Abstract
This paper aims to assess the epistemological value of the notion of sympathy in Galen’s thought. It first shows that Galen makes use of two different concepts of sympathy: the ambient concept, according to which the human body manifests a harmonious part-whole relationship, and the technical concept, with which one connects two pathologies on the basis of the fact that the cause of the ailment is elsewhere than where it surfaces. Neither of these sympathies constitutes in itself a causal explanation of reality. The first merely acknowledges an obvious interrelationship, the second acts as an epistemic tool to shift the focus of diagnosis away from the place where the condition manifests itself. However, the two concepts are not absolutely unrelated; and they come together when the sympathetic paradigm is used to understand the unifying action of the psychic and natural faculties. Very significantly, Galen then provisionally defines the cause as a power or faculty (δύναμις) not out of theoretical necessity but for practical reasons.
Remerciements
Je tiens à remercier pour leurs précieuses remarques à divers moments de l’élaboration de ce texte, Ph. van der Eijk, M. Rashed, J.-B. Gourinat, les deux rapporteurs anonymes de l’article, et les participants du colloque d’Oxford sur la causalité médicale de 2016.
Références
Berryman, S. 2002. “Galen and the Mechanical Philosophy.” Apeiron. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 35 (3) : 235–54 https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.2002.35.3.235.Search in Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2001. “Galien face à la ‘peste antonine’ ou comment penser l’invisible.” In Air, miasmes et contagion. Les Épidémies dans l’Antiquité et au Moyen Âge, edited by S. Bazin-Tacchella, D. Quéruel, and É. Samama, 29–54. Langres: Guéniot.Search in Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. 2015. “Stoic Sympathy.” In Sympathy, edited by E. Schliesser, 15–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928873.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1961. “Hellenistische Pseudopythagorica.” Philologus. Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie 105 (1–2): 16–43 et 226–46, https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1961.105.12.16.Search in Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2014. “Galen on What is Persuasive (Pithanon) and What Approximates to Truth.” In Philosophical Themes in Galen, edited by P. Adamson, R. E. Hansberger, and J. Wilberdin (BICS Supplement 114), 61–88. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. 1991. “A Tale of Two Fishes. Magical Objects in Natural History from Antiquity through the Scientific Revolution.” Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (3): 373–98, https://doi.org/10.2307/2710043.Search in Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2015. “Faculties in Ancient Philosophy.” In The Faculties. A History, edited by D. Perler, 19–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199935253.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Cordonier, V. 2009. “De la transmission à la sympathie. Plotin et la désaffection du milieu perceptif (Enn. iv, 5 [29]).” Philosophie Antique. Problèmes, Renaissances, Usages 9: 35–69. [Néoplatonisme], https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.2562.Search in Google Scholar
Debru, A. 1991. “Expérience, plausibilité et certitude chez Galien.” In Galeno. Obra, pensamiento e influencia, edited by J. A. López Férez, 31–40. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.Search in Google Scholar
Debru, A. 1996. Le Corps respirant. La pensée physiologique chez Galien (Studies in Ancient Medicine 13). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004377387Search in Google Scholar
Delaurenti, B. 2016. La Contagion des émotions. Compassio, une énigme médiévale (Savoirs anciens et médiévaux 4). Paris: Classiques Garnier.Search in Google Scholar
Diller, H. 1936. “Eine stoisch-pneumatische Schrift im Corpus Hippocraticum.” Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 29 (3): 178–95.10.1515/9783110816754.17Search in Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. 2008. “Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, edited by R. J. Hankinson, 184–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.007Search in Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. 1937. “Greek Medicine in its Relation to Religion and Magic.” Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine 5 (3): 201–46.Search in Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. 1922. The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion, Abridged ed. New York: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-00400-3Search in Google Scholar
Gaide, F. 2003. “Aspects divers des principes de sympathie et d’antipathie dans les textes thérapeutiques latins.” In Rationnel et irrationnel dans la médecine ancienne et médiévale. Aspects historiques, scientifiques et culturels, edited by N. Palmieri, 129–44. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne.Search in Google Scholar
Gaillard-Seux, P. 2003. “Sympathie et antipathie dans l’Histoire Naturelle de Pline l’Ancien.” In Rationnel et irrationnel dans la médecine ancienne et médiévale. Aspects historiques, scientifiques et culturels, edited by N. Palmieri, 113–28. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne.Search in Google Scholar
Grmek, M. D., and D. Gourevitch. 1994. “Aux sources de la doctrine médicale de Galien : l’enseignement de Marinus, Quintus et Numisianus.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 37/2 [Wissenschaften (Medizin und Biologie [Forts.])]: 1491–528.Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1988. “Galien: la médecine et la philosophie antisceptique.” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 6/2: 229–69.Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1995. “Pollution and Infection. An Hypothesis Still-Born.” Apeiron. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 28 (1): 25–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.1995.28.1.25.Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2006. “Body and Soul in Galen.” In Common to Body and Soul. Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, edited by R. A. H. King, 232–58. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110196511.232Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2008. “Philosophy of Nature.” In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, edited by R. J. Hankinson, 210–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.008Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2009a. “Medicine and the Science of Soul.” Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 26/1: 129–54, https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.26.1.129.Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2009b. “Galen on the Limitations of Knowledge.” In Galen and the World of Knowledge (Greek Culture in the Roman World), edited by C. Gill, T. Whitmarsh, and J. Wilkins, 206–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770623.013Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2014. “Galen and the Ontology of Powers.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (5): 951–73. [Causing Health and Disease. Medical Powers in Classical and Late Antiquity], https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.988118.Search in Google Scholar
Henry, J. 1986. “Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory.” History of Science 24 (4): 335–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/007327538602400401.Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2012. “Sympathy between Hippocrates and Galen: The Case of Galen’s Commentary on Hippocrates’ Epidemics, Book Two.” In Epidemics in Context: Greek Commentaries on Hippocrates in the Arabic Tradition, edited by P. E. Pormann, 49–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110259803.49Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2013. “Disturbing Connections: Sympathetic Affections, Mental Disorder, and the Elusive Soul in Galen.” In Mental Disorders in the Classical World, edited by W. V. Harris, 147–76. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004249875_009Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2014a. “Galen on the Chances of Life.” In Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought, edited by V. Wohl, 230–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107279551.014Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2014b. “Proto-Sympathy in the Hippocratic Corpus.” In Hippocrate et les hippocratismes. Médecine, religion, société, edited by J. Jouanna, and M. Zink, 123–38. Paris: Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres.10.2307/j.ctvbtzpcn.11Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2015. “Galen’s Sympathy.” In Sympathy, edited by E. Schliesser, 61–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928873.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Hutchison, K. 1982. “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?” Isis. An International Review devoted to the History of Science and its Cultural Influence 73 (2): 233–53, https://doi.org/10.1086/352971.Search in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2006. “The Greek Concept of Sympatheia and its Byzantine Appropriation in Michael Psellos.” In The Occult Sciences in Byzantium, edited by P. Magdalino, and M. Mavroudi, 97–117. Genève: La Pomme d’or.Search in Google Scholar
Joly, R. 1975. “Remarques sur le De Alimento pseudo-hippocratique.” In Le Monde grec, pensée, littérature, histoire, documents, edited by J. Bingen, G. Cambier, and G. Nachtergael, 271–6. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Search in Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2001. “Air, miasme et contagion au temps d’Hippocrate et survivance des miasmes dans la médecine posthippocratique (Rufus d’Éphèse, Galien et Palladios).” In Air, miasmes et contagion. Les Épidémies dans l’Antiquité et au Moyen Âge, edited by S. Bazin-Tacchella, D. Quéruel, and É. Samama, 9–28. Langres: Guéniot.Search in Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2003. “La Notion de nature chez Galien.” In Galien et la philosophie, edited by J. Barnes, and J. Jouanna, 229–68. Genève: Fondation Hardt.Search in Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2011. “Médecine rationnelle et magie: le statut des amulettes et des incantations chez Galien.” Revue des Études Grecques 124 (1): 47–77, https://doi.org/10.3406/reg.2011.8041.Search in Google Scholar
Kazantzidis, G., ed. 2019. Medicine and Paradoxography in the Ancient World (Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes 81). Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110661774Search in Google Scholar
Keyser, P. T. 1997. “Science and Magic in Galen’s Recipes (Sympathy and Efficacy).” In Galen on Pharmacology. Philosophy, History and Medicine, edited by A. Debru, 175–98. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004377431_009Search in Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. 2004. “Aristotelian Dynamics in the 2nd Century School Debates: Galen and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Organic Powers and Movements.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic & Latin Commentaries, Vol. I (BICS Supplement 83.1), edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, and M. W. F. Stone, 71–95. London: Institute of Classical Studies.10.1111/j.2041-5370.2004.tb02296.xSearch in Google Scholar
Laurand, V. 2005. “La Sympathie universelle. Union et séparation.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 48 (4): 517–35. [Les Stoïciens et le monde], https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.054.0517.Search in Google Scholar
Leith, D. 2014. “Galen’s Refutation of Atomism.” In Philosophical Themes in Galen (BICS Supplement 114), edited by P. Adamson, R. E. Hansberger, and J. Wilberding, 213–34. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983. Science, Folklore and Ideology. Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Martelli, M. 2014. The Four Books of Pseudo-Democritus (Sources of Alchemy and Chemistry 1). Leeds: Maney Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Mauss, M., and H. Hubert. 1902–1903. “Esquisse d’une théorie générale de la magie.” L’Année sociologique 7: 1–146.Search in Google Scholar
Meeusen, M. 2014. “Plutarch and the Wonder of Nature. Preliminaries to Plutarch’s Science of Physical Problems.” Apeiron. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 47 (3): 310–41, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2012-0040.Search in Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1984. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, Vol. II (Peripatoi 6). Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1983. “The Seeds of Disease. An Explanation of Contagion and Infection from the Greeks to the Renaissance.” Medical History. An International Journal for the History of Medicine and Related Sciences 27 (1): 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300042241.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, R. C. T. 1983. Miasma. Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion (Clarendon Paperbacks). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2011. “Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary.” In Primary and Secondary Qualities. The Historical and Ongoing Debate, edited by L. Nolan, 41–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556151.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Poma, R. 2009. Magie et guérison. La rationalité de la médecine magique , XVIe–XVIIe. (Universités – Domaine littéraire). Paris: Orizons.Search in Google Scholar
Radice, R. 2000. Oikeiôsis. Ricerche sul fondamento del pensiero stoico e sulla sua genesi (Temi metafisici e problemi del pensiero antico 77). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Search in Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2006. “What the Hellenistic Philosophers Saw and Aristotle Avoided.” In Common to Body and Soul. Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, edited by R. A. H. King, 187–208. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110196511.187Search in Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1926. Kosmos und Sympathie. Neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios. München: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. 2011. “Galen on Unsayable Properties.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 297–317.Search in Google Scholar
Röhr, J. 1923. Der okkulte Kraftbegriff im Altertum (Philologus Supplementband 17.1). Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. “Galen’s Teleology and Functional Explanation.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 369–400.Search in Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. 1968. Galen’s System of Physiology and Medicine. An Analysis of His Doctrines and Observations on Bloodflow, Respiration, Tumors and Internal Diseases. Basel: Karger.Search in Google Scholar
Stemplinger, E. 1919. Sympathieglaube und Sympathiekuren in Altertum und Neuzeit. München: Gmelin.Search in Google Scholar
Sudhoff, K. F. J. 1915. “Vom Pestsamen’ des Galenos.” Mitteilungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 14: 227–9.Search in Google Scholar
Vallance, J. T. 1990. The Lost Theory of Asclepiades of Bithynia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198242482.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Weidlich, T. 1894. Die Sympathie in der antiken Literatur. Stuttgart: K. Hofbuchdruckerei C. Liebich.Search in Google Scholar
Zucker, A. 2000. “Élien et la magie naturelle des animaux.” In La Magie. Vol. II: La Magie dans l’antiquité grecque tardive. Les mythes, edited by A. Moreau, and J.-C. Turpin, 79–94. Montpellier: Publications de l’Université Montpellier III.Search in Google Scholar
Zucker, A. 2011. “Sympathies et antipathies naturelles. Au-delà du principe.” In Prolongements et renouvellements de la tradition classique, edited by A. Balansard, G. Dorival, and M. Loubet, 93–107. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
