Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:11:51.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

J. Cutmore  and
P. J. Kelly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Utilitas , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 324 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1983 Thiel, M., John Stuart Mill, Lotze, Spencer, Heidelberg: Elpis.Google Scholar
1984 Gray, J., ‘Indirect Utility and Fundamental Rights’, in Paul, E. Frankel, Miller, F. D. Jun. and Paul, J. eds., Human Rights, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1984 West, R. L., ‘In the Interest of the Governed: A Utilitarian Justification of Substantive Judicial Review’, Georgia Law Review, xviii (1984), 469–528.Google Scholar
1985 Backhouse, R., A History of Modern Economic Analysis, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1985 Dasgupta, A. K., Epochs in Economic Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1985 Fontana, B., Rethinking the Politics of Commercial Society: The Edinburgh Review, 1802–1832, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985 Olafson, F. A., ‘Reflections on a Passage in Mill's Utilitarianism’, in Potter, N. T. ed., Morality and Universality, Boston: Reidel, pp. 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985 Strasser, M., ‘Mill's Higher and Lower Pleasures Re-examined’, International Studies in Philosophy, xvii (1985), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986 Blaug, M., ‘John Stuart Mill’, in Great Economists Before Keynes: An Introduction to the Lives and Works of One Hundred Great Economists of the Past, Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 164–67.Google Scholar
1986 Chitnis, A. C., The Scottish Enlightenment and Early Victorian Society, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1986 Dixon, K., Freedom and Equality: The Moral Basis of Socialism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1986 Francis, M., ‘A Prolegomena for the History of British Political Thought during the Nineteenth Century’, Political Science, xxxviii (1986), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986 Griffin, J., Well-being, Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1986 Madison, G. B., The Logic of Liberty, New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1986 McGowan, R., ‘A Powerful Sympathy: Terror, the Prison, and Humanitarian Reform in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain’, Journal of British Studies, xxv (1986), 312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986 Vezzi, R., Directing Human Actions: Perspectives on Basic Ethical Issues, Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
1987 Boesche, R., The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987 Burgess-Jackson, K., ‘Duties, Rights and Charities’, Journal of Social Philosophy, xviii (1987), 3–12.10.1111/j.1467-9833.1987.tb00139.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987 Canovan, M., ‘The Eloquence of John Stuart Mill’, History of Political Thought, viii (1987), 505–20.Google Scholar
1987 Forsythe, W. J., The Reform of Prisoners, 1830–1900, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1987 Galbraith, J. K., A History of Economics: The Past as the Present, London: Hamish Hamilton, published in the U.S.A. as Economics in Perspective: A Critical History, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
1987 Holbrook, D. M., ‘Qualitatively-Hedonistic Utilitarianism’, University of Iowa Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1987 Hollander, S., ‘John Stuart Mill as Economic Theorist’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 4 vols., London: Macmillan, iii. 471–76.Google Scholar
1987 Hudson, S. D., Human Character and Morality: Reflections from the History of Ideas, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1987 Kamm, J., ‘Harriet Taylor (née Hardy, Later Mrs John Stuart Mill) (1807–58)’, The New Palgrave, iv. 612.Google Scholar
1987 Koot, G. M., English Historical Economics, 1870–1926: The Rise of Economic History and Neo-Mercantilism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987 Morris, H. A., ‘The Influence of the Mill, Carlyle “West Indian debate” on Four Victorian Novelists’, Howard University Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1987 Norbendo, S. E., ‘Children's Rights, ‘die Antipadagogen’, and the Paternalism of John Stuart Mill’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, xxxi (1987), 163–80.Google Scholar
1987 Ryan, A., ‘John Stuart Mill (1806–1873)’, The New Palgrave, iii. 466–71.Google Scholar
1987 Thomas, G., The Moral Philosophy of T. H. Green, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1987 Trusted, J., Moral Principles and Social Values, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1987 Winch, D., ‘James Mill (1773–1836)’, The New Palgrave, iii. 465–66.Google Scholar
1988 Andrew, E., Shylock's Rights: A Grammar of Lockian Claims, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1988 Brundage, A., England's ‘Prussian Minister’: Edwin Chadwick and the Politics of Government Growth, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
1988 Curtis, S., ‘The Philosopher's Flowers: John Stuart Mill as Botanist’, Encounter, lxxx (1988), 26–33.Google Scholar
1988 Edwards, D., ‘Toleration and Mill's Liberty of Thought and Discussion’, in Mendus, S. ed., Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–114.10.1017/CBO9780511735295.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Green, M., ‘Sympathy, Self-Interest, and the Revision of Benthamism: The Development of John Stuart Mill's Moral and Social Philosophy, 1826–1840’, York University Canada Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1988 Kekes, J., The Examined Life, Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
1988 Laidler, D., ‘British Monetary Orthodoxy in the 1870's’, Oxford Economic Papers, xl (1988), 71–109.Google Scholar
1988 Le Selva, S. V., ‘A Single Truth: Mill on Harm, Paternalism, and Good Samaritanism’, Political Studies, xxvi (1988), 486–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Luce, L., ‘Mill, Law and Numbers’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, lxvi (1988), 320–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Melden, A. I., Rights in Moral Lives: A Historical Philosophical Essay, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Mill, J. S., Journals and debating Speeches, ed. Robson, John M., 2 vols., Toronto: University of Toronto Press (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. xxvi–xxvii).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Mill, J. S., Public and Parliamentary Speeches, eds. Robson, John M. and Kinzer, Bruce L., 2 vols., Toronto: University of Toronto Press (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. xxviii–xxix).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 The Mill Newsletter, xxiii. 2 (1988).Google Scholar
1988 The Mill Newsletter, xxiii. 2 (1988). Rea, B., ‘J. S. Mill: On Justice and Rights’, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
1988 The Mill Newsletter, xxiii. 2 (1988). Schweik, R. C., ‘Mill's Analogies in On Liberty and the Uses of Inconsistency’, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
1988 Millar, A., ‘Following Nature’, Philosophical Quarterly, xxxviii (1988), 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Miller, P. J. and Kim, K. S., ‘Human Nature and the Development of Character: The Clash of Descriptive and Normative Elements on John Stuart Mill's Educational Theory’, Journal of Educational Thought, xxii (1988), 133–44.Google Scholar
1988 Organ, T. W., The Self in its Worlds, East and West, London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
1988 Peltason, T., ‘Imagination and Learning in George Eliot, Mill, and Dickens’, Essays in Criticism, xxxviii (1988), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Riley, J., Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and John Stuart Mill, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988 Santiago-Valiente, W., ‘Historical Background of the Classical Monetary Theory and the “Real Bills” Banking Tradition’, History of Political Economy, xx (1988), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Shurbutt, S. B., ‘Matthew Arnold and John Stuart Mill: In Harmony with Nature’, Essays in Literature, xv (1988), 35–43.Google Scholar
1988 Turk, C., Coleridge and Mill: A Study of Influence, Brookfield: Gower.Google Scholar
1988 Walter, E., ‘A Concept of Happiness’, Philosophy Research Archives, xiii (1988), 137–50.Google Scholar
1988 Zastoupil, L., ‘J. S. Mill and India’, Victorian Studies, xxxii (1988), 31–54.Google Scholar
1989 Tullock, G., Mill and Sexual Equality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989)Google Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989) Brown, D. G., ‘More on Self-Enslavement and Paternalism in Mill’, pp. 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989) Smith, G. W., ‘Freedom and Virtue in Politics: Some Aspects of Character, Circumstance and Utility from Helvétius to J. S. Mill’, pp. 112–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Williams, G., ‘J. S. Mill and Political Violence’, pp. 102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar