Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T23:43:34.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Plainly of Considerable Moment in Human Society’: Francis Hutcheson and Polite Laughter in Eighteenth-Century Britain and Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Kate Davison
Kate Davison*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
*
kate.davison@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on Francis Hutcheson's Reflections Upon Laughter, which was originally published in 1725 as a series of three letters to The Dublin Journal during his time in the city. Although rarely considered a significant example of Hutcheson's published work, Reflections Upon Laughter has long been recognised in the philosophy of laughter as a foundational contribution to the ‘incongruity theory’ – one of the ‘big three’ theories of laughter, and that which is still considered the most credible by modern theorists. The article gives an account of Hutcheson's text but, rather than evaluating it solely as an explanation of laughter, the approach taken is an historical one: it emphasises the need to reconnect the theory to the cultural and intellectual contexts in which it was published and to identify the significance of Hutcheson's arguments in time and place. Through this, the article argues that Hutcheson's theory of laughter is indicative of the perceived significance of human risibility in early eighteenth-century Britain and Ireland and, more broadly, that it contributed both to moral philosophical debate and polite conduct guidance.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 88: Irish Philosophy in the Age of Berkeley , October 2020 , pp. 143 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon., The Nut-Cracker (London, 1751).Google Scholar
Anon., The Laugher; or, the Art of Jesting (London, 1760).Google Scholar
Anon., The Polite Academy, or School of Behaviour for Young Gentlemen and Ladies (London, 1762).Google Scholar
Apte, Mahadev L., Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach (London: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Barry, Jonathan, ‘Literacy and Literature in Popular Culture: Reading and Writing in Historical Perspective’ in Harris, Tim (ed.), Popular Culture in England, c.1500–1850 (London: Macmillan, 1997), 76–79.Google Scholar
Beattie, James, ‘On Laughter and Ludicrous Composition’ in Essays (London, 1776).Google Scholar
Benson, Charles, ‘The Irish Trade’ in Michael, F, Suarez, SJ, and Turner, Michael L. (eds), The Cambridge History of Book in Britain, Volume 5: 1695–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 366–82.10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilger, Audrey, Laughing Feminism: Subversive Comedy in Frances Burney, Maria Edgeworth and Jane Austen (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Borsay, Peter, The English Urban Renaissance: Culture and Society in the Provincial Town (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989).Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan and Roodenburg, Herman, ‘Introduction’ in Bremmer, Jan and Roodenburg, Herman (eds), A Cultural History of Humour: From Antiquity to the Present Day, (Cambridge: Polity, 1997).Google Scholar
Brewer, John, The Pleasures of the Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century (London: Harper Collins, 1997).Google Scholar
Brown, Pamela Allen, Better a Shrew than a Sheep: Women, Drama, and the Culture of Jest in Early Modern England (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Bryson, Anna, From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël, Humour: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).10.1093/actrade/9780199552221.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Anthony Ashley, third earl of Shaftesbury, The Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (3 vols, London, 1711).Google Scholar
Cowan, Brian, The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse (London: Yale University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert, The Great Cat Massacre and other Episodes in French History (London: Allen Lane, 1984).Google Scholar
Davison, Kate, ‘Occasional Politeness and Gentlemen's Laughter in 18th Century England’, The Historical Journal, 57 (2014), 921–945.10.1017/S0018246X14000302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, Simon, Cruelty and Laughter: Forgotten Comic Literature and the Unsentimental Eighteenth Century (London: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dobrée, Bonamy (ed.), The Letters of Philip Dormer Stanhope 4th earl of Chesterfield, (6 vols, London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1932).Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975).Google Scholar
Fordyce, James, Sermons to Young Women, 2nd edn. (2 vols, London, 1766), I, 192–93.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious [1905], trans. Strachey, James (New York: Penguin, 1974).Google Scholar
Gatrell, Vic, City of Laughter: Sex and Satire in Eighteenth-Century London (London: Walker and Company, 2006).Google Scholar
Gervais, M. and Wilson, D. S., ‘The Evolution and Functions of Laughter and Humor: A Synthetic Approach’, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80 (2005), 395–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilhus, Ingvild Saelid, Laughing Gods and Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion (London, Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Gregory, John, A Father's Legacy to his Daughters, 4th edn. (London, 1774).Google Scholar
Grose, Francis, A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue (London, 1785).Google Scholar
Harris, James A., ‘Shaftesbury, Hutcheson and the Moral Sense’ in Golob, Sacha and Timmermann, Jens (eds), The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan [1651], /ed. Macpherson, C. B. (London: Penguin, 1968).Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis, Reflections Upon Laughter, and Remarks Upon the Fable of the Bees (Glasgow, 1750).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgment [1790], trans., Meredith, James Creed (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Máire, ‘“Politicks, Coffee and News”: The Dublin Book Trade in the Eighteenth Century’, Dublin Historical Record, 58 (2005), 76–85.Google Scholar
Klein, Lawrence E., Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence E., ‘Politeness and the Interpretation of the British Eighteenth Century’, The Historical Journal, 45 (2002), 869–98.10.1017/S0018246X02002716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence E., ‘Ridicule as a Tool for Discovering Truth’ in Bullard, Paddy (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, (Oxford Handbooks Online, 2019).Google Scholar
Knights, Mark and Morton, Adam, ‘Introduction’ in Knights, Mark and Morton, Adam (eds), The Power of Laughter and Satire in Early Modern Britain: Political and Religious Culture, 1500–1820 (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2017), 1–26.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul, ‘The Uses of Eighteenth-Century Politeness’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, series 6, 12 (2002), 311–32.10.1017/S0080440102000129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavan, Nadine, Rankin, Georgia, Lorking, Nicole, Scott, Sophie, McGettigan, Carolyn, ‘Neural Correlates of the Affective Properties of Spontaneous and Volitional Laughter Types’, Neuropsychologia, 95 (2017), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London, 1690).10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, Roger, Ridicule, Religion and the Politics of Wit in Augustan England (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A., The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach (Elsevier Science & Technology, 2006).Google Scholar
Marshall, Ashley, The Practice of Satire in England, 1658–1770 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McDonald, Paul, The Philosophy of Humour (Penrith: Humanities-Ebooks, 2012).Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich, Gedanken von Scherzen [Hemmerde, 1744], trans. Anon., The Merry Philosopher; or, Thoughts on Jesting (London, 1765).Google Scholar
Morreall, John (ed.), The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor (Albany, NY: State of New York Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Morreall, John, Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Laughter (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Ian and Prescott, Anne Lake, ‘Jest Books’ in Hadfield, Andrew (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of English Prose 1500–1640 (Oxford: Oxford University press, 2013), 343–58.Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, Michele, The English Wits: Literature and Sociability in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy, ‘Enlightenment and Pleasure’ in Porter, Roy and Roberts, Marie Mulvey (eds), Pleasure in the Eighteenth-Century (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, Robert, ‘Laughter’, American Scientist, 84 (1996), 38–45.Google Scholar
Provine, Robert, Laughter: A Scientific Investigation (London: Faber, 2002).Google Scholar
Roecklein, J., The Psychology of Humor: A Reference Guide and Annotated Bibliography (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2002).Google Scholar
Screech, Michael A., Laughter at the Foot of the Cross (London: Allen Lane, 1997).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Idea [1819], trans., Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J., 6th edn. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Shrank, Cathy, ‘Mocking of Mirthful? Laughter in the Early Modern Dialogue’ in Knights and Morton, The Power of Laughter and Satire in Early Modern Britain: Political and Religious Culture, 1500–1820 (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2017), 48–66.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Why Laughing Mattered in the Renaissance’, History of Political Thought, 22 (2001), 418–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Smilewell, Samuel, The Art of Joking (London, 1774).Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan, A Treatise on Polite Conversation (London, 1738).Google Scholar
Telfer, Elizabeth, ‘Hutcheson's Reflections Upon Laughter’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53 (1995), 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Keith, ‘The Place of Laughter in Tudor and Stuart England’, Times Literary Supplement (21 January 1977), 77–81.Google Scholar
Verberckmoes, Johan, ‘Humour and History: A Research Bibliography’ in Bremmer, Jan and Roodenburg, Herman (eds), A Cultural History of Humour: From Antiquity to the Present Day, (Cambridge: Polity, 1997), 242–252.Google Scholar
Verberckmoes, John, Laughter, Jestbooks and Society in the Spanish Netherlands (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Ned, Wine and Wisdom; or, the Tipling Philosophers (London, 1710).Google Scholar
Withington, Phil, Society in Early Modern England: The Vernacular Origins of some Powerful Ideas (Cambridge: Polity, 2010).Google Scholar
Ylivuori, Soile, Women and Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England: Bodies, Identities, and Power (New York: Routledge, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar