Skip to main content
Log in

A new formulation of the Principle of Indifference

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea of a probabilistic logic of inductive inference based on some form of the principle of indifference has always retained a powerful appeal. However, up to now all modifications of the principle failed. In this paper, a new formulation of such a principle is provided that avoids generating paradoxes and inconsistencies. Because of these results, the thesis that probabilities cannot be logical quantities, determined in an objective way through some form of the principle of indifference, is no longer supportable. Later, the paper investigates some implications of the new principle of indifference. To conclude, a re-examination of the foundations of the so-called objective Bayesian inference is called for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayarri M.J., Berger J. (2004). The interplay of Bayesian and Frequentist analysis. Statistical Science 19(1):58–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. (2004). The case for objective analysis. Bayesian Analysis 1:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Bernardo, J. (1992). On the development of reference priors. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4 (pp. 35–60). Oxford University Press.

  • Bernardo, J. M. (2005). Reference analysis. Handbook of Statistics 35. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Box G.E.P., Tiao G.C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. California, Addison Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunouf, P. (2006). Lois Bayésiennes a Priori dans un Plan Binomial Séquentiel. Unpublished doctoral thesis in mathematics, Université de Rouen.

  • Bunouf P., Lecoutre B. (2006). Bayesian priors in sequential binomial design. Comptes Rendus de L’Académie des Sciences Paris, Série I 343:339–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1962). Logical foundation of probability (2nd ed). Chicago, University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cristofaro R. (2004). On the foundations of likelihood principle. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 126:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D.A.S., Reid N., Wong A., Yi G.Y. (2003). Direct Bayes for interest parameters. In: Bernardo J.M., Bayarri M.J., Berger J.O., Dawid A.P., Heckerman D., Smith A.F.M., West M., (eds). Bayesian Statistics 7. Oxford, University Press, pp. 529–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman T.N.T. (1977). Qualitative probabilities and improper distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39:387–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian Approach (2nd ed.). Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.

  • Jaynes, E. T. (2003). In G. Larry Bretthorst (Ed.), Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge: University Press.

  • Rényi, A. (1966). Calcul des probabilités, avec un appendice sur la théorie de l’information. Paris: Dunod.

  • Welch B., Peers H. (1963). On formulae for confidence points based on integrals of weighted likelihoods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 25:318–329

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo de Cristofaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Cristofaro, R. A new formulation of the Principle of Indifference. Synthese 163, 329–339 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9301-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9301-7

Keywords

Navigation