Skip to main content
Log in

Break philosophy through internally

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contrasts and illustrates two types of breakthroughs in philosophy; i.e., external and internal ones. Both are made possible through its application to a newfield. In the external breakthrough, a new field is discovered by such factors without philosophy as encounters with different traditions of thought and advance in technology. In the internal one, a new field is brought into attention by critical examination of one or another assumption within philosophy that has once dismissed the field as too trivial or insignificant to be its proper subject. Based on this distinction, a research guideline for philosophy is proposed that one must always seek the possibility of its internal breakthrough. It is also suggested that the philosophy of science and epistemology can be innovated internally when they are applied to a new field, that is, statistics. Finally the distinction between pure and applied philosophy is reinterpreted in the light of the internal breakthrough.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bynum T, Moor H (eds) (2000) The digital phoenix: how computers are changing philosophy, revised edition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R, Han H, Neurath O, (1973) Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis. In: Neurath M, Cohen RS (eds) Otto Neurath: empiricism and sociology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 301–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D (1972) Reduction in genetics—biology or philosophy? Philosophy of Science 39:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P, (1984) Species. Philosophy of Science 51:308–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1959) Where Are We? Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst N (1961) The structure of science. Harcourt Brace and World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith WH (1981) The rationality of science. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner K (1967) Approaches to reductionism. Philosophy of Science 34:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuo Deguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deguchi, Y. Break philosophy through internally. Topoi 25, 33–38 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0004-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0004-3

Keywords

Navigation