Skip to main content
Log in

Interpreting Anselm as logician

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Burali-Forti, C.: 1897, ‘Una questione sui numeri transfiniti’, Rendiconti Circolo Matematico di Palermo 11, 154–164 and 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. M.: 1964, Human Freedom and the Self. The Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas, April 23, 1964, Publ. by the University of Kansas.

  • Copleston, F. (S.J.): 1950, A History of Philosophy, Vol. 2, Ch. 15, Burnes Oates and Washbourne, London (now in Search Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C.: 1973, Analytical Philosophy of Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1966, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1966, pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombocz, W. L.: 1974, Ueber E!. Zur Semantik des Existenzpraedikates..., VWGO, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombocz, W. L.: 1975, ‘Zur Zwei-Argument-Hypothese bezueglich Anselms Proslogion’, Analecta Anselmiana 5, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. P.: 1953, ‘St Anselm on the Varieties of “Doing”’, Theoria 19, 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. P.: 1967, The Logic of St. Anselm, Section 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. P.: 1974, Commentary on De Grammatico, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A.: 1963, Action, Emotion and Will, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGill, A. C.: 1967, ‘Recent Discussion of Anselm's Argument’, in J. H. Hick et al. (eds.), The Many-Faced Argument, Macmillan, New York, 1967, pp. 33–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, N.: 1960, ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, Philosophical Review 69, 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, F. S.: 1936, ‘Ein neues unvollendetes Werk des hl. Anselm von Canterbury’, Beitraege zur Geschichte der Philosopie des Mittelalters, Band 33, Heft 3.

  • Schmitt, F. S.: 1946, S. Anselmi Opera Omnia, Vol. I, Nelson, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern, R. W. and Schmitt, F. S.: 1969, Memorials of St. Anselm, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, J.: 1971a, ‘Id quo nihil maius cogitari potest. Ueber die innere Moeglichkeit eines rationalen Gottesbegriffes’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 53, 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, J.: 1971b, Le Dieu d'Anselme et les Apparences de la Raison, Aubier Montaigne, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.: 1976, ‘Logical Form and Agency’, Philosophical Studies 29, 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rudolf Haller zum 17. April 1979 gewidmet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dazeley, H.L., Gombocz, W.L. Interpreting Anselm as logician. Synthese 40, 71–96 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413946

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413946

Navigation