Abstract
To Aristotle, spoken words are symbols, not of objects in the world, but of our mental experiences related to these objects. Presently there are two major strands of interpretation of Aristotle’s concept of the linguistic sign. First, there is the structuralist account offered by Coseriu (Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Von den Anfängen bis Rousseau, 2003 [1969], pp. 65–108) whose interpretation is reminiscent of the Saussurean sign concept. A second interpretation, offered by Lieb (in: Geckeler (Ed.) Logos Semantikos: Studia Linguistica in Honorem Eugenio Coseriu 1921–1981, 1981) and Weidemann (in: Schmitter (Ed.) Geschichte der Sprachtheorie 2. Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike, 1991), says that Aristotle’s concept of the linguistic sign is similar to the one presented in Ogden and Richard’s (The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism, 1970 [1923]) semiotic triangle. This paper starts off with an introductory outline of the so-called phýsei-thései discussion which started during presocratic times and culminated in Plato’s Cratylus. Aristotle’s concept of the linguistic sign is to be regarded as a solution to the stalemate position reached in the Cratylus. Next, a discussion is offered of both Coseriu’s and Lieb’s analysis. We submit that Aristotle’s concept of the linguistic sign shows features of both Saussure’s and Ogden and Richards’s sign concept but that it does not exclusively predict one of the two. We argue that Aristotle’s concept of the linguistic sign is based on three different relations which together evince his teleological as well empiricist point of view: one internal (symbolic) relation and two external relations, i.e. a likeness relation and a relation katà synthéken.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackrill J. (1963). Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with Notes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Arens H. (1984). Aristotle’s theory of language and its tradition. Texts from 500 to 1750. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, John Benjamins
Arens H. (2000). Sprache und Denken bei Aristoteles. In: Auroux, S. et al. (eds) History of the Language Sciences/Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften/Histoire des sciences du langage Vol. 1., pp 367–375. W. de Gruyter, Berlin/New York
Armstrong D.F. et al. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ax W. (1992). Aristoteles. In: Dascal, M. et al. (eds) Sprachphilosophie/Philosophy of language/La philosophie du langage Vol. 1, pp 244–259. W. de Gruyter, Berlin/New York
Barnes, J. (Ed.) (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Borsche T. (1991). Platon. In: Schmitter, P. (eds) Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike, pp 140–169. Tübingen, Niemeyer
Charles D. (1994). Aristotle on names and their signification. In: Everson, S. (eds) Language., pp 37–73. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Corballis M.C. (2002). From hand to mouth: the origins of language. University Press Princeton, Princeton
Coseriu, E. (2003 [1969]). Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Von den Anfängen bis Rousseau. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.
Coseriu, E. (2004 [1968]). L’arbitraire du signe. Zur Spätgeschichte eines aristotelischen Begriffes. In E. Coseriu, Der Physei-Thesei-Streit. Sechs Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie (pp. 1–35). Tübingen: Narr.
Coseriu, E. (2004 [1979]). (τò ἕν σημαίνειν. Bedeutung und Bezeichnung bei Aristoteles. In E. Coseriu, Der Physei-Thesei-Streit. Sechs Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie (pp. 63–71). Tübingen: Narr.
Coseriu E. (2004). Der Physei-Thesei-Streit. Sechs Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Tübingen, Narr
De Rijk L.M. (2002). Aristotle: semantics and ontology. 1: General introduction; The works on logic. Leiden, Brill
Di Cesare D. (1991). Die Geschmeidugkeit der Sprache. Zur Sprachauffassung und Sprachbetrachtung der Sophistik. In: Schmitter, P. (eds) Geschichte der Sprachtheorie 2. Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike., pp 87–118. Tübingen, Narr
Fowler H.N.P. (41963). Cratylus. Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press
Hoffmann E. (1925). Die Sprache und die archaische Logik. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen
Joseph J.E. (2000). Limiting the arbitrary. Linguistic naturalism and its opposites in Plato’s Cratylus and modern theories of language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
Lieb H.-H. (1981). Das ‘semiotische Dreieck’ bei Ogden und Richards: eine Neuformulierung des Zeichenmodells von Aristoteles. In H. Geckeler (Ed.), Logos Semantikos: Studia Linguistica in Honorem Eugenio Coseriu 1921–1981 (Vol. I, pp. 137–156). Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter & Madrid: Gredos.
Lo Piparo, F. (1988). Aristotle: The material conditions of linguistic expressiveness. Versus: Quaderni di studi semiotici, 50–51, pp. 83–102.
Lyons J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Modrak D.K. (2001). Aristotle’s theory of language and meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ogden C.K., Richards I.A. (1970 [1923]). The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Rijlaarsdam J.C. (1978). Platon über die Sprache. Ein Kommentar zum Kratylus. Utrecht, Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema
Rizzolatti G. and Arbib M.A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21: 188–194
Schmitter P. (2001). The emergence of philosophical semantics in early Greek antiquity. Logos and language. Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory, II: 2: 45–56
Sheehan T. (1988). Hermeneia and Apophansis. The early Heidegger on Aristotle. In: Volpi, F. et al. (eds) Heidegger et l’idée de la phénoménologie, pp 67–80. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Sluiter, I. (2000). Language and thought in Stoic philosophy. In S. Auroux et al. (Eds.), History of the language sciences/Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften/Histoire des sciences du langage (Vol. 1, pp. 375–384). Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter.
Stokoe W.C. (2001). Sign language versus spoken language. Sign Language Studies 1(4): 407–425
Weidemann H. (1991). Grundzüge der Aristotelischen Sprachtheorie. In: Schmitter, P. (eds) Geschichte der Sprachtheorie 2. Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike, pp 170–192. Tübingen, Narr
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Cuypere, L., Willems, K. Meaning and Reference in Aristotle’s Concept of the Linguistic Sign. Found Sci 13, 307–324 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9134-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9134-y