Abstract
The article addresses the issue of rationing health care services, a topic currently being hotly debated in many countries. The author argues that the aspect of causal responsibility ought to play a decisive role in the allocation of limited medical resources. Starting out from Ronald Dworkin's distinction between “option luck” and “brute luck”, the appropriate and meaningful uses of the term “causal responsibility” are clarified first. A discussion of the conditions which might justify giving lower priority to patients whose illnesses are the result of unhealthy behavior, like e.g. alcohol abuse, follows. Causal responsibility is then viewed in the context of private health insurance and the club model of organ donation. It is argued that individuals themselves are basically responsible for their decisions regarding insurance coverage and membership in organ donors' clubs. Causal responsibility is shown to be a more suitable criterion for rationing scarce medical resources than other criteria which might alternatively be considered, such as patients' age.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arneson, R., Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare, Philosophical Studies 56 (1989), pp. 77–93.
Arneson, R., Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism, Ethics 110 (2000), pp. 339–349.
Beauchamp, T.L., and Childress, J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th Ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Beck, U., Gegengifte. Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.
Breyer, F., and Zweifel, P., Gesundheitsökonomie, 2nd Ed. Berlin: Springer, 1997.
Callahan, D., Setting Limits. Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987.
Cohen, C., and Benjamin, M., Alcoholics and Liver Transplantation, The Journal of the American Medical Association 265 (1991), pp. 1299–1301.
Cohen, G.A., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, Ethics 99 (1989), pp. 906–944.
Cotton, P., Alcohol's Threat to Liver Transplant Recipients May Be Overstated, Suggests Retrospective Study, The Journal of the American Medical Association 271 (1994), p. 1825.
Daniels, N., Just Health Care. Cambridge: University Press, 1985.
Daniels, N., Justice and Justification. Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Daniels, N., Rationing Medical Care – A Philosopher's Perspective on Outcomes and Process, Economics and Philosophy 14 (1998), pp. 27–50.
Dworkin, R., What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources, Philosophy & Public Affairs 10 (1981), pp. 283–345.
Dworkin, R., Justice in the Distribution of Health Care, McGill Law Journal 38 (1993), pp. 883–898.
Dworkin, R., Will Clinton's Plan Be Fair?, New York Review of Books (1994), pp. 20–25.
Engelhardt, H. T., The Foundation of Bioethics, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Kliemt, H., Gerechtigkeitskriterien in der Transplantationsmedizin – Eine ordoliberale Perspektive, in E. Nagel and C. Fuchs (eds.), Soziale Gerechtigkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 1993, pp. 262–283.
Kliemt, H., Wem gehören die Organe?, in J.S. Ach and M. Quante (eds.), Hirntod und Organverpflanzung. Ethische, medizinische, psychologische und rechtliche Aspekte der Transplantationsmedizin. Stuttgart and Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1997, pp. 271–287.
Kliemt, H., and Breyer, F., Solidargemeinschaften der Organspender, in P. Oberender (ed.), Transplantationsmedizin: Ökonomische, ethische, rechtliche und medizinische Aspekte. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995, pp. 135–160.
Kliemt, H., and Gubernatis, G., Solidarität und Rationierung in der Organtransplantation, Transplantationsmedizin 11 (1999), pp. 4–13.
Krämer, Walter, Altern und Gesundheitswesen: Probleme und Lösungen aus Sicht der Gesundheitsökonomie, in P.B. Baltes and J. Mittelstraβ (eds.), Zukunft des Alterns und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992, pp. 563–580.
Moss, A.H., and Siegler, M., Should Alcoholics Compete Equally for Liver Transplantation?, The Journal of the American Medical Association 265 (1991), pp. 1295–1298.
Rivlin, M.M., Can Age-Based Rationing of Health-Care Be Morally Justified?, The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 64 (1997), pp. 113–119.
Roemer, J., Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Schenker, S. et al., Should Patients with End-Stage Alcoholic Liver Disease Have a New Liver?, Hepatology 11 (1990), pp. 314–319.
Schmidt, M.G., Warum die Gesundheitsausgaben wachsen. Befunde des Vergleichs demokratisch verfasster Länder, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 40 (1999), pp. 229–245.
Schmidt, V.H., Veralltäglichung der Triage, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 25 (1996), pp. 419–437.
Shapiro, D, Why even Egalitarians Should Favor Market Health Insurance, Social Philosophy & Policy 15 (1998), pp. 84–132.
Veatch, R.M., Lebensstil, Gesundheitsrisiko und Solidarität, in H. Sass (ed.), Medizin und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1989, pp. 328–347.
Wikler, D., Personal Responsibility for Illness, in D. Van De Veer and T. Regan (eds.), Health Care Ethics. An Introduction. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987, pp. 326–358.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dietrich, F. Causal Responsibility and Rationing in Medicine. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5, 113–131 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014469905337
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014469905337