examination of accounting students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciejovsky, B., Schwarzenberger, H., & Kirchler, E. (2012). Rationality versus emotions: The case of tax ethics and compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L. J., & Mayo, M. A. (1991). An empirical test of a model of consumer ethical dilemmas. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 720–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marta, J., Heiss, C. M., & De Lurgio, S. A. (2008). An exploratory comparison of ethical perceptions of Mexican and U.S. marketers. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 539–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making. Business & Society, 41(1), 84–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. (2006). Three views on the ethics of tax evasion. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(1), 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. (2011). The ethics of tax evasion: Perspectives in theory and practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. W., Ho, S. S. M., & Li, A. Y. S. (2008). A comparative study on perceived ethics of tax evasion: Hong Kong vs the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencl, J., & May, D. R. (2009). The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V. W., & Chan, J. K. L. (2002). Investigating UK consumers’ unethical attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(1/2), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molero, J. C., & Puyol, F. (2012). Walking inside the potential tax evader’s mind: Tax morale does matter. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nill, A., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2005). The impact of corporate culture, the reward system, and perceived moral intensity on marketing students’ ethical decision making. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. (2012). Predictors, consequences, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolillo, J. G. P., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, M. (2011). Rise of the shadow economy: Second largest economy in the world. Retrieved January 6, 2013, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/benzingainsights/2011/11/07/rise-of-the-shadow-economy-second-largest-economy-in-the-world/.

  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1996). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 1009–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1983). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narváez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P., Reidenbach, R. E., & Forrest, P. J. (1996). The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B., & Öberseder, M. (2010). Half a century of marketing ethics: Shifting perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. (2010). The shadow economy in Europe, 2010. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from http://media.hotnews.ro/media_server1/document-2011-05-8-8602544-0-shadow.pdf.

  • Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C. E. (2010). Shadow economies all over the world: New estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007. Policy research working paper 5356. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/docserver/download/5356.pdf?expires=1363076992&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=CE65BADF7E44917D0F4E63DB370A33B8.

  • Shang, R. A., Chen, Y. C., & Chen, P. C. (2008). Ethical decisions about sharing music files in the P2P environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S. (1996). The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: A comparison of managerial professionals and the general public. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 469–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgements: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5), 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. J., Vitell, S. J., Al-Khatib, J., & Clark, I., I. I. I. (2007). The role of moral intensity and personal moral philosophies in the ethical decision making of marketers: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), 86–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Rao, C. P., & Vitell, S. J. (1996a). Ethical decision making: An investigation of services marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 635–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996b). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 92–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J., & Pan, Y. (2010). Ethical judgments in business ethics research: Definition, and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 405–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B. (2002). Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchase of pirated software. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(2), 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. (2003). Understanding taxpayer attitudes through understanding taxpayer identities. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 71–92). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. L., Vitell, S. J., Gilbert, F. W., & Rose, G. M. (2002). The impact of ethical cues on customer satisfaction with service. Journal of Retailing, 78(3), 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2003). Tax morale in transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 15(3), 357–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2006). The importance of faith: Tax morale and religiosity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(1), 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., Schneider, F., & Schaltegger, C. (2010). Local autonomy, tax morale, and the shadow economy. Public Choice, 144(1), 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., & Lynn, B. (2003). Impact of personal and situational factors on taxpayer compliance: An experimental analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Bateman, C. (2011). The impact of ethical ideologies, moral intensity, and social context on sales-based ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Bakir, A., Paolillo, J. G. P., Hidalgo, E. R., Al-Khatib, J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2003). Ethical judgments and intentions: A multinational study of marketing professionals. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(2), 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: An application and empirical testing of the Hunt–Vitell theory of ethics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2003). Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 41–69). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2004). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2005a). Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics, norms and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 491–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2005b). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(6), 862–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurthmann, K. (2013). A social cognitive perspective on the relationships between ethics education, moral attentiveness, and PRESOR. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetmar, S. A., & Eastman, K. K. (2000). Tax practitioners’ ethical sensitivity: A model and empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(4), 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C. (2011). Theory of planned behavior and ethics theory in digital piracy: An integrated model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Culiberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Culiberg, B., Bajde, D. Do You Need a Receipt? Exploring Consumer Participation in Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma. J Bus Ethics 124, 271–282 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1870-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1870-4

Keywords

Navigation