Abstract
Two major interpretations have been advanced for the sum res cogitans passage in Descartes’s Second Meditation. According to the first interpretation, he argues in this passage that only thinking belongs to his essence. According to the second interpretation, due to Anthony Kenny, Harry Frankfurt and others, no such claim is defended by Descartes. Rather, it is his aim to argue that only thinking can be ascribed to him with certainty. In this essay, it will be shown that the “naive”, essentialist reading of the sum res cogitans reasoning is closer to the text than the perhaps more sophisticated, purely epistemic reading. Although the interpretation defended here is not new, it will be arrived at by way of (hopefully) new arguments.
Ayers, M. 2005. „The Second Meditation and Objections to Cartesian Dualism“. In Early Modern Philosophy. Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. Hg. C. Mercer/E. O’Neill. Oxford/New York, 24–45.10.1093/0195177606.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Broughton, J. 2002. Descartes’s Method of Doubt. Princeton/Oxford.10.1515/9781400825042Search in Google Scholar
Carriero, J. P. 1986. „The Second Meditation and the Essence of the Mind“. In Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Hg. A. O. Rorty. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, 199–221.10.1525/9780520907836-012Search in Google Scholar
Carriero, J. P. 2009. Between Two Worlds. A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton/Oxford.10.1515/9781400833191Search in Google Scholar
Clarke, D. M. 2003. Descartes’s Theory of Mind. Oxford/New York.10.1093/0199261237.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1978. „Current Issues in the Philosophy of Mind“. American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 249–61.10.1007/978-94-009-1882-5_2Search in Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. 1970. Demons, Dreamers, and Madmen. The Defense of Reason in Descartes’s Meditations. Indianapolis/New York.Search in Google Scholar
Hooker, M. 1975. „Descartes’ Argument for the Claim that His Essence Is to Think“. Grazer Philosophische Studien 1, 143–63.10.5840/gps1975110Search in Google Scholar
Kemmerling, A. 2005. Ideen des Ichs. Studien zu Descartes’ Philosophie. 2. Aufl. Frankfurt/M.Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1968. Descartes. A Study of His Philosophy. New York/Toronto.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1986. Counterfactuals. 2. korr. Aufl. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Locke, D. 1981. „Mind, Matter, and the Meditations“. Mind 90, 343–66.10.1093/mind/XC.359.343Search in Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 1965. „Descartes’s Proof that His Essence Is Thinking“. The Philosophical Review 74, 315–38.10.1007/978-1-349-15265-0_15Search in Google Scholar
Markie, P. J. 1986. Descartes’s Gambit. Ithaca/London.Search in Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. 1988. Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Rev. u. erw. Fassung. Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Reith, H. R. 1986. René Descartes. The Story of a Soul. Lanham.Search in Google Scholar
Röd, W. 1987. Descartes’ Erste Philosophie. Versuch einer Analyse mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Cartesianischen Methodologie. 2. Aufl. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar
Rubenbauer, H./Hofmann, J. B. 1995. Lateinische Grammatik. 12. korr. Aufl. Bamberg/München.Search in Google Scholar
Schiffer, S. 1976. „Descartes on His Essence“. The Philosophical Review 85, 21–43.10.2307/2184253Search in Google Scholar
Schütt, H.-P. 1990. Substanzen, Subjekte und Personen. Eine Studie zum Cartesischen Dualismus. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Vinci, T. C. 1998. Cartesian Truth. Oxford/New York.10.1093/0195113292.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1978. Descartes. The Project of Pure Enquiry. London.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, M. D. 1982. Descartes. 2. korr. Aufl. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
