Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Eco-labeled Products: Trend or Tools for Sustainability Strategies?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper offers a point of view on credibility of eco-labeled products, analyzing the relationships among company’s sustainable strategy, eco-label and no-financial reports. Based on a cross-sector study of 109 companies with the EU-Eco-label licenses in Italy, the paper points out different behaviors among the companies investigated and explains the leadership of Italy in the number of these licenses. However, the paper underlines that the use of sustainability tools is not always matched to the explanation of companies’ sustainable strategies. The study identifies the significant drivers for the management of eco-label within a sustainability strategy, drawing attention to the weight, and the hierarchical level of different decisions about sustainability. This study contributes to strengthening the understanding, promoting a discussion on the use of eco-label and on its value, and describing a desirable behavior that any company should tend in order to nourish the credibility that is an essential aspect for building strong associations with the brand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, B., Gulas, C. S., & Iyer, E. (1995). Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Moreau, F., & Parguel, B. (2011). Building brand equity with environmental communication: An empirical investigation in France. EuroMed Journal of Business, 6(1), 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkner, C. (2011). Green global brands: The new world order. Marketing News, 45(12), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, R. (2007). Green wash confronted: Misleading advertisement regulation in the EU audits member states. Retrieved December, 2013, from http://www.foeeurope.org/corporates/pdf/greenwash_confronted.pdf.

  • Business and Sustainable Development. (2001). Corporate social responsibility monitor. Retrieved November, 2013, from http://www.bsdglobal.com/issues/sr_csrm.asp.

  • Chan, R. Y. (2000). The effectiveness of environmental advertising: The role of claim type and the source country green image. International Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. J. (1994). Good ethics is good for business: Ethical attributions and response to environmental advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(11), 873–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, D., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chiara, A., & Delli Carpini, S. (2009). La competitività responsabile d’impresa: il punto sulla CSR in Italia. In La responsabilità sociale delle imprese asiatiche: una sfida per la competitività delle imprese del nostro paese. Napoli: Il Torcoliere, Officine Grafico-editoriale di Ateneo-Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”.

  • Eisingerich, A. B., Rubera, G., Seifert, M., & Bhardwaj, G. (2011). Doing good and doing better despite negative information? The role of Corporate Social Responsibility in consumer resistance to negative information. Journal of Service Research, 14, 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels, 25.10.2011 COM(2011) 681 final.

  • European Commission. (2013). Facts and figures. Retrieved November, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/facts-and-figures.html.

  • Gen Global Ecolabelling Network. (2011). 2011 Annual report. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://www.flipsnack.com/FB8F9BF569B/f7hfgl5j.

  • Grbac, B., & Loncaric, D. (2009). Ethics, social responsibility and business performance in a transition economy. EuroMed Journal of Business, 4(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21(1), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISPRA. (2014). Grafici e dati. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/certificazioni/ecolabel-ue.

  • Johnson, H. J. (2003). Does it pay to be good? Social responsibility and financial performance. Business Horizons, 6, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, T. (2003). Corporate responsibility: A brand extension. Journal of Brand Management, 10(4–5), 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004).‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. In Paper presented at XXth Egos Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

  • Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermiller, C. (1995). The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeal. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 1–14. http://www.expert2business.com.

  • Schuhwerk, M., & Lefkoff-Hagius, R. (1995). Green or non green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigliocco, M., & Siano, A. (2013). The “Greening” of brand: Spin doctoring operation or real environmental responsibility undertaking of companies? In Corporate and marketing communication “Responsible Communication”. Proceedings of the 18th international conference (pp. 1–10). Salerno: University of Salerno.

  • Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2005). The use of corporate social responsibility arguments in communication campaigns: Does source credibility matter? Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 590–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez, P., & Mehrabian, A. (1994). Effects of color on emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4), 394–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, B. (2008). An ethical framework for the marketing of corporate social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicari, S. (1995). Brand Equity. Il potenziale generativo della fiducia. Milano: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as a global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48, 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WPP. (2011). Green brands, global insights 2011. Cohn and Wolfe, Landor Associates. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://www.cohnwolfe.com.

  • http://www.aenor.es.

  • http://www.greenwashing.net.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Naples “L’Orientale”, Italy, Largo San Giovanni Maggiore, 30, 80100, Naples, Italy

    Alessandra De Chiara

Authors
  1. Alessandra De Chiara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra De Chiara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Chiara, A. Eco-labeled Products: Trend or Tools for Sustainability Strategies?. J Bus Ethics 137, 161–172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2510-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2510-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation