Elsevier

Cognition

Volume 73, Issue 3, 17 December 1999, Pages B37-B53
Cognition

Biological preparedness and evolutionary explanation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00062-1Get rights and content

Abstract

It is commonly supposed that evolutionary explanations of cognitive phenomena involve the assumption that the capacities to be explained are both innate and modular. This is understandable: independent selection of a trait requires that it be both heritable and largely decoupled from other ‘nearby’ traits. Cognitive capacities realized as innate modules would certainly satisfy these contraints. A viable evolutionary cognitive psychology, however, requires neither extreme nativism nor modularity, though it is consistent with both. In this paper, we seek to show that rather weak assumptions about innateness and modularity are consistent with evolutionary explanations of cognitive capacities. Evolutionary pressures can affect the degree to which the development of a capacity is canalized by biasing acquisition/learning in ways that favor development of concepts and capacities that proved adaptive to an organism's ancestors.

Introduction

Evolutionary explanations of cognitive phenomena are often thought to imply that the cognitive capacities targeted for evolutionary explanation are innate and modular. We argue that neither of these implications is necessitated by evolutionary explanations of particular cognitive effects. Instead, we argue that issues of innateness should be conceived in terms of canalization, i.e the degree to which the development of a trait is robust across normal environmental variations (Waddington, 1975, McKenzie and O'Farrell, 1993, Ariew, 1996). Evolutionary pressures can affect the degree to which the development of a trait is canalized. High canalization can be the consequence of biasing learning/acquisition processes in ways that favor the development of concepts and cognitive functions that proved adaptive to an organism's ancestors. The end result of these biases is an adult organism that exhibits a number of highly specialized cognitive abilities that have many of the characteristics associated with modules: functional specialization, reliable emergence in spite of considerable environmental variability, and some degree of informational encapsulation.

This perspective makes it evident that criticisms of innate cognitive modules are not ipso facto criticisms of evolutionary explanations of cognitive capacities. Since evidence for modularity in the developed organism is compatible with a high degree of neural placticity in the early stages of development, it is possible to have an evolutionary explanation of cognitive modules that does not assume these modules to be innate in the sense in which this means unlearned or present at birth or coded in the genes. Of course, an evolutionary approach to cognition is compatible with modules that are innate in this sense. Our point is simply that it need not presuppose them.

We begin by discussing two factors that appear to be prominent in motivating interest in evolutionary approaches to cognition. We then characterize how evolutionary explanations of cognitive phenomena that appeal to innate modules are typically interpreted. We then review some of the criticisms that have been levelled against this approach. Finally, we expound and defend a conception of the relation between natural selection and cognitive development that is responsive to worries about innate modules yet compatible with an evolutionary explanation of specialized and relatively independent cognitive mechanisms in adult organisms.

Section snippets

The motivation for an evolutionary approach to cognition

Two factors appear to be prominent in motivating researchers to adopt an evolutionary approach to cognition. The first is simply that cognitive psychologists are in the business of explaining cognition in biological organisms, and biological organisms are the product of evolutionary forces. To put it more succinctly:

  • If you are a materialist, then you are committed (at least implicitly) to the view that The mind is what the brain does.

That is, our cognitive and emotional functions are

Characterization of the innate modules view

According to some researchers, the early emergence and domain-specificity of many cognitive capacities is evidence that evolution has produced a mind best characterized as a collection of innate and independent modules, each of which arose in response to environmental pressures during a species’ evolution.

  • Our cognitive architecture resembles a confederation of hundreds or thousands of functionally dedicated computers (often called modules) designed to solve adaptive problems endemic to our

Objections to innate modules

The objections to the innate modules view divide into two classes. The first and most fundamental consists of arguments from neural plasticity. The second consists of arguments defending the sufficiency of a few general-purpose learning mechanisms to account for the type of phenomena typically urged on innate modules. We briefly review these two lines of argument in turn.

Objections to general-purpose learning

The widely recognized difficulty with a general-purpose learning approach is that it does not explain the ‘biases’ that are plainly evident in the newborn brain. Although it is possible, for example, to force auditory cortex to acquire the capacity for visual processing, the result is not normal vision (Roe, Pallas, Kwon, & Sur, 1992). Similarly, it is highly unlikely that the hippocampus is suited to do either visual or auditory processing. Thus, there are neurological biases present at birth,

A third interpretation: evolution affects degree to which cognitive traits are canalized

As diametrically opposed as these positions seem to be, there in fact exists a common ground which they occupy and upon which a coherent evolutionary psychology can be founded. The following quotations exhibit this common ground.

There can be no question about the major role played by our biological inheritance in determining our physical form and our behaviors. We are not empiricists. What troubles us about the term innate is that, as it is often used in cognitive and developmental sciences, it

How preparedness and environmental input can constrain higher cognition

As an example of how genetically encoded biases and environmental input can combine to channel the development of higher cognitive functions, consider the development of social reasoning. Newborns (no more than a few minutes old) show a distinct bias for looking at faces as compared to other equally complex stimuli (Goren, Sarty & Wu, 1975). Ten-week-old infants have been found to distinguish among emotional facial expressions (Entremont & Muir, 1997). Within the first year of life, they also

Closing comments

By invoking the concepts of biological preparedness and canalization, one can readily explain how a highly plastic developing brain could end up like a Swiss Army knife. Highly specialized functions need not be present at birth. Instead, the majority of comparative, developmental, and neuroscientific evidence weighs in on the side of fast-track learning through biological ‘biases’ or predispositions that entrain the focus of our attention on the environmental stimuli and contingencies that

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this manuscript. Portions of this paper were presented by the first author at the 10th Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, University of California-Davis, June, 1998.

References (86)

  • R. Baillargeon

    Object permanence in 3 1/2- and 4 1/2-month-old infants

    Developmental Psychology

    (1987)
  • R. Baillargeon

    How do infants learn about the physical world?

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (1994)
  • M.T. Banich

    Neuropsychology: the neural bases of mental function

    (1997)
  • S. Baron-Cohen

    Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind

    (1995)
  • K. Bartsch et al.

    Young children's attribution of action to beliefs and desires

    Child Development

    (1989)
  • I.L. Bernstein et al.

    Learned food aversion: a component of anorexia syndromes

    Psychological Review

    (1986)
  • B.I. Bertenthal

    The development of sensitivity to biomechanical motions

    Child Development

    (1985)
  • C. Blakemore

    Developmental factors in the formation of feature extracting neurons

  • C. Blakemore et al.

    Development of the brain depends on visual environment

    Nature

    (1970)
  • M.D.S. Braine et al.

    A theory of if: a lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles

    Psychological Review

    (1991)
  • P. Broca

    Paul Broca on the speech centers

  • J.J. Campos et al.

    Perception, appraisal, and emotion: the onset of social referencing

  • S. Carey et al.

    Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change

  • L.M. Cook et al.

    Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus monkeys

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1989)
  • L.M. Cook et al.

    Selective associations in the observational conditioning of fear in rhesus monkeys

    Journal of Experimental Psvchology: Animal Behavior Processes

    (1990)
  • L. Cosmides et al.

    Cognitive adaptations for social exchange

  • L. Cosmides et al.

    Origins of domain specificity: the evolution of functional organization

  • D.D. Cummins

    Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-olds

    Memory and Cognition

    (1996)
  • D.D. Cummins

    Evidence for the innateness of deontic reasoning

    Mind and Language

    (1996)
  • D.D. Cummins

    Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of human reasoning

    Minds and Machines

    (1996)
  • D.D. Cummins

    Human reasoning from an evolutionary perspective

    Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society

    (1996)
  • D.D. Cummins

    Rationality: biological, psychology, and normative theories

    Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive (Current Psychology of Cognition)

    (1997)
  • D.D. Cummins

    Social norms and other minds: the evolutionary roots of higher cognition

  • D.D. Cummins

    Can humans form hierarchically embedded mental representations?

    Commentary on R.W. Byrne and A.E. Russon Learning By Imitation: a Hierarchical Approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1998)
  • D.D. Cummins

    Biological preparedness and evolutionary explanation

    Paper presented at the meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, University of California-Davis, July

    (1998)
  • D.D. Cummins

    How the social environment shaped the evolution of mind

    Synthese

    (1999)
  • D.D. Cummins
  • Cummins, D.D. (1999) Cheater detection is modified by social rank. Evolution and Human...
  • D.D. Cummins

    Adaptive cognitive mechanisms: reasoning about social norms cummins/evolutionary explanation and other minds

  • S. Curtiss

    Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern day wild child

    (1977)
  • A.R. Damasio

    Descartes error: emotion, reason, and the human brain

    (1994)
  • F.B. de Waal et al.

    Modification of reconciliation behavior through social experience: an experiment with two macaque species

    Child Development

    (1993)
  • P.D. Eimas

    Speech perception in early infancy

  • Cited by (54)

    • Early-emerging and highly heritable sensitivity to human communication in dogs

      2021, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, there is a critical need for research that can directly assess genetic contributions to these aspects of dog social cognition and inform their potential for evolutionary selection. We hypothesized that if dogs’ social skills for cooperating with humans are biologically prepared,15 they should emerge robustly in early development, not require extensive socialization or learning, and exhibit heritable variation. To evaluate these predictions, we tested 375 retriever puppies from a pedigreed population (mean age = 8.5 weeks) on a cognitive and behavioral test battery.

    • Deontic and epistemic reasoning in children revisited: Comment on Dack and Astington

      2013, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cummins (2000, 2004) argued that specific forms of social reasoning fall into this category, namely, the acquisition of social rules (norms) that constrain behavior in one’s social group and detecting violations of such norms. Cummins and Cummins (1999, 2003, (see also Cummins, Cummins & Poirer, 2003) analyzed early emergence in terms of learning bias and canalization. Learning bias refers to attentional biases (e.g., the infant’s preference to look at faces as opposed to equally complex stimuli).

    • Prenatal ethanol exposure leads to greater ethanol-induced appetitive reinforcement

      2012, Alcohol
      Citation Excerpt :

      One could speculate why differences between these conditions emerged when ethanol-induced aversion was measured using second-order CPP and not when measured using CTA. Memories acquired through taste conditioning paradigms are known for their strength and biological preparation (Dellarosa Cummins & Cummins, 1998), and perhaps they are less susceptible to the effects of early life experiences than memories acquired through higher-order conditioning paradigms or pairings of ethanol with exteroceptive stimuli rather than flavors. Previous studies also showed that prenatal (Abate, Spear, & Molina, 2001) or postnatal (Pautassi, Ponce, & Molina, 2005) exposure to ethanol did not disrupt the expression of postnatal conditioned aversion to chemosensory stimuli paired with ethanol.

    • Early maternal separation affects ethanol-induced conditioning in a nor-BNI insensitive manner, but does not alter ethanol-induced locomotor activity

      2012, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      To our knowledge, there is only one study that assessed sensitivity to the aversive properties of psychoactive drugs after MS. Roma et al. (2008) found reliable but similar amphetamine-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in maternally-isolated and control animals. Taste aversion memories, however, are known for their potency and biological preparedness (Dellarosa Cummins and Cummins, 1999). Therefore, they are perhaps less likely to be affected by early maternal isolation than conditioned place preference, perhaps especially when induced by a higher-order conditioning preparation such as SOC.

    • Collaborating on evolving the future

      2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text