Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a descriptive study (N = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Budzynska, K., and M. Koszowy. 2014. Introduction: Argument studies in Poland. Argumentation 28 (3): 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budzynska, K., and M. Witek. 2014. Non-inferential aspects of ad hominem and ad baculum. Argumentation 28 (3): 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budzynska, K., et al. 2014. The polish school of argumentation: A manifesto. Argumentation 28 (3): 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budzynska, K., M. Janier, C. Reed, and P. Saint-Dizier. 2016. Theoretical foundations for illocutionary structure parsing. Argument and Computation 7 (1): 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M., and K. Bradley. 2009. Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology 114: 924–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J. 1990. Poland’s journalists: Professionalism and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Czesny, T. 2010. Szermierka słowna. Argumentacja w debatach politycznych (Verbal duels. Argumentation in political debates). Język Polski 3: 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debowska-Kozlowska, K. 2014. Processing topics from the beneficial cognitive model in partially and over-successful persuasion dialogues. Argumentation 28 (3): 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, Y., and D. Hample. 2019. A cross-cultural study of argument orientations of Turkish and American college students: Is silence really golden and speech silver for Turkish students? Argumentation 33: 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09483-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, E., and J.V. Heuvel. 1990. Emerging voices: East European media in transition. New York: Gannett Center for Media Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. 2011. Critical thinking reflection and perspective part I. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (1): 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. 2011. Critical thinking reflection and perspective part II. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2): 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. 2010. The letter versus the spirit: Barriers to meaningful implementation of gender equality policy in Poland. Women’s Studies International Forum 33: 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M.A. 2014. Arguing with people. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, P.D., and J.W. Wenzel. 1979. Proverbs and practical reasoning: A study in socio-logic. Quarterly Journal of Speech 65 (3): 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D. 1999. The life space of personalized conflicts. Communication Yearbook 22: 171–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D. 2005. Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D. 2018. Interpersonal arguing. New York: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D. 2020. Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness are two things apiece. In Networking argument, ed. C. Winker, 453–458. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D., and I.A. Cionea. 2010. Taking conflict personally and its connections with aggressiveness. In Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research, ed. T.A. Avtgis and A.S. Rancer, 372–387. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D., and J.M. Dallinger. 1995. A Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the instrument. Communication Quarterly 43: 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379509369978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D., and A. Irions. 2015. Arguing to display identity. Argumentation 29: 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9351-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D., F. Leal, and J. Suro. 2021. Arguing in Mexico: How uniquely Mexican is it? Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. Online First: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1910066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hample, D., and D. Njweipi-Kongor. 2020. How do people feel about arguing in Cameroon? OSSA Conference Archive. 12. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Friday/12

  • Hinds, J. 1987. Reader vs. writer responsibility: A new typology. In Landmarks Essays on ESL Writing, ed. T. Silva and P.K. Matsuda, 63–73. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, M., and A. Budzyńska-Daca. 2019. A Comparative study of political communication in televised pre-election debates in Poland and the United States of America. Research in Language 17 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., G.J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede Insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com. Accessed 10 September 2021.

  • Hołówka, T. 1998. Błędy, spory, argumenty (Fallacies, disputes, arguments). Warszawa: Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruby, S. 1982. The church in Poland and its political influence. Journal of International Affairs 36 (2): 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infante, D.A., and A.S. Rancer. 1982. A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment 46: 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infante, D.A., and C.J. Wigley. 1986. Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs 53: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowicz, K. 1994. Equality for the downtrodden, freedom for the free: Changing perspectives on social communication in central and eastern Europe. Media, Culture and Society 16 (2): 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochemczyk, Ł, and A. Nowak. 2010. Constructing a network of shared agreement: A model of communication processes in negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation 19 (6): 591–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzak, M., and O. Yaskorska. 2014. Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies. Argumentation 28 (3): 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaś, D., J. Cieciuch, O. Negru, and E. Crocetti. 2015. Relationships between identity and well-being in Italian, Polish, and Romanian emerging adults. Social Indicators Research 121: 727–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpowicz, E., and W. Wesołowski. 2002. Committees of the polish sejm in two political systems. In Committees in post-communist democratic parliaments: Comparative institutionalization, ed. D.M. Olson and W.E. Crowther, 44–68. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khomenko, I., and D. Hample. 2019. Comparative analysis of arguing in Ukraine and the USA. In Proceedings of the ninth conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. B. Garssen, D. Godden, G.R. Mitchell, and J.H.M. Wagemans, 628–639. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., S. Chung, and D. Hample. 2020. How do culture, individual traits, and context influence Koreans’ interpersonal arguing? Argumentation 34: 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09482-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecky, P. 2005. Parliaments in central and eastern Europe: Changing legislative institutions. Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review 41 (3): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koszowy, M., and M. Araszkiewicz. 2014. The Lvov-Warsaw school as a source of inspiration for argumentation theory. Argumentation 28 (3): 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2019. Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum ad verecundiam. Pragmatics and Society 10 (2): 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koszowy, M., K. Budzynska, M. Pereira-Fariña, and R. Duthie. 2022. From theory of rhetoric to the practice of language use: The case of appeals to ethos elements. Argumentation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-021-09564-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotras, M. 2018. Narracje i strategie argumentacyjne w dyskursie IV RP jako narzędzia wyznaczania granic wspólnot w polskim społeczeństwie (Narratives and argumentation strategies in the discourse of the 4th republic as an instrument for demarking borders in Polish society). Kultura i Społeczeństwo 1: 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzio, A. 2013. Frames of self-presentation in constructing persuasive messages: A study of Polish and American political discourse. Rocznik Kognitywistyczny 6: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, I.M. 2015. Power relations and identity construction in didactic discourse: A Polish-English comparative study. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 62 (4): 557–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewiński, M. 2017. Argumentation theory without presumptions. Argumentation 31: 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molek-Kozakowska, K. 2010. Rhetorical styles in internet-mediated political discourse concerning polish gender parity debate 2009/2010. Stylistyka XIX: 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molek-Kozakowska, K., and M. Wanke. 2019. Reproductive rights or duties? The rhetoric of division in social media debates on abortion law in Poland. Social Movement Studies 18 (5): 566–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogiermann, E. 2009. On apologising in negative and positive politeness cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogiermann, Eva. 2009b. Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2): 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogiermann, E. 2012. About polish politeness. In Speech acts and politeness across languages and cultures, ed. L. Ruiz De Zarobe and Y. Ruiz De Zarobe, 27–52. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, D.J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association 13: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszanska, J., R. Olszanski, and J. Wozniak. 1993. Do peaceful conflict management methods pose problems in posttotalitarian Poland? Mediation Quarterly 10 (3): 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornatowski, C. 2010. Parliamentary discourse and political transition: Polish parliament after 1989. In European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction, ed. C. Ilie, 223–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ornatowski, C. 2014. Learning to differ: Transforming parliament through argument and debate in Poland post-1989. In Let’s talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric, ed. H. Van Belle, K. Rutten, P. Gillaerts, D. Van De Mieroop, and B. Van Gorp, 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. 1989. Critical thinking in North America: A new theory of knowledge, learning, and literacy. Argumentation 3: 197–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B., and K. Voltmer. 2012. Negotiating control: Political communication cultures in Bulgaria and Poland. The International Journal of Press/politics 17 (4): 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przewłocka, J. 2015. Bezpieczeństwo uczniów i klimat społeczny w polskich szkołach: raport z badania (Student safety and social climate in Polish schools: Study report). Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancer, A.S., and T.A. Avtgis. 2014. Argumentative and aggressive communication, 2d ed. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozkrut, D., ed. 2021. Mały Rocznik Statystyczny Polski (Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland). Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C.D. 1989. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (6): 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, K., and T. Zaleskiewicz. 2020. Social class and interpersonal trust: Partner’s warmth, external threats and interpretations of trust betrayal. European Journal of Social Psychology 50 (3): 634–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santibáñez, C., D. Hample, and J. Hample. 2021. How do Chilean seniors think about arguing? Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (2): 202–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20002.san.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasinska-Klas, T. 1994. The transition of mass media in Poland: The road to liberalization. The Electronic Journal of Communication 4 (1). https://cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/004/1/00411.HTML

  • Selinger, M. 2014. Towards formal representation and evaluation of arguments. Argumentation 28 (3): 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. 1988. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, N. 2022. The norms of interpersonal arguing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park MD.

  • Szymanek, K., K.A. Wieczorek, and A. Wójcik. 2003. Sztuka argumentacji. (The art of Argumentation). Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tereszkiewicz, A. 2012. Do poles flame? Aggressiveness on Polish discussion groups and social networking sites. In Estonia and Poland. Creativity and tradition in cultural communications, “Jokes and their relations” no. 1, ed. L. Laineste, D. Brzozowska, and W. Chlopicki, 237–268. Tartu: ELM Scholarly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Institute for Gender Equality. 2020. Gender Equality Index 2020 POLAND. https://doi:https://doi.org/10.2839/254499. Accessed 22 August 2021.

  • Tokarz, M. 2006. Argumentacja, perswazja, manipulacja (Argumentation, persuasion, Manipulation). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tychmanowicz, A., S. Filipiak, and Z. Sprynska. 2021. Extravert individualists or introvert collectivists? Personality traits and individualism and collectivism in students in Poland and Ukraine. Current Psychology 40: 5947–5957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoorn, A. 2014. Trust radius versus trust level: Radius of trust as a distinct trust construct. American Sociological Review 79 (6): 1256–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, A.B., V. Kuperman, and M. Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 45: 1191–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasilewska-Kamińska, E. 2016. Myślenie krytyczne jako cel kształcenia. Na przykładzie systemów edukacyjnych USA i Kanady (Critical thinking as the aim of education: The example of education system in the US and Canada). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wielki Słownik Języka Polskiego (The Great Dictionary of Polish). Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN. https://wsjp.pl. Accessed 20 July 2021.

  • Wierzbicka, A. 1985. Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2–3): 145–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winiewski, M., M. Budziszewska, and M. Świder. 2019. Differentiated content of verbal aggression: Effect of gender on insults in secondary schools in Poland. School Psychology International 40 (5): 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiśniewski, J., and M. Zahorska. 2020. Reforming Education in Poland. In Audacious education purposes how governments transform the goals of education systems, ed. F.M. Reimers, 181–208. Cham: Springer Open.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., N. Donthu, and T. Lenartowicz. 2011. Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 23: 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Żelechowska, D., N. Żyluk, and M. Urbański. 2020. Find out a new method to study abductive reasoning in empirical research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL). https://exp.lobi.nencki.gov.pl/nawl-analysis 20 July 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of English, Department of Pragmatics of English, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland

    Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska

  2. Western Illinois University, Macomb, USA

    Dale Hample

Authors
  1. Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dale Hample
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dębowska-Kozłowska, K., Hample, D. “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing. Argumentation 36, 365–392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation