Abstract
In this paper, the need of increasing transdisciplinarity research is advocated. After having set out some peculiarity of transdisciplinarity compared with related concepts such as multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, four evolutionary stages of scientific disciplines, based on a model recently proposed (Shneider in Trends Biochem Sci 34:217–223, 2009) are presented. This model is then applied to the case of Plant Physiology in order to attempt an evaluation of the potential for transdisciplinary engagement of the discipline, and each of the four stages of the discipline is evaluated. In conclusion, some future perspectives of Plant Physiology are sketched with reference to its transdisciplinary potential.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnon DI, Murneek AE, Goddard DR, Machlis L, Kramer PJ, Parker MW, Thimann KV (1950) Preface by the editor. Annu Rev Plant Phys 1:1
Briggs RW (1988) Preface by the editor. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39:1
Brüsh B (2006) The emerging field of plant physiology: Heinrich Friedrich Link, Mathias Jacob Schleiden and the Jahresberichte für physiologische Botanik. http://vlp.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/essays/data. Cited 22 Apr 2014
Chrispeels MJ (1996) Editorial. Plant Physiol 112:1–2
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (2004) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. The National Academies Press, Washington
Cui J, He P, Liu F, Tan J, Chen L, Fenn J (2012) Editorial: 60 years of development of the Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. J Integr Plant Biol 54:682–702
Delmer D (2002) Preface by the editor. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:53
Dogan M (2001) Specialization and recombination of specialties in the social sciences. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, vol 22. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 14851–14855
Falcon A (2012) Aristotle on causality. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 edn). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/aristotle-causality/. Cited 26 Mar 2014
Hopkins WG, Hüner PA (2009) Introduction to plant physiology, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10
Klein JT (2003) Unity of knowledge and transdisciplinarity: contexts of definition, theory and the new discourse of problem solving. In: Hadorn GH (ed) Unity of knowledge (in transdisciplinary research for sustainability). Encyclopedia of life support systems. EOLSS/UNESCO, UK
Klein JT (2004) Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:515–526
Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water relations of plants and soils. Academic Press, San Diego
Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Maggio A, Zhu J-K, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA (2006) Osmogenetics: aristotle to arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:1542–1557
Matthews JA, Herbert DT (2004) Unity of geography. Prospects for the discipline. In: Matthew JA, Herbert DT (eds) Unifying geography. Common heritage, shared future. Routledge, New York
Max-Neef M (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol Econ 53:5–16
Medd W, Chappells H (2007) Drought, demand and the scale of resilience: challenges for interdisciplinarity in practice. Interdiscip Sci Rev 32:233–248
Mollinga PP (2010) Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Sci 50:S1–S9
Nicolescu B (2002) Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. State University of New York Press, Albany
Nobel PS (2009) Physichochemical and environmental plant physiology, 4th edn. Academic Press, Burlington
Østreng W (2008) Crossing boundaries by way of disciplines. In: Østreng W (ed) Complexity. Interdisciplinary communications 2006/2007. Centre for Advanced Study at the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo
Pombo O (2005) Interdisciplinaridade e integração dos saberes. Liinc em Revista 1(1):3–15
Renton M (2013) Aristotle and adding an evolutionary perspective to models of plant architecture in changing environments. Front Plant Sci 4:284
Repko AF (2012) Interdisciplinary research: process and theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Rumpho ME, Pelletreau KN, Moustafa A, Bhattacharya D (2011) The making of a photosynthetic animal. J Exp Biol 214:303–311
Shneider AM (2009) Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist. Trends Biochem Sci 34:217–223
Shull CA, Lipman CB, Livingston BE, Ball CR, Lloyd FE (1926) Editorial. Plant Physiol 1:1–2
Taiz L, Zeiger E (2010) Plant Physiology, 5th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Thanos CA (1994) Aristotle and Theophrastus on plant-animal interactions. In: Arianoutsou M, Groves RH (eds) Plant-animal interactions in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
van Niel CB (1932) On the morphology and physiology of the purple and green sulfur bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 3:1–112
Vasbinder JW, Nanyang BA, Arthur WB (2010) Transdisciplinary EU science institute needs funds urgently. Nature 463:876
Vieira S, Ribeiro L, Jesus B, Cartaxana P, Marques da Silva J (2013) Photosynthesis assessment in microphytobenthos with conventional and imaging pulse amplitude modulation fluorometry. Photochem and Photobiol 89:97–102
Zierhofer W, Burger P (2007) Disentangling transdisciplinarity: an analysis of knowledge integration in problem-oriented research. Science Studies 20:51–74
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marques da Silva, J., Casetta, E. The Evolutionary Stages of Plant Physiology and a Plea for Transdisciplinarity. Axiomathes 25, 205–215 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-014-9257-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-014-9257-4