Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T10:37:55.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A rigorous approach for testing the constructionist hypotheses of brain function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2012

Gopikrishna Deshpande ,
K. Sathian ,
Xiaoping Hu  and
Joseph A. Buckhalt
Gopikrishna Deshpande
Affiliation:
Auburn University MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849. gopi@auburn.eduhttp://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/gzd0005/
K. Sathian
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Psychology, Emory University, and Atlanta VAMC Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence, Atlanta, GA 30322. krish.sathian@emory.eduhttp://neurology.emory.edu/Faculty/Sathian.htm
Xiaoping Hu
Affiliation:
Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, and Center for Systems Imaging, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. xhu3@emory.eduhttp://www.bme.emory.edu/~xhu/
Joseph A. Buckhalt
Affiliation:
Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation and Counseling, College of Education, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5222. buckhja@mail.auburn.eduhttp://www.auburn.edu/~buckhja/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the target article provides strong evidence against the locationist view, evidence for the constructionist view is inconclusive, because co-activation of brain regions does not necessarily imply connectivity between them. We propose a rigorous approach wherein connectivity between co-activated regions is first modeled using exploratory Granger causality, and then confirmed using dynamic causal modeling or Bayesian modeling.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 148 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deshpande, G., Hu, X., Stilla, R. & Sathian, K. (2008) Effective connectivity during haptic perception: A study using Granger causality analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. NeuroImage 40(4):1807–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, G., LaConte, S., James, G., Peltier, S. & Hu, X. (2009) Multivariate Granger causality analysis of brain networks. Human Brain Mapping 30(4):1361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, G., Santhanam, P. & Hu, X. (2011) Instantaneous and causal connectivity in resting state brain networks derived from functional MRI data. NeuroImage 54(2):1043–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, G., Sathian, K. & Hu, X. (2010) Assessing and compensating for zero-lag correlation effects in time-lagged Granger causality analysis of fMRI. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57(6):1446–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havlicek, M., Friston, K., Jan, J., Brazdil, M. & Calhoun, V. (2011) Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering. NeuroImage 56(4):2109–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinazzo, D., Pellicoro, M. & Stramaglia, S. (2008) Kernel–Granger causality and the analysis of dynamical networks. Physical Review E 77:056215. (Online publication.) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryali, S., Supekar, K., Chen, T. & Menon, V. (2011) Multivariate dynamical systems models for estimating causal interactions in fMRI. NeuroImage 54(2):807–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathian, K., Lacey, S., Stilla, R., Gibson, G., Deshpande, G., Hu, X., LaConte, S. & Glielmi, C. (2011) Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information. NeuroImage 57(2):462–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, J., Junior, E., Takahashi, D., Felix, M., Brammer, M. & Morettin, P. (2006) A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality. NeuroImage 31(1):187–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed