Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Languages of the Law: An Integrated View From Vico and Conceptual Metaphor Theory

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Work on the relation between figurative language and the law is a fairly recent trend, within legal discourse studies, linguistics, and semiotics. The work in conceptual metaphor theory, for example, is starting to unpack the underlying metaphorical and metonymic structure of legal language, producing some new and important insights into the nature of this language. Missing from this emerging line of inquiry are the views of the Neapolitan philosopher Giambattista Vico, who was the first to understand the power of figurative language in the creation of symbolic systems, like language and the law. His tripartite evolutionary model of language shows that there is not one language of the law, but three “languages.” By integrating Vico’s model with the work in conceptual metaphor theory it will be possible to penetrate the underlying conceptual structure of legal discourse and thus lead to a more insightful science of this discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brienza, P., and N. Couto. 2008. Paradox and origin: On the structure of legal communication. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 1: 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Danesi, Marcel. 1987. A Vichian footnote to Nietzsche’s views on the cognitive primacy of metaphor: An addendum to Schrift. New Vico Studies 5: 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danesi, Marcel. 1993. Vico, metaphor, and the origin of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danesi, Marcel. 1995. Vico and the cognitive science enterprise. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Danesi, Marcel. 2004. Poetic logic: The role of metaphor in thought, language, and culture. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garin, Eugenio. 1972. Ancora sul ‘verum-factum’ prima di Vico. Bollettino del Centro di Studi Vichiani 2: 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grassi, Ernesto. 1980. Rhetoric as philosophy: The humanist tradition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris, J.A. 1985. Recognizing legal tropes: Metonymy as manipulative mode. The American University Law Review 34: 1215–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutton, C. 2009. Language, meaning and the law. Glasgow: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jakobson, Roman. 1978. Six lectures on sound and meaning (trans: John Mepham). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  12. Jakobson, Roman. 1980. The framework of language. Ann Arbor: Michigan Studies in the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kevelson, Roberta. 1991. Peirce and law: Issue in pragmatism, legal realism, and semiotics. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lakoff, George. 2008. The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lakoff, George. 2008. The neural theory of metaphor. In The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, ed. R.W.J. Gibbs, 23–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Langer, Susan K. 1948. Philosophy in a new key. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lotman, Jurij M. 1991. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maiullari, Maria Teresa. 1994. Giambattista Vico (1668–1744). Prospects: The Quarterly Review of Comparative Education 24: 731–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mattila, H.E.S. 2006. Comparative legal linguistics. Ashgate Publishing (reprint).

  23. Mellinkoff, D. 2004. The language of the law. Resource Publications (reprint).

  24. Mondolfo, R. 1969. Il “verum-factum” prima di Vico. Napoli: Guida.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mootz, F.J. 2008. Vico, Llewellyn and the task of legal education. UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research. Paper no. 09-15.

  26. Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1958. Collected papers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  27. Romanita, J., Loredana, F., and Luminita, F. 2009. Metaphors in legal discourse. Paper delivered at the first conference of the center for research on the applications of language. Universidad de la Rioja.

  28. Schane, Sanford A. 2006. Language and the law. London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sebeok, Thomas A. 1987. In what sense is language a primary modeling system? In Proceedings of the 25th symposium of the Tartu-Moscow school of semiotics, ed. H. Broms and R. Kaufmann, 67–80. Helsinki: Arator.

  30. Smith, M.R. 2007. Levels of metaphor in persuasive legal writing. Mercer Law Review 58: 919–947.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sullivan, M. 2008. On Vico’s Universal Law and modern law. New Vico Studies 26: 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Verene, Donald P. 1981. Vico’s science of imagination. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vico, Giambattista B. 1963. Autobiography of Giambattista Vico (trans: M. Fisch). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  34. Vico, Giambattista B. 1984. The new science of Giambattista Vico (trans: T. G. Bergin and M. Fisch). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  35. Vico, Giambattista B. 1990. On the study methods of our time (trans: E. Gianturco). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  36. Vico, Giambattista B. 1996. The art of rhetoric. Rodopi: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vico, Giambattista B. 2000. Universal right (trans: G. Pinton and M. Dieh). Rodopi: Amsterdam.

  38. Vico, Giambattista B. 2005. On the constancy of the jurisprudent (trans: J. Schaeffer). Special Issue of New Vico Studies, 23. Atlanta: The Institute for Vico Studies.

  39. Vinje, J.-W. 2011. Thomas Middleton’s legal duel: A cognitive approach. Early Modern Culture Online 2: 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wagner, A., and J.M. Broekman (eds.). 2010. Prospects of legal semiotics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. White, Hayden V. 1973. Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. White, Hayden V. 1978. Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1K7, Canada

    Marcel Danesi

Authors
  1. Marcel Danesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Danesi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danesi, M. The Languages of the Law: An Integrated View From Vico and Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Int J Semiot Law 25, 95–106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-011-9250-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-011-9250-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation