Skip to main content
Log in

The first axiomatization of relevant logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a review, with historical and critical comments, of a paper by I. E. Orlov from 1928, which gives the oldest known axiomatization of the implication-negation fragment of the relevant logic R. Orlov's paper also foreshadows the modal translation of systems with an intuitionistic negation into S4-type extensions of systems with a classical, involutive, negation. Orlov introduces the modal postulates of S4 before Becker, Lewis and Gödel. Orlov's work, which seems to be nearly completely ignored, is related to the contemporancous work on the axiomatization of intuitionistic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann W., 1925, Begründung des “tertium non datur” mittels der Hilbertschen Theorie der Widerspruchsfreiheit,Mathematische Annalen 93, pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A. R. and Belnap N. D. Jr, 1975,Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker O., 1930, Zur Logik der Modalitäten,Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 11, pp. 497–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer L. E. J., 1925, Zur Begründung der intuitionistischen Mathematik, I,Mathematische Annalen 93, pp. 244–257 (reprinted in Brouwer, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer L. E. J., 1925a, Intuitionistische Zerlegung mathematischer Grundbegriffe,Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 33, pp. 251–256 (reprinted in Brouwer, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer L. E. J., 1975,Collected Works, vol. I: Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagrov, A. and Zakharyashchev, M., 1990, Modal companions of intermediate logics: A survey (manuscript).

  • Church A., 1936, A bibliography of symbolic logic,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 1, pp. 121–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church A., 1951, The weak theory of implication, in: A. Menne et al. eds.Kontroliertes Denken: Untersuchungen zum Logikkalkül und zur Logik der Einzelwissenschaften, Alber, Munich, pp. 22–37 (abstract: The weak positive implicational calculus,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1951), p. 238).

    Google Scholar 

  • Došen K., 1986, Modal translations and intuitionistic double negation,Logique et Analyse (N.S.)29, pp. 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Došen K., 1988, Sequent-systems and groupoid models, I and II,Studia Logica 47, pp. 353–385,48 (1989), pp. 41–65,49 (1990), p. 614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Došen K., 1990, Modal translations of Heyting and Peano arithmetic,Publications de l'Institut Mathématique (N.S.)47(61), pp. 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Došen K., 1992, Modal translations in substructural logics,Journal of Philosophical Logic 21, pp. 283–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn J. M., 1986, Relevance logic and entailment, in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner eds,Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. III: Alternatives to Classical Logic D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 117–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen G., 1935, Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen,Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, pp. 176–210, 405–431 (English translation in:The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland, Amsterdam. 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard J.-Y., 1987, Linear logic,Theoretical Computer Science 50, pp. 1–102.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glivenko V. I., 1928, Sur la logique de M. Brouwer,Académic Royale de Belgique, Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences (5e série)14, pp. 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glivenko V. I., 1929, Sur quelques points de la Logique de M. Brouwer,Académie Royale de Belgique, Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences (5e série)15, pp. 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel K., 1933, Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls,Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 4, pp. 39–40 (reprinted with English translation in K. Gödel,Collected Works, vol. I: Publications 1929–1936, Oxford University Press, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A., 1930, Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik,Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, pp. 42–56.

  • Heyting A., 1930a, Sur la logique intuitioniste,Académie Royale de Belgique, Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences (5e série)16, pp. 957–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting A., 1971,Intuitionism: An Introduction, third revised edition, North-Holland, Amsterdam (first edition 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting A., 1978, History of the foundation of mathematics,Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde (3)26, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert D., 1923, Die logischen Grundlagen der Mathematik,Mathematische Annalen 88, pp. 151–165 (reprinted in: D. Hilbert,Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. 3, Springer, Berlin, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes G. F. and Cresswell M. J., 1968,An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khinchin A. I., 1928, Objection à une note de MM. Barzin et Errera,Académie Royale de Belgique, Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences (5c série)14, pp. 223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov A. N., 1925, On the principle of excluded middle (in Russian),Matematicheski\>i Sbornik 32, pp. 646–667 (English translation in: J. van Heijenoort ed.,From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratowski K., 1992, Sur l'opération Ā de l'Analysis Situs,Fundamenta Mathematicae 3, 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C. I. and Langford C. H., 1932,Symbolic Logic, Century, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moh Shaw-Kwei, 1950, The deduction theorems and two new logical systems,Methodos 2, pp. 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlov I. E., 1928, The calculus of compatibility of propositions (in Russian),Matematicheskii Sbornik 35, pp. 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley R., Meyer R. K. et al., 1982,Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, pt I: The Basic Philosophical and Semantical Theory, Ridgeview, Atascadero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troelstra A. S., 1990, On the early history of intuitionistic logic, in: P. P. Petkov ed.,Mathematical Logic, Plenum, New York, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Stigt W. P., 1990,Brouwer's Intuitionism. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Došen, K. The first axiomatization of relevant logic. J Philos Logic 21, 339–356 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260740

Keywords

Navigation