Boredom: Under-aroused and restless
Introduction
Boredom is a common human experience characterised as unpleasant, and associated with a range of negative outcomes including depression (Goldberg, Eastwood, LaGuardia, & Danckert, 2011), a lack of life meaning (Fahlman, Mercer, Gaskovski, Eastwood, & Eastwood, 2009), excessive gambling (Mercer & Eastwood, 2010), and substance abuse (LePera, 2011). We define boredom as a disengaged state in which the individual is motivated to be engaged with their environment, but for whom all attempts to do so fail (Eastwood, Frischen, Fenske, & Smilek, 2012). Experienced as negatively valenced, this description highlights a prominent cognitive component of boredom – attentional failures (Eastwood et al., 2012; see also Carriere et al., 2008, Cheyne et al., 2006). Indeed, research has consistently demonstrated objective behavioural consequences of both state and trait boredom such that sustained attention is clearly impaired (Damrad-Frye and Laird, 1989, Hunter and Eastwood, 2016, Malkovsky et al., 2012).
The confluence of a strong motivation to engage and failures to satisfy that desire is a recipe for frustration and agitation. One of the earliest descriptions of boredom, based on a psychoanalytic case study (Greenson, 1953), suggested the state could be cast as either apathetic or agitated. We would argue that the former subtype proposed by Greenson – apathetic boredom – is merely apathy (Goldberg et al., 2011). By our own definition, when bored we are motivated to engage, a condition precluded by the notion of apathy. Instead, we and others have described boredom as a unitary construct characterised as a restlessness borne of unsatisfactory engagement (Merrifield & Danckert, 2014).
Casting boredom as a kind of restlessness is hardly novel. Sir Francis Galton once informally measured ‘fidget’ during a lecture attended in the late 1800s. To his eye, when people were bored they exhibited significantly more ‘sway’ in their posture, and fidgeted more frequently which he took to be a clear index of restlessness (Galton, 1885). We and others have substantiated this description of boredom by showing an increase in autonomic arousal associated in people reporting being in a bored state (Berlyne, 1960, Jang et al., 2015, London et al., 1972, Lundberg et al., 1993, Martin et al., 2006, Merrifield and Danckert, 2014, Ohsuga et al., 2001).
This characterisation of boredom as a high arousal state is far from uncontroversial with some suggesting that boredom is more consistently associated with low arousal properly attributed to situations lacking in stimulation (Barmack, 1939, Geiwitz, 1966, Mikulas and Vodanovich, 1993, Pattyn et al., 2008, Russel, 1980, Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2012; see also Westgate & Wilson, in press in which the literature on boredom and arousal is shown to be fairly evenly split between the high and low arousal camps). Barmack (1939) even goes so far as to suggest that boredom more closely approximates the physiological state of sleep! This claim fits well with self-reports that consistently associate boredom with low arousal (Van Tilberg & Igou, 2011). While it is possible that self-reports reflect a hindsight bias – when evaluated retrospectively we associate boredom with doing nothing and cast it as under-arousing – it is plausible that the subjective feeling and physiological signatures are not identical, or at the very least, are not static. In other words, differences in the subjective feelings associated with being bored and the accompanying physiological signature may chart distinct stages of the experience. When we first notice being bored we are likely in an underarousing, monotonous circumstance. As we try extricate ourselves from this, arousal levels should rise. More importantly, those arousal levels should hit a peak when our efforts to engage in stimulating activities fail, accompanied by feelings of restlessness (note: the association between boredom and restlessness is ubiquitous in studies of leisure boredom in teens; e.g., Spaeth, Weichold, & Silbereisen, 2015). Now we’re bored and we can’t get out of it! These failures may in turn lead to some form of helplessness better characterised as a low arousal state. The point here is that state boredom is dynamic and may best be thought of as both a high and low arousal experience (Eastwood et al., 2012, Fahlman et al., 2013).
The current study intended to examine the relationship between self-reports of state boredom and measures intended to track changes in subjective feelings of high and low arousal. To do this we induced the states of boredom and interest separately by having people read either boring or interesting passages of text, and used experience probes to evaluate state boredom, mind-wandering, restlessness and sleepiness. The latter two probes were intended to provide an index of subjective perception of arousal levels, whereas the mind-wandering probe served as a measure of attentiveness. While different terms could have been chosen to index the state of underarousal, we adopted ‘sleepiness’ to directly examine Barmack’s claim that boredom approaches sleep in terms of arousal. In addition, there is some ecological validity to asking about sleepiness during a session of reading – that is, we have all had the experience of getting drowsy while reading, even when engaged by the material. In addition to probing levels of mind-wandering, we also measured blink rates as an indirect indication of attention failure. We expected to replicate findings showing that increased levels of mind-wandering and blink rates are associated with off task processing and boredom. With respect to self-reported levels of arousal, we expected that if boredom is best characterised as a low arousal state then ratings of sleepiness should track with ratings of boredom. That is, as boredom rises so should self-reported levels of sleepiness. The converse would be true if boredom was a uniquely high arousal state – in this instance, ratings of restlessness should rise with rising levels of boredom. A third possibility is that boredom is best thought of as both a high and low arousal experience – at least subjectively. In this instance we would expect self-reports of both sleepiness and restlessness to rise with rising levels of state boredom. Our focus here is primarily on state boredom. Nevertheless, we included measures of trait boredom for exploratory purposes.
Section snippets
Participants
Twenty-eight undergraduates (12 females; mean age = 19.5 years; SD = 1.52 years) from the University of Waterloo participated in exchange for course credit. Data from three participants was excluded due to difficulties capturing eye-tracking for two participants and a failure to complete the session for the third participant. Thus all data were conducted on a sample of twenty-five participants (10 females; mean age = 19.56 years; SD = 1.58 years). All participants had normal or corrected to
Results
Greenhouse Geisser corrections were applied to the reported degrees of freedom wherever homosphericity was violated.
Discussion
We would not claim that the current study definitively resolves the debate concerning boredom and arousal. What it does do is provide some initial evidence for the contention that boredom is both a high and a low arousal state and in doing so opens up some key avenues for further research. Before discussing this in some detail we turn to aspects of the data that replicate previous findings in the boredom literature. Despite the relatively low sample size we replicate the finding that boredom
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Scott Simpson for developing the data collection GUI that interfaced with the EyeLink II API and sequenced the responses from the participant to the eye-tracking data. We would also like to thank Arthur Hammerschmidt, for writing the Python programs to extract data from the eye-tracking files.
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was funded by an NSERC Discovery Grant (109618) to JD. There are no conflicts of interest for any author. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and received ethics clearance from the University of Waterloo’s Office of Research Ethics. All participants gave written informed consent prior to completing the study.
References (55)
- et al.
Everyday attention lapses and memory failures: The affective consequences of mindlessness
Consciousness and Cognition
(2008) - et al.
Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures
Consciousness and Cognition
(2006) - et al.
I can’t get no satisfaction: Potential causes of boredom
Consciousness and Cognition
(2014) - et al.
What to do when feeling bored?: Students' strategies for coping with boredom
Learning and Individual Differences
(2010) - et al.
Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective
Contemporary Educational Psychology
(2011) - et al.
Assessment of phasic work stress using autonomic indices
International Journal of Psychophysics
(2001) - et al.
Psychophysiological investigation of the vigilance decrement: Boredom or cognitive fatigue?
Physiology & Behaviour
(2008) - et al.
Depression assessment after traumatic brain injury: An empirically based classification method
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(2003) Studies on the psychophysiology of boredom: Part I. The effect of 15 mgs. of benzedrine sulfate and 60 mgs. of ephedrine hydrochloride on blood pressure, report of boredom and other factors
Journal of Experimental Psychology
(1939)- et al.
On the function of boredom
Behavioral Sciences
(2013)
Conflict, arousal, and curiosity
The experience of boredom: The role of the self-perception of attention
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention
Perspectives on Psychological Science
The bright side of boredom
Frontiers in Psychology
Does a lack of meaning cause boredom? Results from psychometric, longitudinal and experimental analyses
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale
Assessment
Boredom proneness—The development and correlates of a new scale
Journal of Personality Assessment
The measure of fidget
Nature
Structure of boredom
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
On boredom
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
Does state boredom cause failures of attention? Examining the relations between trait boredom, state boredom, and sustained attention
Experimental Brain Research
Exploring the relationship between boredom and self-control in TBI
Experimental Brain Research Special Topic on Boredom and Mind-wandering
Cited by (36)
In search of boredom: beyond a functional account
2023, Trends in Cognitive SciencesAnxious, bored, and (maybe) missing out: Evaluation of anxiety attachment, boredom proneness, and fear of missing out (FoMO)
2020, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :While independently it is expected that anxiety attachment will predict FoMO (H2), it is expected that boredom proneness will mediate this relationship. Quite simply, individuals who are bored are more prone to mind wandering (Danckert et al., 2018; Game, 2007; and; Martin et al., 2006) and as a result, more likely to think about what others are doing. This could be a deleterious combination for anxiously-attached individuals given their inclination to ruminate (Caldwell & Shaver, 2012; Henschel, Nandrino, & Doba, 2020; Reynolds, Searight, & Ratwik, 2014) mixed in with their preocupational thoughts about others availability and stability of their relationships.
Wandering minds, wandering mice: Computer mouse tracking as a method to detect mind wandering
2020, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :For example, mind wandering may begin during an underarousing, monotonous circumstance. As we try extricate ourselves from this, arousal levels rise, reaching a peak when our efforts to engage in stimulating activities fail, accompanied by feelings of restlessness (Danckert, Hammerschmidt, Marty-Dugas, & Smilek, 2018). In line with this, pupillary measures suggest mind wandering to be associated with changes in arousal states (Unsworth & Robison, 2017, 2018).
Title: Boredom as a basis for fostering creativity in higher education: A call for pedagogical bravery
2024, Innovations in Education and Teaching InternationalMusic and Boredom: A First Insight Into an Unexplored Relationship
2023, Music and Science