doiSerbia

Problems of normative strenght and critique within the concept of agonistic participation: Towards the complementarity of agonistic and participatory democracy

Đorđević Biljana (Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd)

In this article I argue that there are grounds for considering agonistic democracy and participatory democracy complementarity in order to institutionalize agonism which has thus far lacked an elaborate articulation of its institutional dimension. The two democratic theories share a commitment toward widening the scope of the political as a way of inclusion of citizens and their subsequent political subjectivation and empowerment. Furthermore, there are authors on both sides who think democracy does not need foundations. Agonistic participation and contestation, on the one hand, and the broadening and strengthening of various sectors of political participation, on the other, both open up new possibilities for critique and change, but also create new risks. Building on a redefinition of agonisitic participation, I aim to attenuate an objection that agonism is normatively weak in terms of lacking resources to motivate citizens and justify their critique of practices of domination and oppression. The article concludes that we need to embrace agonistic participation as a means towards the development of democratic political judgement, as there are no other guarantees, i.e. secure foundations, for our ability to distinguish between democratic and non-democratic agon.

Keywords: agonistic democracy, participatory democracy, post-foundationalism, contestation, participation, abolitionist equality, critique, normative strength

Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 47026: Konstitucionalizam i vladavina prava u izgradnji nacionalne države - slučaj Srbije