Abstract
Some would argue that the more promising areas of business ethics research are "sensitive." In such areas, it would be expected that subjects, if inclined to respond at all, would be guarded in their responses, or respond inaccurately. We provide an introduction to an empirical approach -- the unmatched block count (UCT) -- for collecting these potentially sensitive data which provides absolute anonymity and confidentiality to subjects and "legal immunity" to the researcher. Interestingly, under UCT protocol researchers could not divulge subjects' responses even if they were inclined to do so. Beyond that, UCTs provide complete disclosure to subjects and there is no deception.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpar, P. and D. Spitzer: 1990, ‘Response Behavior of Entrepreneurs in a Mail Survey’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 14(2), 31–44.
American Psychological Association: 1992, Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).
American Psychological Association: 1991, Questionnaires Used in the Prediction of Trustworthiness in Pre employment Selection Decision: An APA Task Force Report.
Armacost, R. L., J. C. Hosseini, S. A. Morris and K. A. Rehbein: 1991, ‘An Empirical Comparison of Direct Questioning, Scenario, and Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Business Information’, Decision Sciences 22(5), 1073–1090.
Bergmann, T. J., D. H. Mundt and E. J. Illgen: 1990, ‘The Evolution of Honesty Rights and Means for their Evaluation’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 3, 215–223.
Boruch, R. F. and J. S. Cecil: 1979, Assuring the Confidentiality of Social Research Data (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA).
Chaudhuri, A. and R. Mukerjee: 1988, Randomized Responses: Theory and Techniques (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York).
Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzger: 1992a, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation, and Privacy in Applied Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 207–221.
Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzger: 1992b, ‘Integrity Testing: A Delicate Balance’, Ethikos 5, 14–17.
Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzger: 1992, ‘Integrity Testing' for Personnel Selection: An Unsparing Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 147–156.
Dalton, D. R., M. B. Metzger and J. C. Wimbush: In press, ‘Integrity Testing: An Overview and Research Agenda’, in G. R. Ferris and K. M. Rowland (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 12) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CN).
Durham, A. M. and M. J. Lichtenstein: 1983, ‘Response Bias in Self-report Surveys: Evaluation of Randomized Responses’, in G. P. Waldo (ed.), Measurement Issues in Criminal Justice (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).
Fox, J. A. and P. E. Tracy: 1986, Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).
Herzberger, S. D.: 1990, ‘The Cyclical Nature of Child Abuse: A Study of Research Methodology’, American Behavioral Scientist 33, 529–545.
Hosseini, J. C. and R. L. Armacost: 1990, ‘Gathering Sensitive Data in Organizations’, American Behavioral Scientist 36(4), 443–471.
Jones, J. W., P. Ash and C. Soto: 1990, ‘Employee Privacy Rights and Pre-Employment Honesty Tests’, Employee Relations Law Journal 15, 561–575.
Lee, R. M.: 1993, Doing Research on Sensitive Topics (Sage Publication, Newbury Park).
Lee, R. M. and C. M. Renzetti: 1990, ‘The Problems of Researching Sensitive Topics’, American Behavioral Scientist 33, 510–528.
Manhardt, P. J.: 1989. ‘Base Rates and Test of Deception: Has I/O Psychology Shot Itself in the Foot?’, The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 25(2), 48–50.
Martin, S. L. and W. Terris: 1991, ‘Predicting Infrequent Behavior: Clarifying the Impact on False-positive Rates’, Journal of Applied Psychology 76, 484–487.
Melton, G. and J. Gray: 1988, ‘Ethical Dilemmas in AIDS Research: Individual Privacy and Public Health’, American Psychologist 43, 60–64.
Metzger, M. B. and D. R. Dalton: 1992, ‘Just Say No' To Integrity Testing’, Journal of Law and Public Policy 4, 9–38.
Moore, R. W. and R. M. Stewart: 1989, ‘Evaluating Employee Integrity: Moral and Methodological Problems’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2, 203–215.
Murphy, K. R.: 1987, ‘Detecting Infrequent Deception’, Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 611–614.
Murphy, K. R.: 1989, ‘May be Should Shoot Ourselves in the Foot: Reply to Manhardt’, The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 26(3), 45–46.
National Academy of Sciences: 1979, Report on the Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Response (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC).
O'Bannon, R. M., L. A. Goldinger and G. S. Appleby: 1988, Honesty and Integrity Testing: A Practical Guide (Applied Information Resources, Atlanta, GA).
Raghavarao, D. and W. T. Federer.: 1973, Application of the BIB Designs as an Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Survey Sampling. Number BU-490-M in the Mimeo Series of the Biometrics Unit, Cornell University.
Raghavarao, D. and W. T. Federe.: 1979, ‘Block Total Response as an Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Surveys’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B: Methodological) 41(1), 40–45.
Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 457–665.
Renzetti, C. M. and R. M. Lee: 1993, Researching Sensitive Topics (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).
Sackett, P. R., L. R. Burris and C. Callahan: 1989, ‘Integrity Testing for Personnel Selection: An Update’, Personnel Psychology 42, 491–528.
Schuman, H. and G. Kalton: 1985, ‘Survey Methods’, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Random House, New York), pp. 635–698.
Seiber, J. E. and B. Stanley: 1988, ‘Ethical and Professional Dimensions of Socially Sensitive Research’, American Psychologist 43, 49–55.
Smith, L. L., W. T. Federer and D. Raghavarao: 1974, ‘A Comparison of Three Techniques for Eliciting Truthful Answers to Sensitive Questions’, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Social Statistics Section), 447–452.
Steeh, C. G.: 1981, ‘Trends in Nonrsponse Rates, 1952–1979’, Public Opinion Quarterly 45, 40–57.
Tracy, P. E. and J. A. Fox: 1981, ‘The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements’, American Sociological Review 46, 187–200.
U. S. Congress: 1991, The Use of Integrity Tests for Pre-employment Screening. Office of Technical Assistance (United States Printing Office, Washington, DC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M. & Wimbush, J.C. Collecting "Sensitive" Data in Business Ethics Research: A Case for the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT). Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1049–1057 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017917904743
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017917904743