Skip to main content
Log in

What is preferred about the preferred basis?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I introduce and review the most recent and most promising model of state vector reduction, that of Ghirardi, Rimini, Weber, and Pearle. This model requires the specification of a reduction basis. At least two questions therefore arise: Are there physical reasons to choose one basis rather than another? Does the choice made lead to any undesirable consequences? I argue that there arephysical reasons to choose from a certain class of reduction bases (a class which includes the choice made by the authors mentioned above), and that such a choice does not lead to problems, contra an argument by Albert and Vaidman.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Aicardi, A. Borsellino, G. C. Ghirardi, and R. Grassi,Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 109–128 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Z. Albert and L. Vaidman,Phys. Lett. A 139, 1–4 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Z. Albert and L. Vaidman, inBell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, M. Kafatos, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Z. Albert, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York), pp. 153–165.

  5. L. Arnold,Stochastic Differential Equations. Theory and Applications (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Bell, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Benatti,et al., Nuovo Cimento B 101, 333–355 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bohm and J. Bub,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 453 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. N. Butterfield, G. N. Fleming, G. C. Ghirardi, and R. Grassi,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32, 2287–2304 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Diosi,Phys. Lett. A 112, 288 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Diosi,Phys. Lett. A. 129, 419–423 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Diosi,Phys. Rev. A 40, 1165–1174 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Diosi, inQuantum Chaos-Quantum Measurement, P. Cvitanovic, I. Percival, and A. Wirzba, eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992), pp. 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, T. Weber,Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini,Phys. Rev. A 42, 78–89 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. C. Ghirardi and A. Rimini, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. C. Ghirardi and P. Pearle inPSA 1990, Vol. II, A. Fine, M. Forbes, and E. Wessels, eds. (Philosophy of Science Association, Lansing, Michigan, 1990), pp. 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and P. Pearle,Found. Phys. 20, 1271–1316 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. C. Ghirardi and R. Grassi,Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 25, 397–424.

  20. I. I. Gihman, A. V. Skorohod,The Theory of Stochastic Processes, Vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Gisin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1657–1660 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Gisin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1776 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Gisin,Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363–371 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Karakostas and M. Dickson,Synthese, forthcoming.

  25. P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. D 13, 857–868 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Pearle,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 489 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Pearle,J. Stat. Phys. 41, 719 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Pearle, inNew Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement, D. Greenberger, ed. (New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1986), pp. 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277–2289 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Pearle, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Pearle. inQuantum Chaos-Quantum Measurement, P. Cvitanovic, ed. (Kluwer Academic. The Netherlands, 1992), pp. 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Pearle. Hamilton College preprint, 1993.

  33. H. Primas,Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Schrödinger,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 3, 109–123 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickson, M. What is preferred about the preferred basis?. Found Phys 25, 423–440 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059229

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059229

Keywords

Navigation