Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T09:23:28.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Xenotransplantation Can Be Safe—A Reply

A response to: L Syd M Johnson, “Existing Ethical Tensions in Xenotransplantation” (CQ31(3))

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2023

Joachim Denner*
Affiliation:
Free University Berlin, Institute of Virology, Robert von Ostertag-Straße 7, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Johnson, LSM. Existing ethical tensions in xenotransplantation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2022;31(3):355–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

2. Griffith, BP, Goerlich, CE, Singh, AK, Rothblatt, M, Lau, CL, Shah, A, et al. Genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation. New England Journal of Medicine 2022;387(1):3544 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

3. Denner, J, Schuurman, HJ, Patience, C. The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--Chapter 5: Strategies to prevent transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses. Xenotransplantation. 2009;16(4):239–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4. Nellore, A, Walker, J, Kahn, MJ, Fishman, JA. Moving xenotransplantation from bench to bedside: Managing infectious risk. Transplantation Infectious Diseases 2022;23:e13909 Google Scholar.

5. Denner, J. Virus safety of xenotransplantation. Viruses 2022;14(9):1926 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.