Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Audit-related Ethical Decisions Dependent upon Mood?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the impact of mood on individuals’ ethical decision-making processes through the Graham [Graham, J. W.: 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 1–52] model of Principled Organizational Dissent. In particular, the research addresses how an individual’s mood influences his or her willingness to report the unethical actions of a colleague. Participants’ experienced an affectively charged, unrelated event and were then asked to make a decision regarding whistle-blowing intentions in a public accounting context. As expected, negative mood was associated with lower intentions to report the unethical actions of others to a superior within the organization. The Graham model, which proposes that reporting intentions are impacted by the three determinants of seriousness, personal responsibility and cost, was employed to more clearly understand the nature of the affect–reporting intention relationship. The role of affect was explained by demonstrating that two determinants mediate the relationship between mood and whistle-blowing intentions. Specifically, as seriousness and responsibility have a positive impact on reporting intentions, the reduction of these perceptions by negative mood reduces the intent to report. The negative impact of personal cost on reporting intentions was significant, although not as a mediator of mood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1988). Code of Professional Conduct. AICPA, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, J., and M. Maremont: (2001). ’How Ex-Accountant Added up to Trouble for Humbled Xerox’, Wall Street Journal Online (June 28)

  • Barnett T., Valentine S. (2004). IIssue Contingencies and Marketers’ Recognition of Ethical Issues, Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Business Research 57:338–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney P. H. (1986). Affect and Memory: A Review. Psychological Bulletin 99(2):229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bless H., Clore G. L., Schwarz N., Golisano V., Rabe C., Wolk M. (1996). ‘Mood and the Use of Scripts: Does a Happy Mood Really Lead to Mindlessness?’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(4):665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower G. H. (1981). ‘Mood and Memory’, American Psychologist 36:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief A. P. (2001). ‘Organizational Behavior and the Study of Affect: Keep Your Eyes on the Organization’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86(1):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J., J. Cohen and G. Monroe: 2005, ‘An Examination of the Effect of Mood States on Profession Skepticism’, Unpublished Manuscript, York University)

  • Clore G. L., Schwarz N., Conway M. (1994). ‘Affective Causes and Consequences of Social Information Processing’. In: R. S. Wyer Jr., T. K. Srull (eds). Handbook of Social Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. B. and S. Whitecotton: 2005, ‘How Did Enron Affect Our Student’s Propensity to “Blow the Whistle’, Unpublished manuscript, University of North Texas

  • Fieldler K. (2001). ‘Affective Influences on Social Information Processing’. In: Forgas J. P. (ed.), Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 163–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas J. P. (2001). ‘The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An Integrative Theory of Mood Effects on Cognition and Judgments’. In: Martin L. L., Clore G. L. (eds), Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User’s Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 99–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas J. P., George J. M. (2001). Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86(1):3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P.: 1992, `Affect in Social Judgments and Decisions: A Multiprocess Model', in M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York)

  • Forgas J. P. (1995). Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin 117:39–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudine A., Thorne L. (2001). Emotion and Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 31(2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George J. M., Jones G. R. (2001). Towards a Process Model of Individual Change in Organizations. Human Relations 54:419–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrards-Hesse A., Spies K., Hesse F. W. (1994). Experimental Inductions of Emotional States and their Effectiveness: A Review. British Journal of Psychology 85:55–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J. W. (1986). Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay. Research in Organizational Behavior 8:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen A. M., Shalker T. E., Clark M., Karp L. (1978). Resources Required in the Construction and Reconstruction of Conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M.: 1984, `Toward Understanding the Role of Affect in Cognition', in R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ)

  • Isen A. M. (1993). Positive Affect and Decision Making. In: Lewis M., Haviland J. M. (eds), Handbook of Emotions. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Internal Auditors: 2003, ‘Assessment Guide for U.S. Legislative, Regulatory, and Listing Exchanges Requirements Affecting Internal Auditing’, The IIA Research Foundation (April 17). http://www.theiia.org/iia/publications

  • Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16(2):366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A. and R. D. Bretz: 1993, `Report on an Alternative Measure of Affective Disposition', Educational and Psychological Measurement 53, 1095–1104

  • Kadous K. (2001). Improving Jurors’ Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases. Contemporary Accounting Research 18(3):425–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E. (1995). An Examination of Auditors’ Reporting Intentions upon Discovery of Procedures Prematurely Signed-Off. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 14:90–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., Whitecotton S. M. (2001). An Examination of Auditors’ Reporting Intentions When Another Auditor is Offered Client Employment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20:45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kida T., Smith J. F. (1995). The Encoding and Retrieval of Numerical Data for Decision Making in Accounting Contexts: Model Development. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(7/8):585–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger A. N., Lewinsohn S., Aiello J. R. (1994). The Influence of Feedback on Mood: Linear Effects on Pleasantness and Curvilinear Effects on Arousal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60:276–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-analysis of the Empirical Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(1):58–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latane B., Nida S. (1981). Ten Years of Research on Group Size and Helping. Psychological Bulletin 89(2):308–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn S., Mano H. (1993). Multi-attribute Choice and Affect; The Influence of Naturally Occurring and Manipulated Moods on Choice Processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 6:33–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke E. A., Latham G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M. P., Near J. P., Schwenk C. R. (1991). ‘Who Blows the Whistle and Why?’. Industrial and labor Relations Review 45(1):113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauls C. A., Stemmler G. (2003). Substance and Bias in Social Desirability Responding. Personality and Individual Differences 35:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon L. A. (1990). Ethical Judgments in Accounting: Cognitive-Developmental Perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose J. M. (2001). The Effects of Multimedia-induced Affective States on Recall and Decision-making by Individual Investors. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2:22–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J. J. Jr, Johnson D. A., Morris D., Dyrnes S. (1993). ‘An Investigation of the Reporting of Questionable Acts in an International Setting’. Journal of Accounting Research 31(supplement):75–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. A., Ellsworth P. C. (1987). Patterns of Appraisal and Emotion Related to Taking an Exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(3):475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone D. N., Kadous K. (1997). The Joint Effects of Task-Related Negative Affect and Task Difficulty in Multiattribute Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70(2):159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, D. T., R. E. Petty and S. M. Smith: 1995, `Positive Mood Can Increase or Decrease Message Scrutiny: The Hedonic Contingency View of Mood and Message Processing', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziva K. (1999). Social Cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 305219, Denton, TX, 76203, USA

    Mary B. Curtis

Authors
  1. Mary B. Curtis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary B. Curtis.

Additional information

Mary Curtis is an Associate Professor of Auditing and Accounting Information Systems in the Department of Accounting at the University of North Texas. Her research interests include Judgment and Decision-making in accounting and issues related to Information Systems Auditing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtis, M.B. Are Audit-related Ethical Decisions Dependent upon Mood?. J Bus Ethics 68, 191–209 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9066-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9066-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation