Skip to main content
Log in

The basis and relevance of emotional dignity

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is a preliminary examination of the origin and role of psychological perception or “feeling” of dignity in human beings. Following Ayala's naturalistic account of morality, a sense of emotional dignity is seen as an outcome of processes of natural selection, cultural evolution, and above all a need for social inclusion. It is suggested that the existence of emotional dignity as part of a human species-related continuum provides an explanation of why we treat those in a persistent vegetative state, the severely and hopelessly mentally impaired, the senile demented, cadavers and archaeological remains with dignity and respect. For older Europeans, dissonance between physical and mental abilities, unfamiliarity with social and cultural changes and relative proximity to death may influence their emotional dignity and hence vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, F.J.: 1995, ‘The Difference of Being Human’, in: Holmes Rolston III (ed.), Biology, Ethics and the Origins of Life. Boston: Jones and Bartlett. [Also available via website:http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/evolution/perspectives/ayala.htm]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, P.: 1984, ‘Do Not Disturb? Archaeology and the Rights of the Dead’, J Applied Philosophy 1(2), 213-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S.: 1999, The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M.: 1994, ‘Artificial intelligence and human dignity', in: J. Cornwell (ed.), Nature’s Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby: 2000, ‘Evolutionary Psychology and the Emotions’, in: M. Lewis and J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of Emotions (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A.: 1994, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R.: 2001, ‘Self-Forgiveness and Self-Respect’, Ethics 112, 53-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1989, ‘The Origins of Selves’, Cogito 3, 163-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P.: 1999, ‘Basic Emotions’, Chapter 3, in: T. Dalgleish, and M. Power, (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Sussex: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J.: 1993, ‘Harm to Others’, Chapter 10, in: J. M. Fischer (ed.), The Metaphysics of Death. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A.: 1990, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A.: 1993, ‘Sociobiology’, Chapter 35, in: R.E. Goodin, and P.A. Pettit (eds.), Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstick, D.: 1988, ‘The Welfare of the Dead’, Philosophy 63, 111 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G.W.: 1997, Dignity and vulnerability: Strength and quality of character. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G.W.: 1999, Agent-centred morality: An Aristotelian alternative to Kantian Internalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helman, C.G.: 1990, Culture, Health and Illness (2nd edn.). London: Wright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A.J.: 1984, ‘On Behalf of Moderate Speciesism’, J Applied Philosophy 1(2), 281-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1739–40/1888, A Treatise of Human Nature. L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.) (revised 2nd edn. by P.H. Nidditch, 1978). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A.: 1973, ‘The Limits of Man and His Predicament’, in: J. Benthall (ed.), The Limits of Human Nature. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korner, S.: 1990, Kant. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M.: 1999, ‘The Social and Psychological Importance of Self-Esteem’, in: R.M. Kowalski and M.R. Leary (eds.), The Social Psychology of Emotional and Behavioral Problems. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M.R. and Downs, D.L.: 1995, ‘Functions of the Self-Esteem Motive’, in: M.H. Kernis (ed.), Efficacy, Agency and Self-Esteem. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. and J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds.): 2000, Handbook of Emotions (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: 1706, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (abridgement by J.W. Yolton (1991 reissue)). London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R.: 1990, ‘Evolutionary Explanations of Emotions’, Human Nature 1, 261-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R.: 1998, ‘Emotional Disorders in Evolutionary Perspective’, British J Medical Psychology 71, 397-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. and G. Williams: 1995, Evolution and Healing: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.: ‘Dignity and the Care of the Elderly’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6, 103-110.

  • O'Neill, O.: 1989. Constructions of reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, E.: 1981, ‘Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect’, Ethics 91, 243-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1993, A System of Pragmatic Idealism: Volume II: The Validity of Values. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston III, H.: 1999, Genes, Genesis and Gods: Values and their origins in natural and human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. and S. Rose: 2000, Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtz, D.: 1995, Rational Choice and Moral Agency. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, D.: 2000, ‘Humiliation, Dignity and Self-Respect’, Philosophical Psychology 13, 523-540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusted, J.: 1987, Moral Principles and Social Values. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.S.: 1987, Medical Power and Social Knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O.: 1999, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badcott, D. The basis and relevance of emotional dignity. Med Health Care Philos 6, 123–131 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024166912191

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024166912191

Navigation