Skip to main content
Log in

Seed (Sperma) and Kuêma in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two different notions of seed (sperma) at work in the Generation of Animals: seed as the spermatic residue (perittôma), which concerns only the male and the female generative contributions, and seed as the kuêma and first mixture of the two generative contributions. The latter is a notion of seed common to plants and animals. The passage in GA I.18, 724b12–22 where Aristotle distinguishes between these two notions of seed has been mistakenly discredited as inauthentic or simply as irrelevant for understanding the seeds of animals. On the other hand, recent studies have rather focused on the seed as spermatic residue (in particular, the female contribution as seed), paying little attention to the notion of seed as kuêma. In this paper I defend the authenticity and relevance of this passage and show how understanding the notion of seed as kuêma is essential to have a complete picture of Aristotle’s account of seed. This common notion of seed makes sense of Aristotle’s otherwise puzzling use of the word “sperma” to designate the seeds of plants, the kuêma, the fertilized eggs, and the first mixture of the two generative contributions. It also proves helpful in determining what the word ‘sperma’ stands for in key passages, such as Metaph. IX.7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. 1942. The Generation of Animals. Edited and Translated by A.L. Peck. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press

  • Aristotle. 1965. De Generatione Animalium. Edited by J. H. Drossaart Lulofs. Oxford: Oxford University Press

  • Aristotle. 1992. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with Passages from II.13). Translated with Notes by David M. Balme, with a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography by Allan Gotthelf. New York: Oxford

  • Beere, Jonathan 2008. Doing and Being. New York: Oxford University PressBeere, Jonathan. 2008

  • Bolton, Robert. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” Allan Gotthelf and James G Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 120–166. New York: Cambridge University Press

  • Carraro, Nicola. 2017. “Aristotle’s Embryology and Ackrill’s Problem.” Phronesis 62: 274–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, Alan. 1987. “Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology.” Philosophical Topics 15: 51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, Andrew. 1995. “Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the Fifth Century BC and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” Phronesis 40: 48–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Sophia M. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean-Jones, Lesley. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Classical Greek Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, Cynthia A. 1987. “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality.” Allan Gotthelf and James G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 392–407. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Furth, Montgomery. 1988. Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, Jessica. 2010. “Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Biology.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Devin. 2006. “Understanding Aristotle’s Reproductive Hylomorphism.” Apeiron 39: 257–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, David. 2016. “Le Sperma: Forme, Matière ou les Deux? Aristote Critique de la Double Semence.” Philosophie Antique 16: 31–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, Robert. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology: Reason or Rationalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morsink, Johannes. 1982. Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Scott. 2015. “The Subjects of Natural Generation in Aristotle’s Physics I.7.” Apeiron 48: 45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preus, Anthony. 1975. Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Biological Works. New York: G. Olms

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio De Ribera-Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Ribera-Martin, I. Seed (Sperma) and Kuêma in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals. J Hist Biol 52, 87–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9508-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9508-0

Keywords

Navigation