Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Non-Discrimination in Human Resources Management as a Moral Obligation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I will argue that it is a moral obligation for companies, firstly, to accept their moral responsibility with respect to non-discrimination, and secondly, to address the issue with a full-fledged programme, including but not limited to the countering of microsocial discrimination processes through specific policies. On the basis of a broad sketch of how some discrimination mechanisms are actually influencing decisions, that is, causing intended as well as unintended bias in Human Resources Management (HRM), I will argue that the well known tools of legislation and ethical codes are necessary although insufficient to cope with the problem. However, based on empirical evidence, we know which set of measures is likely to diminish discrimination. Taking non-discrimination seriously implies complex and longitudinal policies which include assigning responsibility for a non-discrimination policy within the firm, making managers conscious of implicit stereotypes and helping them to cope with prejudices that no one can totally overcome. Insofar as corporate responsibility with respect to non-discrimination is accepted and strategies that are not prohibitively expensive are known, companies are bound to implement them. Not implementing the best set of measures may be considered at least as a moral shortcoming or, depending on the size of the company, mere lip service to the non-discrimination principle. Although the paper refers to empirical material of diverse backgrounds, its intent is clearly normative. It wishes to spell out what companies ought to do if they are committed to responsible behaviour. The discussion of effective remedies against discrimination is based on a case study of a French company. The retailer Auchan was recently surprised to learn that it was discriminating against ethnic minorities despite strong ethical standards, an ethics committee and ethical leadership. The company dropped its naïve beliefs and set up an ambitious policy cope with the issue. The case illustrates what recent empirical research has revealed about the effectiveness of diversity policies: establishing responsibility for diversity results, firm ethical commitment and support from top management make diversity programs effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alder, G. Stoney and Joseph Gilbert: 2006, ‘Achieving Ethics and Fairness in Hiring: Going Beyond the Law.’ Journal of Business Ethics 68, 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amadieu, J.-F.: 2005, Employment Discrimination. The Situation Today and Future Research Required. Unpublished Paper, Presented at Columbia University (May 2005), downloadable on www.observatoiredesinegalites.fr.

  • Arkes Hal R. and Philip E. Tetlock: 2004, ‘Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘Fail’ the Implicit Association Test?’ Psychological Inquiry 15 (4), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, Richard: 1989, ‘Equality of Opportunity for Welfare.’ Philosophical Studies 56: 77-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth: 1973, ‘The Theory of Discrimination’ in Orley Ashenfelter & Albert Rees (eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton), pp. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, Derek R., Patrick F. McKay and David C. Wilson: 2008, ‘What Are the Odds? How Demographic Similarity Affects the Prevalence of Perceived Employment Discrimination’ Journal of Applied Psychology. 93 (2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Andrew Scott and Mahzarin R. Banaji: 2006, ‘The Development of Implicit Attitudes. Evidence of Race Evaluations From Ages 6 and 10 and Adulthood.’ Psychological Science 17, 53-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.: 1979 [1957], The economics of discrimination, 2nd Edition (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago)

  • Bell, M.: 2003, ‘The Right to Equality and Non-discrimination’, in T. Hervey and J. Kenner (eds.), Economic and Social Rights Under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A Legal Perspective (Hart Publishing, Oxford)

  • Bell, Mark: 2004 ‘Equality and the EuropeanUnion Constitution.’ Industrial Law Journal 33, 242-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.: 2004, ‘Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination.’ American Economic Review 94, 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R., M. Dabady and C. F. Citro: 2004, Measuring Racial Discrimination (National Academies Press, Washington DC)

  • Blivet, Laurent : 2004, Ni quotas, ni indifférence. L’entreprise et l’égalité positive. (Institut Montaigne, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo Lawrence D. and Cybelle Fox: 2003 ‘Race, Racism, and Discrimination: Bridging Problems, Methods, and Theory in Social Psychological Research’ Social Psychology Quarterly 66, 319-332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cédiey, Eric & Fabrice Foroni: 2005, Un diagnostic partagé sur les discriminations liées à l’origine et au sexe. Résultat d’une recherche au sein du Groupe Casino. (ISM-CORUM, Lyon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuijnck, Geert and Christine Le Clainche: 2007, ‘What we owe to persons with a disability: a theoretical puzzle versus stable widely shared intuitions.’ Imprints. Egalitarian Theory and Practice 10: 37-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald: 1977, Taking Rights Seriously. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald: 2000, Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foroni, Fabrice (ed.): 2008, Résultats du testing sollicité par le Groupe Casino. Un diagnostic partagé sur les discriminations liées à l’origine. (ISM-CORUM, Lyon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes-Garcia, Fernando, Julia Nunez-Tabales & Ricardo Veroz-Herradon: 2008, ‘Applicability of Corporate Social Responsibility to Human Resources Management: Perspective from Spain.’ Journal of Business Ethics 82, 27-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavand, Alain : 2006. Prévenir la discrimination à l’embauche. Pourquoi et comment agir ? (Editions d’Organisation, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobin, B. and G. d’Herblin: 2006, Le Secret des Mulliez – Révélations Sur le Premier Empire Familial Français (Editions la Borne Seize. s.l.)

  • Hausman, Daniel: 1992, The inexact and separate science of economics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer Harry J.: 1997, ‘Why Do Small Establishments Hire Fewer Blacks Than Large Ones?’. The Journal of Human Resources 32 (4), 896-914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1738 [1966], A treatise of human nature (Clarendon Press, Oxford)

  • James, Erika Hayes and Lynn Perry Wooten: 2006, ‘Diversity Crises: How Firms Manage Discrimination Lawsuits.’ Academy of Management Journal 49 (6), 1103–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, John T., Mahzarin Banaji, and Brian A. Nosek: 2004, ‘A Decade of System-Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.’ Political Psychology 25, 881–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, Alexandra, Frank Dobbin and Erin Kelly: 2006, ‘Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.’ American Sociological Review 71, 589-617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and M. Schwartz: 2007, ‘The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model’. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2007-0306ORG. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=988844.

  • Kaptein, Muel and Johannes Wempe: 1998, ‘Twelve Gordian Knots When Developing an Organizational Code of Ethics’. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8), 853-869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lever, Annabelle: 2004, ‘Why Racial Profiling is Hard to Justify: A response to Risse and Zeckhauser.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 33, 94-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libertella, Anthony, Sebastian Sora & Samuel Natale: 2007, ‘Affirmative Action Policy and Changing Views’. Journal of Business Ethics 74, 65-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E.: 1903, Principia Ethica. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, Brian & Jeffery Hansen: 2008, ‘The associations in our head belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation.’ Cognition and Emotion 22, 553-594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek Brian, Frederick L. Smyth, Jeffrey J. Hansen, Thierry Devos, Nicole M. Lindner, Kate A. Ranganath, Colin Tucker Smith, Kristina R. Olson, Dolly Chugh, Anthony G. Greenwald & Mahzarin R. Banaji: 2007, ‘Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes.’ European Review of Social Psychology 18, 36-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, L.-E. and F. Krings: 2009, ‘Are Ethical Codes of Conduct Toothless Tigers for Dealing with Employment Discrimination?’ Journal of Business Ethics 85(4), 501–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless, Nicola M and Thomas Maak: 2004, ‘Building an Inclusive Diversity Culture: Principles, Processes and Practice’. Journal of Business Ethics 54, 129-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Mathias & Richard Zeckhauser : 2004, ‘Racial Profiling.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 32, 131-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, Daniel : 2003, L’égalité par le droit. Les paradoxes de la discrimination positive aux Etats-Unis. (Economica, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabeg, Yazid & Laurence Méhaignerie : 2006, Les oubliés de l’égalité des chances. (Hachette, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, George: 1975, ‘Justifying Reverse Discrimination in Employment.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 4(2): 159-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L.M., B. G. Chung-Herrera, M. A. Dean, J. Holcombe Ehhrhart, D. I. Jung, A. E. Randel and G. Singh: 2008 ‘Diversity in Organizations: Where Are We Now And Where Are We Going’. Human Resource Management Review 19(2): 117-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph: 1974 ‘Theories of Discrimination and Economic Policy’, in von Furstenberg et al. (eds): Patterns of Racial Discrimination. Volume II : Employment and Income. (Lexington, Lexington Books), pp. 5-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. L., M. Hosoda, K. M. Lukaszewski and T. N. Phillips: 2008, ‘Methodological Problems Associated with Research on Unfair Discrimination Against Racial Minorities’, Human Resource Management Review 18, 243-258.

  • Trevino, Linda Klebe and Gary R. Weaver: 1994, ‘Business Ethics/Business Ethics: One Field or Two?’. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2), 113-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Furstenberg, George M., Ann Horowitz and Bennett Harrison (eds.): 1974, Patterns of Racial Discrimination. Volume II: Employment and Income. (Lexington, Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Gary R. and Linda Klebe Trevino: 1994, ‘Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity?’. Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 129-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Patrick : 2005, La république de la diversité : Immigration, intégration, discriminations. (Seuil, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentling, Rose Mary and Nilda Palma-Rivas: 1999 ‘Components of effective diversity training programmes’. International Journal of Training and Development 3(3): 215-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, Patricia 1994. The Normative/Descriptive Distinction in Methodologies of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 175-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, Alan: 1983, ‘Jobs, Qualifications, and Preferences.’ Ethics 94, 99-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard: 1985, Ethics and the limits of philosophy. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, William J.: 1996, When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. (Knopf, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegert, Jonathan C. and Paul J. Hanges: 2005, ‘Employment Discrimination: The Role of Implicit Attitudes, Motivation, and a Climate for Racial Bias’. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (3), 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Edhec Business School, 58, rue du Port, 59000, Lille, France

    Geert Demuijnck

Authors
  1. Geert Demuijnck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geert Demuijnck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demuijnck, G. Non-Discrimination in Human Resources Management as a Moral Obligation. J Bus Ethics 88, 83–101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0100-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0100-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation