Abstract
Paying thorough attention to cynical action and integrity could result in a less naive approach to ethics and moral communication. This article discusses the issues of integrity and cynicism on a theoretical and on a more practical level. The first part confronts Habermas’s approach of communicative action with Sloterdijk’s concept of cynical reason. In the second part, the focus will be on the constraints and possibilities of moral communication within a business context. Discussing the corporate integrity approach of Kaptein and Wempe will provide this focus. Their approach can be considered as a valuable contribution to the question of how to deal with (dilemmas of) conflicting interests, open discussion, fairness, and strategic decision-making in the context of stakeholder dialog. However, it is concluded that Kaptein and Wempe seem to overstretch the concept of corporate integrity by their inclination to make it an all-purpose remedy for corporate dilemmas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. (2000) Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge, Polity Press
Calhoun C. (1995) Standing for Something., The Journal of Philosophy 92(5), pp. 235–260
Cox, D., M. La Caze, and M. Levine (2005), Integrity http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/integrity (consulted: 4 September 2006)
de Bakker, E., De Cynische Verkleuring van Legitimiteit en Acceptatie (The Cynical Discoloration of Legitimacy and Acceptance) (Dissertation UvA Amsterdam). (Aksant, Amsterdam, 2001)
Goldfarb J. C. (1991) The Cynical Society. The Culture of Politics and the Politics of Culture in American Life. Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press
Habermas, J. (1981), Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns (The Theory of Communicative Action), Volume 2 (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
Habermas, J. (1985), “Zwischen Heine und Heidegger. Ein Renegat der subjektphilosphie?” in Die Neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Kleine Politische Schriften V (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main), pp. 121–125
Habermas J. (1991) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, Massuchusetts, MIT Press
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (translated by W. Rehg) (MIT Press, Massachusetts)
Kaptein M., Wempe J. (2002) The Balanced Company. A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford, Oxford University Press
McFall L. (1987), Integrity, Ethics 98(1), pp. 5–20
Owen D. (1998), Maturity and Modernity. Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. London, Routledge
Sloterdijk, P. (1983), Kritik der Zynischen Vernunft (Critique of Cynical Reason), Volume 2 (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
Wempe, J. (1998), Market and Morality. Business Ethics and the Dirty and Many Hands Dilemma (dissertation Rotterdam, Eburon)
Acknowledgments
I wish to thank the four anonymous reviewers for their comments on a previous version of this article. These comments challenged me in a positive way to improve my line of argument.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Bakker, E. Integrity and Cynicism: Possibilities and Constraints of Moral Communication. J Agric Environ Ethics 20, 119–136 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9020-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9020-y