Skip to main content
Log in

Transparency and doubt: Understanding and interpretation in pragmatics and in law

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarnio, A., On Legal Reasoning (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio, A., Denkweisen der Rechtswissenschaft (Vienna-New York: Springer Verlag, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio, A., Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence (Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio, A., ‘Paradigm of legal dogmatics’, in A. Peczenik et al. (eds.), Theory of Legal Science (Dordrecht. Reidel, 1984) pp. 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld, A. and P. Nicole, La Logique ou l'Art de Penser, ed. with an introduction by L. Marin (based on the fifth edition of 1683) (Paris: Flammarion, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M., ‘Conversational relevance’, Journal of Pragmatics 1 (1977): 309–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M., La Sémiologie de Leibniz (Paris: Aubier, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M., Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Mind I: Thought in Language (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M., ‘Language Use in Jokes and Dreams: Sociopragmatics vs. Psychopragmatics’, Language and Communication 5 (1985): 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M., ‘Language and Reasoning: Sorting Out Sociopragmatic and Psychopragmatic Factors’, in J. C. Boudreaux, B. W. Hamil, and R. Jernigan (eds.), The Role of Language in Problem Solving 2 (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987, pp. 183–97).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. [forthcoming a]. ‘The Controversy Over Ideas and the Idea of Controversy’, in F. Gil (ed.), Scientific and Philosophical Controversies (Evora: Universidade de Evora Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. [forthcoming b], ‘Hermeneutic Interpretation and Pragmatic Interpretation’, Philosophy and Rhetoric.

  • Dascal, M. and Weizman, E., ‘Contextual Exploitation of Interpretation Clues in Text Understanding: An Integrated Model’, in M. B. Pappi and J. Verschueren (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987), pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominicy, M., La Naissance de la Grammaire Moderne (Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrajoli, L., ‘Interpretazione Dottrinale e Interpretazione Operativa’, Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 1 (1966): 290–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosterus, V G., Interpres sive de interpretatione juris libri duo (Wittenberga: Suintibus Clementis Bergeri, 1613).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G., Philosophical Hermeneutics, transl. and ed. by D. E. Linge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, Alessandro, La Definizione Aristotelica della Giustizia: Metodo Dialettico e Analisi del Linguaggio Normativo (Perugia: Edizioni Universitarie, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gizbert-Studnicki, T., Jezyk prawny z perspektywy socjolingwistycznej [Legal language from a sociolinguistic perspective]. (Warszawa/Krakow: Panstowe Widawnictwo Naukowe, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, M. P., Philosophy of Law (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G., The Logic of Choice (London: Allen and Unwin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kerchove, M., ‘La doctrine du sens clair et la jurisprudence de la cour de cassation de Belgique’, in M. van der Kerchove (ed.), L'interprétation en Droit: Approche pluridisciplinaire (Bruxelles: Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint Louis, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kerchove, M., ‘La théorie des acres de language et la théorie de l'interprétation’, in P. Amselek (ed.), Théorie des Acres de Language, Éthique, et le Droit (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W [A], Sämtliche Schrieften und Briefe, herausgegeben von der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1923-. Quoted by series, volume, pages.

  • Makkonen, K., Zur Problematik der juridischen Entscheidung (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleszka, K. and Gizbert-Studnicki, T., ‘Dwa ujecia wykladni prawa: proba konfrontacji’ [Two approaches toward interpretation of laws: an attempt at confrontation]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagielonskiego, grace z nauk politycznych 20 (1984):17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, H., Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1911).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Savigny, F. C., System des heutigen römischen Rechts (Berlin: Veit & Co., 1849).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, P., ‘Elegance in Law’, Law Quarterly Review 77 (1961):242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. L., Ethics and Language (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarello, G., L'interpretazione della Legge (Milano: A. Giuffre, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R M., Knowledge and Politics (New York: The Free Press, and London: Collier Macmillan, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., Zagadnienia teorii wykladni prawa ludowego [Problems of the Theory of Interpretation of the People's Law] (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo prawnicze, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., ‘L'interpretation en droit: théorie et idéologie’, Archives de Philosophie du Droit 17 (1972):51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., Meaning and Truth in Judicial Decision, 2nd ed. (Helsinki: A-Tyeto Oy, 1983a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., ‘Fuzziness of Legal System’, in Essays in Legal Theory in Honor of K. Makkonen [XV Oikeustiede jurisprudential], (1983b) pp. 313–30.

  • Wróblewski, J., Constitución y teoría general de la interpretación juridica (Madrid: Civitas, 1985a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., ‘Rational Law-Maker and Interpretative Choices”, Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 1 (1985b):129–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., ‘Legal Language and Legal Interpretation’, Law and Philosophy 4 (1985c):239–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuleta Puceiro, E., Paradigma dogmatico y ciencia del derecho (Madrid: Editoriales de Derecho Reunidas, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence on this paper and offprint requests should be addressed to Professor Marcelo Dascal, Department of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. We thank Dennis Kurzon for helpful remarks on an early draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dascal, M., Wróblewski, J. Transparency and doubt: Understanding and interpretation in pragmatics and in law. Law Philos 7, 203–224 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144156

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144156

Keywords

Navigation