Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a historical contextualization of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its political role. CSR, we propose, is one form of business–society interactions reflecting a unique ideological framing. To make that argument, we compare contemporary CSR with two historical ideal-types. We explore in turn paternalism in nineteenth century Europe and managerial trusteeship in early twentieth century US. We outline how the political responsibilities of business were constructed, negotiated, and practiced in both cases. This historical contextualization shows that the frontier between economy and polity has always been blurry and shifting and that firms have played a political role for a very long time. It also allows us to show how the nature, extent, and impact of that political role changed through history and co-evolved in particular with shifts in dominant ideologies. Globalization, in that context, is not the driver of the political role of the firm but a moderating phenomenon contributing significantly to the dynamics of this shift. The comparison between paternalism, trusteeship, and contemporary CSR points to what can be seen as functional equivalents—alternative patterns of business–society interactions that each correspond, historically, to unique and distinct ideological frames. We conclude by drawing implications for future theorizing on (political) CSR and stakeholder democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquier, A., Gond, J. P., & Pasquero, J. (2011). Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s legacy: The unachieved agenda and continuing relevance of social responsibilities of the businessman. Business & Society, 50, 607–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Voices of the governed: Towards a theory of the translocal. Organization, 18(3), 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, H. (1995). Origins of the authoritarian welfare state in Prussia, 1815-1870. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1995). The panopticon writings. Ed. and intro. M. Bozovic. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). Modern corporation and private property. London and New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boli, J. (2006). The rationalization of virtue and virtuosity in world society. In M. L. Djelic & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance (pp. 95–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R., & Rosenthal, S. (2004). Stakeholder theory and public policy: How governments matter. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(1), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., & Pedersen, O. (Eds.). (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1990). Scale and scope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheal, D. J. (1979). Hegemony, ideology and contradictory consciousness. The Sociological Quarterly, 20(1), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M. (1926). Social control of business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, J. (2003). Léon Harmel. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colli, A., Perez, P., & Rose, M. (2003). National determinants of family firm development. Enterprise and Society, 4(1), 28–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1981). The business response to Keynes, 1929-1964. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Driver, C., Kaler, J., Parker, M., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Stakeholder democracy: Towards a multi-disciplinary view. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2008). Fear and loathing in the JCC: Unleashing the monster of ‘New Corporate Citizenship Theory’ to confront category crisis. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 29(March), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, M., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation, and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, L. (2010). GONGOs. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), International encyclopedia of civil society (pp. 779–783). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (2003). Cosmopolitanism moral and political. Political Theory, 31(3), 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W., & McGoey, L. (2012). Rationalities of ignorance: On financial crises and the ambivalence of neo-liberal epistemology. Economy and Society, 41(1), 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debouzy, M. (1988). Permanence du paternalisme? Le Mouvement Social, 3–16.

  • De Bry, F. (1980). Le paternalisme dans l’opinion des industriels français au XIXème siècle. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris-I.

  • De Geer, H., Borglund, T., & Frostenson, M. (2009). Reconciling CSR with the role of the corporation in Welfare States: The problematic Swedish example. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L. (1998). Exporting the American model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L. (2006). Marketization: From intellectual agenda to global policy making. In M. L. Djelic & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance (pp. 53–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L., & Amdam, R. P. (2007). Americanization in comparative perspective: The managerial revolution in France and Norway, 1940-1990. Business History, 49(4), 483–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, E. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? (pp. 1145–1163). XLV: Harvard Law Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donham, W. B. (1927). The social significance of business. Harvard Business Review, II, 401–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, H., & Glick, W. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstadt, N. (1973). What history tells us about corporate responsibilities. Business and Society Review, 7, 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editors, Fortune. (1949). The moral history of U.S. business. Fortune, XL(6), 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2008). Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth? Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 771–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2012). Discourse and normative business ethics. In C. Lütge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics (pp. 549–580). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (1932). Discussion of some sociological principles underlying the community chest movement. Social Forces, 10(4), 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1987 [1844]). The condition of the working class in England. London: Penguin Books.

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.

  • Fleming, P., & Jones, M. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fooks, G., Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13. Last retrieved January 2014 from http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html.

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, M. (1976). La grève d’Anzin de 1884 et Germinal. Cahiers Naturalistes, XXII(50), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J. B. (1881). Comment s’accomplit le progrès social ? Le Devoir, February 27, 129–130.

  • Gueslin, A., & Jones, M. (1993). Michelin, les hommes du pneu. Paris: Ed. ouvrières.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiol, P. (2000). L’expérience Godin ou les ‘équivalents de la richesse’. Panoramiques, 46(2), 94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1990). Two kinds of ‘New Historicism’ for philosophers. New Literary History, 21(3), 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (2007). Historicity and sociohistorical research. In W. Outhwaite & S. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 82–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, L. (1889). Catéchisme du patron. Paris: Aux bureaux du journal la corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). Special topic: Democracy in and around organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social responsibilities of business managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17(1), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heald, M. 2005 [1970]. The social responsibilities of business. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  • Heath, J., Moriarty, J., & Norman, W. (2010). Business ethics and (or as) political philosophy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, T. (2005). Four ideal-type organizational responses to New Public Management reforms and some consequences. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1981). Essays in trespassing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1996[1962]). The age of revolution: 1789-1848. Vintage: First Vintage Books Edition.

  • Hoffman, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: An institutional perspective. Journal of Management History, 13(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höllerer, M. A. (2013). From taken-for-granted to explicit commitment: The rise of CSR in a corporatist country. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 573–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsfall, D. (2013). A fuzzy set ideal-type approach to measuring the competition state. Policy and Society, 32(4), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D. (1984). From the American system to mass production: 1800–1932. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Ite, U. (2004). Multinationals and CSR in developing countries: A case study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. T., & Haigh, M. (2007). The transnational corporation and new corporate citizenship Theory. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, P. (1980). Work, society and politics: The culture of the factory in later Victorian England. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, D. (1997). Expanding class: Power and everyday politics in industrial communities, The Netherlands 1850-1950. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (2015). Who has been regulating whom, business or society? The mid-20th-century institutionalization of “corporate responsibility” in the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 13(1), 125–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, I. (2014). Fear itself: The New Deal and the origins of our time. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, I., & Zolberg, A. R. (Eds.). (1996). Working-class formation. Nineteenth century patterns in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, R. (2010). From higher aims to hired hands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (1989). Organizational, institutional and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4), 540–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman, D. (2012). ‘Free us up so we can be responsible!’ The co-evolution of CSR and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirstein, L. E. (1932). The challenge to businessmen. The Survey, October 15, 501-503.

  • Lallement, M. (2009). Le travail de l’utopie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D., & Jordana, J. (Eds.) (2005). The rise of regulatory capitalism. In The annals of the American academy of political and social science, Vol. 598. London: Sage.

  • Levy, D., & Kaplan, R. (2008). CSR and theories of global governance: Strategic contestation in global issue arenas. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lyon, L. (1922). Education for business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T., & Barney, J. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L. (2000). An economic history of Sweden. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, J., & Kasanen, E. (2014). Boundaries between business and politics: A study on the division of moral labor. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2419-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 649–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2013). Globalization, national politics and corporate social responsibility. In R. Tainio, S. Merilainen, J. Mäkinen, & M. Laihonen (Eds.), Limits of globalization (pp. 219–235). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, R. (1985). Advertising the American dream. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marens, R. (2008). Recovering the past: Reviving the legacy of the early scholars of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management History, 14(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marens, R. (2012). Generous in victory? American managerial autonomy, labour relations and the invention of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marens, R. (2013). What comes around: The early 20th century American roots of legitimating corporate social responsibility. Organization, 20(3), 454–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark-Ungericht, B., & Weiskopf, R. (2007). Filling the empty shell. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005a). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005b). What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues. Business Ethics, 14(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1–2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit” and “explicit” CSR. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1967[1925]). The Gift. Norton, MA: Norton Library.

  • McCraw, T. (Ed.). (1997). Creating modern capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, C. D. (2006). The world’s newest profession: Management consulting in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. (2002). Corporate irresponsibility. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navin, T., & Sears, M. (1953). The Rise of a market for industrial securities, 1887-1902. Business History Review, 29(2), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, N. J. (1994). Lifelong care and control paternalism in nineteenth-century factory communities. Ethnologia Scandinavica, 24, 70–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noiriel, G. (1988). Du “patronage” au “paternalisme”. Le Mouvement Social, 144, 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, F. (2002[1933]). An early history of the economic institutions of Europe. Washington, DC: Beard Books.

  • Padelford, W., & White, D. W. (2009). The shaping of a society’s economic ethos: A longitudinal study of individuals’ morality of profit-making worldview. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. (2002). The open corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. (1965). The genesis of modern management. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A., & Griffin, J. (2012). Corporate responsibility, multinational corporations, and nation states: An introduction. Business and Politics, 14(3), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, J. (1987). Theories of the welfare state. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. (1997). The fallacy of non-interference: The poor panopticon and equality of opportunity. Journal of Bentham Studies, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. (1985). Industrial paternalism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 27(4), 579–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renouard, C., & Lado, H. (2012). RSE et justice sociale: Le cas des multinationales pétrolières dans le Delta du Niger. Afrique et Développement, 37(2), 167–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, U. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 625–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1958). Tory paternalism and social reform in early Victorian England. The American Historical Review, 63(2), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, F.D. (1936). A rendezvous with destiny. Speech before the 1936 National Democratic Convention, Philadelphia, June 27. Retrieved 20 October 2014 from http://www.austincc.edu/lpatrick/his2341/fdr36acceptancespeech.htm.

  • Rotter, J. P., Airike, P.-E., & Mark-Herbert, C. (2014). Exploring political corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 581–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, W. (1997). Socializing capital. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (1985). Historical alternatives to mass production: Politics, markets, and technology in nineteenth-century industrialization. Past and Present, 108, 133–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A. (1958). The coming of the New Deal—The age of Roosevelt (Vol. 2). Boston: Hougthon Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (1981). On the origin of ideology. Acta Sociologica, 24(1–2), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Screpanti, E., & Zamagni, S. (2005). An outline of the history of economic thought (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Segerlund, L. (2010). Making CSR a global concern. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, B. (2014). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, M. (1980). Corporate reconstruction of American capitalism, 1890–1916. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (Ed.). (1984). Vision and method in historical sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliva, R. (2007). Landscape Stories: Using ideal type narratives as a heuristic device in rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. (1995a). What’s political or cultural about political culture and the public sphere? Towards an historical sociology of concept formation. Sociological Theory, 13(2), 113–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. (1995b). Narrating and naturalizing civil society and citizenship theory: The place of political culture and the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 13(3), 229–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B. (2008). Business responsibilities in a divided world. Enterprise & Society, 9(2), 314–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, F., Harris, S., Kaysen, C., & Tobin, J. (1956). The American business creed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., & Driver, C. (2005). Stakeholder champions: How to internationalize the corporate social responsibility agenda. Business Ethics, 14(1), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokar, B. (1997). Earth for sale. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, A. (1997). The business of benevolence: Industrial paternalism in corporate America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dülmen, R. (1989). Industriekultur an der Saar: Leben und Arbeit in einer Industrieregion 1840-1914. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout, H. (2005). Corporate citizenship: An idea whose time has not yet come. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 677–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout, H. (2007). Authority and democracy in corporate governance? Journal of Business Ethics, 71(4), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4).

  • Watkins, J. (1952). Ideal types and historical explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3(9), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949[1904]). ‘Objectivity’ in social science and social policy. In Shils, E. & Finch, H. (Eds.), Max Weber: The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe: The Free Press.

  • Weber, M. (1978[1922]). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California.

  • Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 709–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H., & Willke, G. (2008). Corporate moral legitimacy and the legitimacy of morals: A critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2014). Case-study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yogev, E. (2001). Corporate hand in academic glove—The case of the Harvard group in the 1920’s. American Studies International, 39(1), 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. (1929). Address of Owen D. Young, January 1929. In J. Sears (Ed.), The new place of the stockholder (p. 209). New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2004). Responsibility and global labor justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(4), 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zunz, O. (2011). Philanthropy in America: A history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the Editors of the Special Issue for very useful comments and suggestions throughout the revision process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESSEC Business School, Avenue B. Hirsch, BP 90405, Cergy-Pontoise Cedex, France

    Marie-Laure Djelic & Helen Etchanchu

Authors
  1. Marie-Laure Djelic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen Etchanchu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Laure Djelic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djelic, ML., Etchanchu, H. Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective. J Bus Ethics 142, 641–661 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation