Abstract
Promoting patient autonomy has become a key imperative in health service encounters. We will examine the potential negative effects of over-promoting patient autonomy and consider the impact on patient access, their experience and the provision of equitable services by focusing on an extreme manifestation of this trend, i.e. calls for patient involvement in health care decision making to be mandatory. Advocates of mandatory autonomy hold that patients have a duty to themselves, to society and to the medical system to make decisions on their health care independently. Models of mandatory autonomy may be contrasted to those of optional autonomy that seek to ascertain patients’ decisional preferences and to understand wider limitations on their freedom to choose. Where choice as decisional responsibility becomes mandatory it ceases to promote agency and where autonomous choice is understood as an individualistic practice it will contribute to the cultural dominance of Western values. Moreover, taking a view that principlist ethics needs to take account of the social and cultural contexts of individual lives, we argue that if mandatory autonomy were to be over-emphasised as part of an ongoing move towards patient choice in UK National Health Service (NHS), educated and affluent people would be more able to exercise choices at the expense of people who are experienced in asserting preferences and who have the resources to make use of choices. We will argue that the promotion of autonomy needs to be tempered by steps to enable less powerful social, cultural and economic groups to contribute to decision making and to support individuals who may feel abandoned by having decisional responsibility transferred to them. Until constraints on individual choice can be understood and addressed, we advocate the model of optional autonomy used in shared decision making and make recommendations for practice, policy, education and research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, W., Baker, M., & Kernohan, E. (1991). General practitioners’ perceptions of Asian and non-Asian patients. Family Practice, 8, 52–56.
Alexander, Z. (1999). Department of health study of ethnic minority issues. London: Department of Health.
Black, D. (1980). Inequalities in health: The black report. London: Department of Health and Social Security.
Boulton, M., Tuckett, D., Olson, C., & Williams, A. (1986). Social class and the general practice consultation. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8(4), 325–350.
Bowler, I. (1993). They’re not the same as us: Midwives’ stereotypes of South Asian descent maternity patients. Sociology of Health and Illness, 15(2), 157–177.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine, 49(5), 651–661.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., & O’Brien, M. A. (2006). Cultural influences on the physician–patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(3), 262–267.
Clouser, K., & Gert, B. (1990). A critique of principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15, 219–236.
Coulter, A. (1999). Paternalism or partnership?: Patients have grown up—And there’s no going back. BMJ, 319(7212), 719–720.
Coulter, A. (2002). After Bristol: Putting patients at the centre. BMJ, 324, 648–651.
Davies, M. (2005). Narrating Arab Muslim women’s identities in London: Storytelling and the cultural dimensions of the information-giving encounter. Ph.D. thesis. London: Middlesex University.
Davies, M., & Elwyn, G. (2006). Optional versus mandatory autonomy of patients in shared decision making. In S. Buetow, & T. Kenealy (Eds.), Ideological debates in family medicine. New York: Nova Science Publications (in press).
Davies, M. M., & Papadopoulos, I. (2006). Notions of Motherhood and the maternity needs of Arab Muslim women. In I. Papadopoulos (Ed.), Transcultural health and social care: The development of culturally competent practitioners (pp.145–161). London: Churchill Livingstone.
de Grazia, D. (1992). Moving forward in bioethical theory: Theories cases and specified principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17, 511–539.
Department of Health. (1989). Working for patients. London: HMSO.
Dixon, A., Le Grand, J., Henderson, J., Murray, R., & Potelikhoff, E. (2003). Is the NHS equitable? A reivew of the evidence, LSE health and social care discussion paper. London: London School of Economics.
Dodds, S. (2000). Choice and control in feminist bioethics. In C. Mackenzie, & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy in context: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self (pp. 213–235). New York: Oxford University Press.
Eddy, D. (1990a). Anatomy of a decision. JAMA, 263, 441–443.
Eddy, D. (1990b). Clinical decision making: From theory to practice. Connecting value and costs. Whom do we ask, and what do we ask them? JAMA, 264(13), 1737–1739.
Eddy, D. (1991). Clinical decision making: From theory to practice. The individual vs society. Resolving the conflict. JAMA, 265(18), 2399–2401.
Elwyn, G., O’Connor, A., Stacey, D., Volk, R., Edwards, A., Coulter, A., Thomson, R., Barratt, A., Barry, M., Bernstein, S., Butow, P., Clarke, A., Entwistle, V., Feldman-Stewart, D., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Moumjid, N., Mulley, A., Ruland, C., Sepucha, K., Sykes, A., Whelan, T., & (IPDAS) Collaboration. (2006). Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ, 333(7565), 417.
Ende, J., Kazis, L., & Moskowitz, M. (1990). Preferences for autonomy when patients are physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 5(6), 506–509.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock Publications.
Friedman, M. (2000). Feminism in ethics: Conceptions of autonomy. In M. Fricker, & J. Hornsby (Eds.), The cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R. (1991). Health-related quality of life in patient decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 69–70.
Kirkham, M. (1989). Midwives and information-giving during labour. In S. Robinson, & A. M. Thomson (Eds.), Midwives, research and childbirth. London: Chapman & Hall.
Menzel, P. (1992). Equality, autonomy, and efficiency: What health care system should we have? Journal of Medicine Philosophy, 17(1), 32–57.
Mill, J. (1962). On liberty. New York, NY: New American Library.
Morreim, E. (1995). Balancing act: The new medical ethics of medicine’s new economics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Murtagh, M., & Hepworth, J. (2003). Menopause as a long-term risk to health: Implications of general practitioner accounts of prevention for women’s choice and decision-making. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(2), 185–207.
NHS. (2000). The NHS plan. Leeds: NHS England.
Quill, T., & Cassel, C. (1995). Nonabandonment: A central obligation for physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 122, 368–374.
Rozario, S. (2005). Genetics, religion and identity among British Bangladeshis: Some initial findings. Diversity in Health and Social Care, 2, 187–196.
Sartre, J.-P. (1948). Being and nothingness. New York: Philosophical Library.
Sartre, J.-P. (1968). Search for a method. New York: Washington Square Press.
Schneider, C. (1998). The practice of autonomy: Patients, doctors, and medical decisions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sherwin, S. (2001). Normalizing reproductive technologies and the implications for autonomy. In R. Tong, G. Anderson, & A. Santos (Eds.), Globalizing feminist bioethics: Crosscultural perspectives (pp. 96–113). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Williams, G. (1983). The movement for independent living: An evaluation and critique. Social Science and Medicine, 17(15), 1003–1010.
Wolff, R. (1973). The autonomy of reason. New York: Harper Collins.
Wright, C. (1983). Language and communication problems in an Asian community. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 33, 101–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, M., Elwyn, G. Advocating Mandatory Patient ‘Autonomy’ in Healthcare: Adverse Reactions and Side Effects. Health Care Anal 16, 315–328 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0075-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0075-3