Skip to main content
Log in

‘Ethical concepts regarding the genetic engineering of laboratory animals’

A confrontation with moral beliefs from the practice of biomedical research

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intrinsic value and animal integrity are two key concepts in the debate on the ethics of the genetic engineering of laboratory animals. These concepts have, on the one hand, a theoretical origin and are, on the other hand, based on the moral beliefs of people not directly involved in the genetic modification of animals. This ‘external’ origin raises the question whether these concepts need to be adjusted or extended when confronted with the moral experiences and opinions of people directly involved in the creation or use of transgenic laboratory animals. To answer this question, 35 persons from the practice of biomedical research who are directly involved in genetic engineering (scientists, biotechnicians, animal caretakers and laboratory animal scientists) were interviewed. They were asked to give their moral opinion on different aspects of the genetic engineering of animals and to react to statements about the concepts of intrinsic value and animal integrity. Analysis of the interviews showed that, contrary to what is often assumed, the respondents embraced these concepts, even those senses that (more) specifically apply to genetic engineering. And although the respondents raised some objections that go beyond issues of animal welfare, these objections could quite well be expressed in terms of the concepts of intrinsic value and animal integrity. In short, the results of the present study strongly suggest that these concepts do not have to be adjusted or extended in the light of the moral experiences and opinions from practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • F.W. Brom E. Schroten (1993) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Questions around Animal Biotechnology. The Dutch Approach’ Livestock Production Science 36 99–107 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0301-6226(93)90143-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Comstock (2000) Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case against Agricultural Biotechnology Kluwer Acedemic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger, F.R.: 1997, ‘Respect for Animal Integrity?’, in: A. Nordgren (ed.), Science, Ethics, Sustainability. Uppsala, pp. 243–252

  • E. Kac (2000) ‘GFP Bunny’ P.T. Dobrila A. Kostic (Eds) Eduardo Kac: Telepresence, Biotelematics, and Transgenic Art Kibla Maribor 101–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Paula, L.: 2001, Biotechnologie bij dieren ethisch getoetst? (with a summary in English) Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut

  • J. Rifkin (1985) Declaration of a Heretic Routledge & Kegan Paul Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Rollin (1995) The Frankenstein Syndrome. Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Rollin (1998) ‘On telos and Genetic Engineering’ A. Holland A. Johnson (Eds) Animal Biotechnology and Ethics Chapman & Hall London 156–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, L.J.E.: 1993, Het wel en wee der dieren (with a summary in English). PhD thesis, Utrecht University

  • L.J.E. Rutgers F.J. Grommers B. Colenbrander (1996) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Aspects of Invasive Reproduction Techniques in Farm Animals’ Reproduction in Domestic Animals 31 651–655

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J.E. Rutgers F.R. Heeger (1999) ‘Inherent worth and respect for animal integrity’ M. Dol (Eds) et al. Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals van Gorcum Assen 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Schroten (1998) ‘The ‘Herman Case’: the usefulness of the wide reflective equilibrium model for ethics committees’ W. Burg Particlevan der T. Willigenburg Particlevan (Eds) Reflective Equilibrium Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Small M. Fischer (2004) ‘Life Science Employees: Ethics and Attitudes Towards a Transgenic Cattle Project’ J. Tavernier ParticleDe S. Aerts (Eds) Science, Ethics & Society EurSafe 2004: 5th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics Leuven 149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Taylor (1986) Respect for Nature Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Verhoog (1992a) ArticleTitle‘The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals’ Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 147–160 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnitV2hug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01966357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoog, H.: 1992b, ‘Ethics and the Genetic Engineering of Animals’, in: Musschenga, Voorzanger and Soeteman, (eds.), Morality, Worldview and Law. (van Gorcum, Assen), pp. 267–278

  • J. Vorstenbosch (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Concept of Integrity. Its Significance for the Ethical Discussion on Biotechnology and Animals’ Livestock Production Science 36 109–112 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0301-6226(93)90144-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. de Vries.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Vries, R. ‘Ethical concepts regarding the genetic engineering of laboratory animals’. Med Health Care Philos 9, 211–225 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-0004-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-0004-5

Keywords

Navigation