Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reinventing Richard Goldschmidt: Reputation, Memory, and Biography

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Richard Goldschmidt was one of the most controversial biologists of the mid-twentieth century. Rather than fade from view, Goldschmidt’s work and reputation has persisted in the biological community long after he has. Goldschmidt’s longevity is due in large part to how he was represented by Stephen J. Gould. When viewed from the perspective of the biographer, Gould’s revival of Goldschmidt as an evolutionary heretic in the 1970s and 1980s represents a selective reinvention of Goldschmidt that provides a contrast to other kinds of biographical commemorations by scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abir-Am, Pnina. 1982. “How Scientists View Their Heroes: Some Remarks on the Mechanism of Myth Construction.” Journal of the History of Biology 15: 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abir-Am, Pnina. 1985. “Themes, Genres and Orders of Legitimation in the Consolidation of New Scientific Disciplines: Deconstructing the History of Molecular Biology.” History of Science 23: 75–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abir-Am, Pnina. 1987. “The Biotheoretical Gathering, Transdisciplinary Authority and the Incipient Legitimation of Molecular Biology in the 1930s: New Perspective on the Historical Sociology of Science.” History of Science 25: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abir-Am, Pnina.@ 1999. “The First American and French Commemorations in Molecular Biology: From Collective Memory to Comparative History.” Commemorative Practices in Science: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Collective Memory, Osiris, 2nd Series 14: 324–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abir-Am, Pnina and Elliot, Clark. 1999. “Commemorative Practices in Science: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Collective Memory.” Osiris, 2nd Series 14: 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Janet. 2010. “Making Darwin: Biography and the Changing Representations of Charles Darwin.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 40: 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, Guy. 1982. “Goldschmidt’s Follies.” Paleobiology 8: 463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, John, Stent, Gunter and Watson, James (eds.). 1966/2007. Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Press.

  • Cantor, Geoffrey. 1996. “The Scientist as Hero: Public Images of Michael Faraday.” Michael Shortland and Richard Yeo (eds.), Telling Lives Science: Essays on Scientific Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. A. 1966. The Gene: A Critical History. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, Brian, Lande, R. and Slatkin, M. 1982. “A Neo-Darwinian Commentary on Macroevolution.” Evolution 36: 474–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, Nathaniel. 2008. “Rebellion and Iconoclasm in the Life and Science of Barbara McClintock.” Oren Harman and Michael R. Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela. 2010. “The Paradox of the Phage Group: Essay Review.” The Journal of the History of Biology 43: 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gergory K., Dietrich, Michael R. and Jacobs, David. 2009. “Homeotic Mutants and the Assimilation of Developmental Genetics into the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Joe Cain and Michael Ruse (eds.), Descended from Darwin: Insights into American Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, pp. 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 1995. “Richard Goldschmidt’s “Heresies” and the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Journal of the History of Biology 28: 431–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R.@ 1998. “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution Within Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 85–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M. R. 2000. “From Hopeful Monsters to Homeotic Effects: Richard Goldschmidt’s Integration of Development, Evolution, and Genetics.” American Zoologist 40: 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 2003. “Richard Goldschmidt: Hopeful Monsters and Other “Heresies”.” Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 2008. “Striking the Hornet’s Nest: Richard Goldschmidt’s Rejection of the Particulate Gene.” Oren Harman and Michael R. Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 2009. “Microevolution and Macroevolution are Governed by the Same Processes.” Francisco J. Ayala and Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. New York: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 169–179.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1940. “Catastrophism Versus Evolutionism.” Science 97: 356–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1941. Genetics and the Origin of Species, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassberg, David. 1996. “Public History and the Study of Memory.” The Public Historian 18: 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1911. “Über die Vererbung der sekundären Geschlechtscharaktere.” Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft fÜr Morphologie und Physiologie in MÜnchen 27: 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1931. Die sexuellen Zwischenstufen. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1934. “Lymantria.” Bibliographia Genetica 111: 1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1938. Physiological Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1944. On Some Facts Pertinent to the Theory of the Gene. In Science in the University. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 183–210.

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1945. “The Structure of Podoptera, a Homeotic Mutant of Drosophila melanogaster.” Journal of Morphology 77: 71–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1946. “‘An Empirical Evolutionary Generalization’ Viewed from the Standpoint of Phenogenetics.” American Naturalist 80: 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1952a. “Homeotic Mutants and Evolution.” Acta Biotheoretica 10: 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1952b. “A Further Study of Homeosis in Drosophila melanogaster.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 119: 405–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1960. In and Out of the Ivory Tower. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1977. “The Return of Hopeful Monsters.” Natural History 86: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1980. “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?” Paleobiology 6: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1981/1994. Evolution as Fact and Theory, from Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, pp. 253–262.

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1982a. The Uses of Heresy: An Introduction to Richard Goldschmidt’s The Material Basis of Evolution. In The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. xiii–xlii.

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1982b. “The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and Its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution.” R. Milkman (ed.), Perspectives on Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1982c. “Change in Developmental Timing as a Mechanism of Macroevolution.” J. T. Bonner (ed.), Evolution and Development. Berlin: Springer, pp. 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1983. “The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis.” Marjorie Grene (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. C. and Wilson, Alan. 1975. “Evolution at Two Levels in Humans and Chimpanzees.” Science 188: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, Russ. 1980. “Genetic Variation and Phenotypic Evolution in Allopatric Speciation.” American Naturalist 116: 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J., Prokofyeva, A. and Raffel, D. 1935. “Minute Intergenic Rearrangement as a Cause of Apparent ‘Gene Mutation’.” Nature 135: 253–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olby, Robert. 2009. Francis Crick: Hunter of Life’s Secrets. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffel, D. and Muller, H. J. 1940. “Position Effect and Gene Divisibility Considered in Connection with Three Strikingly Similar Scute Mutations.” Genetics 25: 541–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Marsha. 1986. Richard Goldschmidt and Sex Determination: The Growth of German Genetics, 1900–1935. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Ronshaugen, M., McGinnis, N. and McGinnis, W. 2002. “Hox Protein Mutation and Macroevolution of the Insect Body Plan.” Nature 415: 914–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan. 1990. “The Nine Lives of Gregor Mendel.” H. E. Le Grand (ed.), Experimental Inquiries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski, David. 2008. “Stephen Jay Gould, Darwinian Iconoclast?” Oren Harman and Michael R. Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Modern Biology. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski, David. 2009. “The Emergence of Paleobiology.” D. Sepkoski and M. Ruse (eds.), The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the History of Recent Paleontology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1953. Major Features of Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis, V. B. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis, V. B. 1999. “The 1959 Darwin Centennial Celebration in America.” Commemorative Practices in Science: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Collective Memory, Osiris, 2nd series 14: 274–323.

  • Smocovitis, V. B. 2005. “‘It Ain’t over ‘Til It’s over’: Rethinking the Darwinian Revolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 38: 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Curt. 1980. “Richard B. Goldschmidt (1878–1958): A Biographical Memoir.” L. K. Piternick (ed.), Richard Goldschmidt: Controversial Geneticist and Creative Biologist. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 68–99.

  • Templeton, Alan. 1982. “Review of the Material Basis of Evolution by R. Goldschmidt.” Paleobiology 8: 474–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Monster Mutation Theory,” in Creation-Evolution Encylopedia. http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/10mut12.htm. Accessed 21 Apr 2010.

  • Wright, S. 1941. “The Material Basis of Evolution by R. Goldschmidt (Review).” The Scientific Monthly 53: 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1950. “Population Structure as a Factor in Evolution.” H. Grünberg and W. Ulrich (eds.), Moderne Biologie: Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Nachtsheim. Berlin: F. W. Peters, pp. 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA

    Michael R. Dietrich

Authors
  1. Michael R. Dietrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Dietrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietrich, M.R. Reinventing Richard Goldschmidt: Reputation, Memory, and Biography. J Hist Biol 44, 693–712 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9271-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9271-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation