Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Professional Status of Bioethics Consultation

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is bioethics consultation a profession? Withfew exceptions, the arguments andcounterarguments about whether healthcareethics consultation is a profession haveignored the historical and cultural developmentof professions in the United States, the wayssocial changes have altered the work andboundaries of all professions, and theprofessionalization theories that explain howmodern societies institutionalize expertise inprofessions. This interdisciplinary analysisbegins to fill this gap by framing the debatewithin a larger theoretical context heretoforemissing from the bioethics literature. Specifically, the question of whether ethicsconsultation is a profession is examined fromthe perspectives of trait theory, Wilensky'sfive-stage process of professionalization,Abbott's interdependent system of professions,and Haug's deprofessionalization thesis. Whilehealthcare ethics consultation does not meetthe criteria to claim professional status,neither could most professions pass these idealtheoretical standards. Instead of a yes or nodichotomous response to the question, it ismore helpful to envision a professionalizationcontinuum with sales clerks or carpenters atone end and medicine or law at the other. During the past decade healthcare ethicsconsultation has been moving along thiscontinuum toward greater professional status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

NOTES AND REFERENCES

  1. LaPuma J. Schiedermayer DL. Ethics consultation: Skills, roles, and training. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991; 114: 284. They argue that only physicians should be ethics consultants, which would result in all ethics consultants being licensed professionals.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lilje C. Commentary: Ethics consultation: A dangerous, antidemocratic charlantry. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993; 2: 440.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yeo M. Prolegomena to any future code of ethics for bioethicists. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993;2: 403.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ross JW. Commentary: Why clinical ethics consultants might not want to be educators. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993; 2: 445.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freidson E. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carr-Saunders AP. Wilson PA. The Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Millerson G. The Qualifying Associations: A Study in Professionalization. London: Routledge, 1964; Abbott P, Wallace C. The Sociology of the Caring Professions. New York: The Falmer Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waters M. Collegiality, bureaucratization, and professionalization: AWeberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology 1989: 94: 945–972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weber M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. NY: Charles Scribner and Sons, 1958 [1905].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books, 1982: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parsons T. The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Summer 1975: 257–278.

  12. Goode W. Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: Psychology, sociology, and medicine. American Sociological Review 1960; 25: 902–914.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freidson E. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes EC. Professions, in On Work, Race, and the Sociological Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994: 37–50; reprinted from Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Chicago: ASA, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Orr RD. Personal and Professional Integrity in Clinical Medicine. Update 8, 4: Loma Linda, CA: Loma Linda University Center for Christian Ethics 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Starr, 15.

  17. Moore WE. The Professions: Roles and Rules.New York: SageFoundation, 1970: 226–227.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brody H. Healer's Power. New Haven, Ct: Yale University Press, 1993: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cleaves, P. Professions and the State: The Mexican Case. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1987: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilensky HL. The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology September 1964; LXX(2): 138.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilensky, 137–158.

  22. Wilensky, 142.

  23. Wilensky, 142–146.

  24. Wilensky, 142.

  25. Gallessich J. The Profession and Practice of Consultation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1982: 367.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aulisio MP. Arnold RM. Youngner SJ. Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the society for health and human values - society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine 4 July 2000; 133(1): 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gallessich, 367.

  28. Garcia A. An examination of the social work profession's efforts to achieve legal regulation. Journal of Counseling and Development May/June 1990: 492.

  29. Scofield G. Ethics consultation: The least dangerous profession. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993; 2: 417.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bledstein BJ. The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Freedman B. Bringing codes to newcastle. Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice, Hoffmaster, B., Freedman, B., Fraser, G., eds. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1989: 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yeo, 404.

  33. Scofield, 420. Scofield also complains about the field's lack of a code of professional ethics in other articles, including, Is theMedical Ethicist an Expert? ABA Bioethics Bulletin Winter 1994; 3(1): 9.

  34. The 1998 SHHV-SBC Task Force Report, Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation - adopted also by the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) - is a beginning to the process of establishing standards.

  35. Fletcher JC. Commentary: Constructiveness where it counts. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993; 2: 430.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A code of ethics for the American Society of Newspaper Editors can be found in Codes of Professional Responsibility Second Edition, Gordon RA. ed. Washington D.C.: The Bureau of National Affairs, 1990: 135–138.

  37. Codes of Ethics for Little League Managers and Coaches, Little League Players, and Little League Parents are found on the worldwide web at http://www.tcfn.org/rcll/cethic.html [coaches’ ethics]; http://www.tcfn.org/rcll/plethic.html [players’ ethics]; and http://www.tcfn.org/rcll/pethic.html [parents’ ethics].

  38. There are three different codes of ethics for magicians: one adopted by the Society of American Magicians (S.A.M.); one adopted by the International Brotherhood of Magicians (I.B.M.); and a Universal Code of Ethics jointly endorsed by both organizations. S.A.M. Assembly 206, Program handout. Austin Tx: Aug. 21, 1997.

  39. Starr, 15.

  40. Abbott A. The System of Professions An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Abbott, 3.

  42. Abbott, 2.

  43. Abbott, 35.

  44. Abbott, 35–38.

  45. Abbott, 38.

  46. Abbott, 316.

  47. Perkins HS. Saathoff BS. Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians: an exploratory study. American Journal of Medicine 1988; 85: 761–765.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marsh FH. Why physicians should not do ethics consults. Theoretical Medicine 1992; 13: 286.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hoffman DE. Regulating ethics committees in health care institutions - Is it time? Maryland Law Review 1991; 50(3): 749.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Judge Terry's decision from In re A.C. 573 A.2d 1235, D.C. 1990, as cited by Hoffman, 749–750.

  51. Hoffman, 750.

  52. Hoffman, 751.

  53. Fletcher JC, Hoffman DE. Ethics committees: Time to experiment with standards. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994; 120: 335–338.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fletcher and Hoffman, 335.

  55. Chief Justice Hughes, Matter of Quinlan 355 A. 2d 647: 27.

  56. Hughes, 29–30. “We repeat for the sake of emphasis and clarity that... they shall consult with the hospital ‘Ethics Committee’ or like body of the institution.”

  57. Hoffman, 790.

  58. Ethics committees were legally mandated in Maryland in 1987, and in New Jersey in 1990.

  59. Fleetwood J. Unger SS. Institutional ethics committees and the shield of liability. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994; 120: 320.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Abbott, 68.

  61. An example of a profession establishing jurisdictional control over a competing occupation in a contiguous position in a division of labor is medicine and pharmaceutical interests. Starr describes how medicine initially gained control of pharmaceuticals in the early 1900s in Social Transformation, 127–134. But, according to Abbott's interdependent system of professions, the issue can return so it is an open question whether medicine will continue to successfully control pharmaceutical interests.

  62. Haug MR. Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monographs 1973; 20: 195–211; and Haug MR. The deprofessionalization of everyone? Sociological Focus 1975; 8: 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Haug, Alternative Hypothesis, 196.

  64. Marsh, 286.

  65. Writings about the specialization of labor date back to the late eighteenth century. Durkheim's classic work, Division of Labor in Society, posits that societies generally develop from a simple, “mechanic” form of solidarity to a more complex, “organic” form of solidarity based on occupational specialization. Writing at the turn of the last century, Durkheim envisaged a society in which most traditional forms of social connection would be eliminated by an impersonal market economy and an ever more highly specialized division of labor. Durkheim E. The Division of Labor in Society. Halls, WD. trans. NY: Free Press 1984 [1893].

    Google Scholar 

  66. Haug MR. Computer technology and the obsolescence of the concept of profession. Work and Technology 1977: 215–228.

  67. McGee G. Phronesis in clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine 1996; 17: 321–322.

    Google Scholar 

  68. McGee, 322.

  69. Haug. Computer Technology, 226.

  70. Freidson E. The changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology 1984; 10: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Durkheim E. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. Brookfield, C. trans. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958 [1897–1899]).

    Google Scholar 

  72. DeRenzo EG. Providing clinical ethics consultation. HEC Forum 1994; 6(6): 387.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hughes, 37.

  74. McCullough L. John Gregory (1724–1773) and the invention of professional relationships in medicine. Journal of Clinical Ethics Spring 1997; 8(1): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  75. McCullough, 19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. American Medical Association, 515 North State Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60610, USA E-mail

    Deborah Cummins

Authors
  1. Deborah Cummins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, D. The Professional Status of Bioethics Consultation. Theor Med Bioeth 23, 19–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019567812747

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019567812747

Search

Navigation