References
Allen, Anita. 1991. The black surrogate mother: The socio-economic struggle for equality. 8 Harvard Black Letter Journal 17: 17–31.
Anderson, Elisabeth. 2000. Why commercial surrogate motherhood unethically commodifies women and children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales. Health Care Analysis 8(1): 19–26.
Dickenson, Donna. 2002. Commodification of human tissue: Implications for feminist and development ethics. Developing World Bioethics 2(1): 55–63.
Dupré, John. 1993. The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gannett, Lisa. 1999. What’s in a cause?: The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biology and Philosophy 14: 349–373.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2002. The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Longino, Helen. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, Sandra. 2003. Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moody-Adams, Michele. 1991. On surrogacy. Public Affairs Quarterly 5: 175–190.
Nelkin, Dorothy, and Susan Lindee. 2004. The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Robert, Jason S. 2004. Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, Steven. 2003. Lifelines: Life beyond the gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Melo-Martín, I. Through a glass, darkly. Metascience 21, 367–370 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-011-9633-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-011-9633-2