Abstract
The theory of electrolytic dissociation proved to be one of the most controversial in the history of chemistry. This paper examines the evidence proffered by Arrhenius, van't Hoff, and Ostwald in favour of the theory and outlines the objections raised by Armstrong, Fitzgerald, and Pickering. The controversy revolved partly around the nature of the emerging new chemistry and has important implications for the study of the nature of science. Some important observations are made in relation to the teaching and learning of chemistry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.: 2000, 'The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students' Views of Nature of Science', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(10), 1057–1095.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science literacy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Armstrong, H.E.: 1896, 'Letters to the Editor', Nature 55(1413), 78.
Armstrong, H.E.: 1927, 'Poor Common salt', Nature 120, 478.
Armstrong, H.E.: 1928, 'The nature of Solutions', Nature 121(3037), 48–51.
Arons, A.: 1983, 'Achieving Wider Scientific Literacy', Daedauls 112(1), 91–122.
Arrhenius, S.: 1887, 'Uber die Dissociation der in Wasser gelosten Stoffe', Zeitschrift fur Physicalische Chemie i, 631–648.
Arrhenius, S.: 1902, Textbook of Electrochemistry (translated by John McCrae), Longmans, London.
Arrhenius, S.: 1904, 'Development of the Theory of Electrolytic Dissociation', in L. Pearce Williams & H.J. Steffens (eds.), 1978, The History of Science in Western Civilization Vol. 3, University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 299–306.
Arrhenius, S.: 1912, 'Electrolytic Dissociation', Journal of the American Chemical Society xxxiv, 353–364.
Bianchini, J.A. & Colburn, A.: 2000, 'Teaching the Nature of Science through Inquiry to Prospective Elementary Teachers: A Tale of Two Researchers', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(2), 177–209.
Board of Studies: 2000, HSC Chemistry Syllabus, NSW Board of Studies, Sydney.
de Berg, K.C.: 1990, 'The Historical Development of the Pressure-volume Law for Gases', The Australian Science Teachers Journal 36(1), 14–20.
de Berg, K.C.: 1997, 'Student Responses to a Pedagogical History of the Pressure-Volume law', in I. Winchester (ed.), 1997, Toward Scientific Literacy-Proceedings of the 4th IHPSST Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 178–187.
De Vries, H.: 1888, Zeitschrift fur Physicalische Chemie 2, 414.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J.: 2000, 'Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms', Science Education 84, 287–312.
Duschl, R.A.: 1988, 'Abandoning the Scientistic Legacy of Science Education', Science Education 72, 51–62.
Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, G.L.: 1996, 'Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography', Science Education 80(2), 181–201.
Ebenezer, J.V. & Gaskell, P.J.: 1995, 'Relational Conceptual Change in Solution Chemistry', Science Education 79(1), 1–17.
Fitzgerald, G.F.: 1896, 'Helmholtz Memorial Lecture', Journal of the Chemical Society LXIX, 885–912.
Gingras, Y.: 2001, 'What Did Mathematics Do to Physics', History of Science xxxix, 383–416.
Gratzer, W.(ed.): 1996, A Bedside Nature, Macmillan, London, p. 123.
Heilbron, J.L.: 2002, 'History in Science Education, with Cautionary Tales about the Agreement of Measurement and Theory', Science and Education 11, 321–331.
Herroun, E.F.: 1896, 'Letters to the Editor', Nature 55(1416), 152.
Heyrovska, R.: 1989, 'A Reappraisal of Arrhenius' Theory of Partial Dissociation of Electrolytes', in J.T. Stock & M.V. Orna (eds.), Electrochemistry, Past and Present, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp. 75–91.
Jahn, ?.: 1891, Wiedemann's Annalen der Physik und Chemie 43, 280.
Kuhn, D.: 1993, 'Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking', Science Education 77, 319–337.
Larmor, J.: 1897, 'The Theory of Osmotic Pressure', Nature 55(1432), 545–546.
Lederman, N.G.: 1999, 'Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: Factors That Facilitate or Impede the Relationship', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(8), 916–929.
Matthews, M.R.: 1997, 'Introductory comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education', Science & Education 6(1–2), 5–14.
McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M.P.: 1998, 'The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction', Science & Education 7(6), 511–532.
Meichtry, Y.J.: 1999, 'The Nature of Science and Scientific Knowledge: Implications for a Preservice Elementary Methods Course', Science & Education 8(3), 273–286.
Morris, J.G.: 1974, A Biologist's Physical Chemistry (2nd edn), Edward Arnold, London, pp. 69–75.
Niaz, M.: 2000, 'The Oil Drop Experiment: A Rational Reconstruction of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Controversy and its Implications for Chemistry Textbooks', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(5), 480–508.
Noyes, A.A. & Falk, K.G.: 1912, 'Properties of Salt Solutions IV', Journal of the American Chemical Society xxxiv, 455–489.
Ostwald, W.: 1884a, Journal fur praktische Chemie 29, 385.
Ostwald, W.: 1884b, Journal fur praktische Chemie 30, 93.
Partington, J.R.: 1964, A History of Chemistry Vol. 4, Macmillan, London, pp. 672–681.
Pearce Williams, L. & Steffens, H.J. (eds.): 1978, The History of Science in Western Civilisation Vol. 3, University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 307–313.
Pickering, S.: 1897, 'Letters to the Editor', Nature 55(1419), 223.
Raoult, F.M.: 1882a, Comptes Rendus 94, 1517.
Raoult, F.M.: 1882b, Comptes Rendus 95, 1881.
Raoult, F.M.: 1884, Annales de Chimique Physique 2(vi), 66.
Tammann, ?.: 1887, Memoires de l'academie des sciences. Peterburg 35(9).
Van't Hoff, J.H. & Reicher,: 1888, Zeitschrift fur Physicalische Chemie 2, 781.
Whetham, W.C.D.: 1896, 'Letters to the Editor', Nature 55(1416), 151–152.
Whetham, W.C.D.: 1897, 'The Theory of Dissociation into Ions', Nature 55(1435), 606–607.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Berg, K.C. The Development of the Theory of Electrolytic Dissociation. Science & Education 12, 397–419 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024438216974
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024438216974