Skip to main content
Log in

Fair Drug Prices and the Patent System

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses John Rawls' theory of justice to defend the patent system against charges that it has an unfair effect on access to medications, from the perspective of national and international justice. The paper argues that the patent system is fair in a national context because it respects intellectual property rights and it benefits the least advantaged members of society by providing incentives for inventors, investors, and entrepreneurs. The paper also argues that the patent system is fair in an international context, provided that developed nations take steps to help disease-stricken countries secure internal justice. Fairness in a national or international context also requires that the patent system should include emergency exceptions to deal with short-term inequities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Angell, M. (2000) The Pharmaceutical Industry—To Whom is it Accountable? The New England Journal of Medicine 342, 1902–1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. (1998) International Justice: Conflict. In R. Chadwick, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Vol. 2), pp. 871–874. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. (1999) Political Theory and International Relations, (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best-Online Pharmacy.com. (2003) Amoxycillin. Available at: http://www.best-online-pharmacies. com/prescription-drugs/prescription-drugs-amoxycillin.html

  • Bian, T. (1997) The Drug Lords: America's Pharmaceutical Cartel. New York: No Barriers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildt, C. (2003, January 7) Fight Poverty, Not Patents. The Wall Street Journal, p. A13.

  • Blustein, P. (2003, February 1) Activists Hail President's Call for More Funding to Fight AIDS. The Washington Post, pp. A12.

  • Bodenheimer, T. (2000) Uneasy Alliance: Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry. The New England Journal of Medicine 342, 1539–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B. (1995) Ethical Issues in Drug Testing, Approval, and Pricing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B. (1996) Public Goods and Fair Prices: Balancing Technological Innovation and Social Well Being. Hastings Center Report 26(2), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (1984) Just Health Care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diller, L. (1996) The Run on Ritalin: Attention Deficit Disorder and Stimulant Treatment in the 1990s. Hastings Center Report 26(2), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enserink, M. (2003) Bill Gates Plans a Hit List, with NIH's Help. Science 299, 641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhammer, A. (2001) Current Issues in Clinical Research and the Development of New Pharmaceu-ticals. Accountability in Research 8, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1975) Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? American Political Science Review 69, 594–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1976) Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headden, S. (1997, September 1) The Big Pill Push. U.S. News and World Report, pp. 67–71.

  • Hewitt, W. (1967) Penicillin: Historical Impact on Infection Control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 145, 212–215

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (1997, Winter/Spring) The Evolution of Today's Calculator. International Calculator Col-lector 15/16, p. 1, 4. Available at: http://www.vintagecalculators.com/html/evolutionoftoday's-calculato. html

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacayo, A. (2003) Seeking a Balance: International Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, Public Health Crises, and the Emerging Threat of Bio-terrorism. University of Miami International-American Law Review 33, 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loff, B. (2002) World Trade Organization Wrestles with Access to Cheap Drugs Solution. The Lancet 360, 1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzer, J. (2002) Is Canada American's Favorite Drugstore? Medical Post 38(46), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsa, L. (1999) Prescription for Profits: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Bankrolled the Unholy Marriage Between Science and Business. New York: Scribner. Mill, J.S. (1861 [1979]) Utilitari-anism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., and Davis, M. (2000) Intellectual Property. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerozzi, M. (2002) The Battle Over Life-Saving Pharmaceuticals: Are Developing Countries Being ‘TRIPped’ by Developed Countries? Villanova Law Review 47, 605–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obsolete Technology Website. (2003) Apple III. Available at: http://oldcomputers.net/appleiii.html

  • O'Neill, O. (1998) International Justice: Distribution. In R. Chadwick, (Ed.)., Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, (Vol. 2), pp. 874–877. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pear, R. (2002, December 25) Law Requiring Lower Drug Prices in Struck Down. The New York Times, p. A1.

  • Pear, R. (2003, January 3) Bush May Link Drug Benefit in Medicare to Private Plans. The New York Times,p.A1.

  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturing Association (PhRMA). (2003a) Research and Develop-ment. Washington, DC: PhRMA. Available at: www.phrma.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturing Association (PhRMA). (2003b) Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: PhRMA. Available at: www.phrma.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1974 [circa 400 BC]) The Republic. (G. Grube, (transl). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of the Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2002) Justice As Fairness: A Restatement. E. Kelly, (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-versity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, M. (2000) The Global Drug Gap. Science 287, 1979–1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. (2001) Developing Drugs for the Developing World: An Economic, Legal, Moral, and Political Dilemma. Developing World Bioethics 1,11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D., and De Ville, K. (2002) Bioterrorism and Patent Rights: Compulsory Licensure and the Case of Cipro. American Journal of Bioethics 2(3), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, M. (1987) Choice: An Introduction to Decision Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1980) Economics (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaafsma, P. (1997) An Economic Overview of Patents. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 79, 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A., and Resnik, D. (2002) Responsible Conduct of Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1972) Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, S. (2003, February 2) The White House Gets Religion on AIDS in Africa. The New York Times,p.A1.

  • Stolberg, S., and Gerth, J. (2000, April 23) Medicine Merchants: Holding Down the Competition. The New York Times,p.A1.

  • U.S. Constitution. (1787) Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.

  • Wreen, M. (1998) Patents. In R. Chadwick, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Vol. 3), New York: Academic. pp. 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Resnik, D.B. Fair Drug Prices and the Patent System. Health Care Analysis 12, 91–115 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041185.52817.8c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041185.52817.8c

Navigation