No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Integrative design for thought-experiments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2024
Abstract
Integrative experiment design should be extended to thought-experiments. Thought-experiments are closely connected to “real” experiments. They are involved in devising the design space of theories and possible experiments. The latter may be partitioned into experiments to be really performed and mere thought-experiments. The proposed extension of integrative experiment design lends guidance to a more methodical performance of thought-experiments.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., … Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. (1991). Thought experiments: A platonic account. In Thought experiments in science and philosophy (pp. 119–128). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dewitt, B., Fischhoff, B., & Salin, N. E. (2019). “Moral machine” experiment is no basis for policymaking. Nature, 567(7746), 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00766-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohrn, D. (2018). Thought experiments without possible worlds. Philosophical Studies 175, 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0871-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. In Virtues and vices (pp. 5–15). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. R. (2005). Sociological thought experiments: Five examples from the history of sociology. Sociological Origins, 3(2), 3–19 .Google Scholar
Kornberger, M., & Mantere, S. (2020). Thought experiments and philosophy in organizational research. Organization Theory, 1(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720942524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (2017). Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, N. J. (2007). Thought experimenting as mental modeling: Empiricism without logic. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 7(20), 125–161.Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (2004). On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument? Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1086/425238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praëm, S. K., & Steglich-Petersen, A. (2015). Philosophical thought experiments as heuristics for theory discovery. Synthese, 192(9), 2827–2842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0684-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, M. T. (2020). The productive anarchy of scientific imagination. Philosophy of Science, 87(5): 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1086/710629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Beyond playing 20 questions with nature: Integrative experiment design in the social and behavioral sciences
Related commentaries (31)
Against naïve induction from experimental data
Are language–cognition interactions bigger than a breadbox? Integrative modeling and design space thinking temper simplistic questions about causally dense phenomena
Assume a can opener
Beyond integrative experiment design: Systematic experimentation guided by causal discovery AI
Commensurability engineering is first and foremost a theoretical exercise
Confidence in research findings depends on theory
Consensus meetings will outperform integrative experiments
Dimensional versus conceptual incommensurability in the social and behavioral sciences
Discovering the unknown unknowns of research cartography with high-throughput natural description
Diversity of contributions is not efficient but is essential for science
Don't let perfect be the enemy of better: In defense of unparameterized megastudies
Eliminativist induction cannot be a solution to psychology's crisis
Experiment commensurability does not necessitate research consolidation
Explore your experimental designs and theories before you exploit them!
Getting lost in an infinite design space is no solution
Individual differences do matter
Integrative design for thought-experiments
Integrative experiments require a shared theoretical and methodological basis
Is generalization decay a fundamental law of psychology?
Measurement validity and the integrative approach
Neuroadaptive Bayesian optimisation can allow integrative design spaces at the individual level in the social and behavioural sciences… and beyond
Phenomena complexity, disciplinary consensus, and experimental versus correlational research in psychological science
Representative design: A realistic alternative to (systematic) integrative design
Sampling complex social and behavioral phenomena
Some problems with zooming out as scientific reform
Test many theories in many ways
The elephant's other legs: What some sciences actually do
The future of experimental design: Integrative, but is the sample diverse enough?
The miss of the framework
The social sciences needs more than integrative experimental designs: We need better theories
There are no shortcuts to theory
Author response
Replies to commentaries on beyond playing 20 questions with nature