Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discerning the motives that lead businesspeople to make ethical decisions in economic contexts is important, for it aids the moral evaluation of such decisions. But conventional economic theory has for too long assumed an egoist model of motivation, to which many contrast an altruist view of ethical choices. The result is to see business decision making as implying dilemmas. On the other hand, we argue, if one assumes multiple motives, economic and ethical, in ordinary business decisions, a more fruitful model of ethical motivation in such decisions emerges. In this paper multiple motives are assumed to be the norm in a world of large organizations, complex decisions and stakeholder management. An example of a technology acquisition decision, with environmental overtones is presented in illustration of this approach. A method for discerning motives, primarily in terms of behavioural efficacy is presented. On this basis a two step approach to morally evaluating mixed motives in business decisions is proposed. First, the fit of motives with substantive ethical values should be ascertained, and then the efficacy of moral motives in yielding ethical behaviour and outcomes should be determined. This approach, we conclude, offers a much more concrete model of the actual role of moral motives in business decision making. It also signals the importance of moral learning in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Di Norcia, V.: 1990, ‘Communications, Time and Power: An Innisian View’, Canadian Journal of Political Science XXIII, 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Norcia, V., B. Cotton and J. Dodge: 1995, ‘Environmental Performance and Technology in Mining’, Sudbury '95: Mining and the Environment. Conference Proceedings 1, 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, V.: 1986, Moral Issues in Business(Wadsworth, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K.: 1970, Beyond Economics(University of Michigan, Ann Arbor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. and R. Duska: 1990, Business Ethics, 2d ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. and T. Beauchamp, eds.: 1997, Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. I.: 1988, Rationality(Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A.: 1985, Ethics, Efficiency and Markets(Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, P. and J. Moulden: 1991, Green is Gold(Harper, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, J.: 1991, ‘Planning and Chaos Theory’, American Planning Association Journal 44, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. and A. McGovern: 1988, Ethical Dilemmas in the Modern Corporation(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. and J. Cobb: 1989, For the Common Good(Beacon, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.: 1991, Greening Business(Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Tom: 1984, Corporations and Morality(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter: 1982, ‘The Matter of Business Ethics’, The Changing World of the Executive(Times, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter: 1993, Post-Capitalist Society(Harper, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai: 1988, The Moral Dimension(Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. and D. Gilbert: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton: 1962, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business’, Capitalism and Freedom(University of Chicago, Chicago), pp. 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H.: 1983, Frames of Mind(Basic Books).

  • Janis, I.: 1971, ‘Groupthink’, Psychology Today 5, 43–46, 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. and L. Mann: 1977, Decision Making(Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. and J. A. Conger: 1993, ‘Promoting “Altruism as a Corporate Goal”’, Academy of Management Executive 7, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Charles: 1987, The Destructive Achiever(Reading, Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B.: 1993, Fuzzy Thinking(Hyperion).

  • Kropotkin, P.: 1968, Mutual Aid(Blom, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.: 1981, ‘Muddling Through’, in H. Igor Ansoff (ed.), Business Strategy(Penguin, New York), pp. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarland, D. E.: 1988, Management and Society(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue(University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Olsen J. P.: 1982, Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations(Universitatsforlaget, Oslo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, Cash: 1988, Strategic Intervention in Organizations(Sage, Newbury Park).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. and P. Freiberger: 1993, Fuzzy Logic(Simon & Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, Alex: 1995, A Pragmatic Approach to Business Ethics(Sage, Newbury Park).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry: 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work(Harper, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Laura: 1989, ‘Ethics Without the Sermon’, in K. Andrews (ed.), Ethics in Practice(Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass), pp. 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Laura: 1990, Good Intentions Aside(Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, David: 1987, Just Rewards(Key Porter, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastin, M.: 1986, The Hard Problems of Management(Jossey Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, David: 1984, Motivated Irrationality(Oxford, New York).

  • Peters, R. S.: 1960, The Concept of Motivation(Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and R. Waterman: 1983, In Search of Excellence(Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, D. and W. Waluchow: 1991, Business Ethics in Canada, 2d ed. (Prentice Hall, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.: 1993, The Work of Nations(Knopf).

  • Sahlins, Marshall: 1972, Stone Age Economics(Aldine, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred: 1970, Collected Papers(Nijhoff, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya: 1990, Ethics and Economics(Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam: 1976, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeyenbos, J., R. Almeder and J. Humber: 1983, Business Ethics(Prometheus, Buffalo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Robert: 1993, Ethics and Excellence(Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. and K. Hansen: 1994, Above the Bottom Line(Harcourt, Brace, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B.: 1995, ‘Creativity Heuristics for Impasse Resolution: Reframing Intractable Negotiations’, Annals of the Academy of Political Science 542(November), 81–99.

  • Stark, Andrew: 1993, ‘What's the Matter with Business Ethics?’ Harvard Business Review 61, 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead W. E. and J. Stead: 1992, Managing for a Small Planet(Sage, Newbury Park).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, Lester: 1984, Dangerous Currents(Penguin, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. R. ed.: 1970, Alfred Schutz on Phenomenology and Social Relations(University of Chicago, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. and A. Gouldson: 1993, Environmental Management and Business Strategy(Pitman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F. and J. D. Aram: 1988, Managerial Dilemmas(Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy(Harvard up).

  • Wilson, B., ed.: 1970, Rationality(Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P.: 1958, The Idea of a Social Science(Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Donna J.: 1990, Business and Society(Scott Foresman Little Brown, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sudbury, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6, Canada

    Vincent Di Norcia (Professor of Philosophy)

  2. 100 Regional Court #1C, Flemington, NJ, 08822-1237, U.S.A.

    Joyce Tigner Larkins

Authors
  1. Vincent Di Norcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joyce Tigner Larkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Norcia, V., Larkins, J.T. Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25, 1–13 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006053706207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006053706207

Search

Navigation