Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Re-Thinking Management: Insights from Western Classical Humanism

Humanistic Management: What Can We Learn from Classical Humanism?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Humanistic Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variety of theories of management and organizational studies have failed to consider the human being in his or her integrity and, thus, fall short of being humanistic. This article seeks to contribute to the recovery of a more complete view of the human being in management, learning from classical humanism developed throughout Western Civilization, from the Greek and Roman Philosophers and the Judeo-Christian legacy to the Renaissance. More specifically, it discusses several relevant aspects of this Classical humanism, which can aid in re-thinking management. These include a realistic epistemology and metaphysics, and the human being as a whole (endowed with intrinsic dignity and called to growth). Classical humanism also entails the consideration of the human action as a unity with both internal and external dimensions, ethics understood as a guide for good life, society viewed as a community of people, and being open to beauty and transcendence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, A. 2012. Personalist business ethics and humanistic management: insights from Jacques Maritain. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2): 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, H. 2010. The practical wisdom of Personalism. Journal of Management Development 29 (7/8): 697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, H., and Y. Shcherbinina. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and the common good. In Business, globalization and the common good, ed. H.-C. de Bettignies and F. Lepineux, 63–82. Oxford Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvira, R. 2006. Dimensiones estéticas de la empresa. Cuadernos Empresa y Humanismo 67: 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, W.P. 1997. Realism and the tasks of epistemology. In Realism, AntiRealism and Epistemology, ed. C.B. Kulp, 53–94. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann, W., E. Kimakowitz, M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, and C. Dierksmeier, eds. 2011. Humanistic Management in Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. 1999. Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. 1981. Summa Theologiae. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1980. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1989. Metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2012. Eudemian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2017. Politics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. 1968 [1938]. The Functions of the Executive. Introduction by K. Andrews. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Bible, The Holy. 1966. New Revised Standard Version (Catholic Edition) Princeton, NJ: Scepter.

  • Black, R. 2007. The philosopher and Renaissance culture. In The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, ed. J. Hankins, 13–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, A., and A. Code. 2012. Aristotle on Knowledge. In Epistemology: The Key Thinkers, ed. S. Hetherington, 50–71. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brague, R. 2018. The Kingdom of Man. Genesis and Failure of the Modern Project. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press. (Original. 2015. Le Règne de l’homme. Genèse et échec du projet moderne. Paris: Gallimard).

  • Brown, M. 2014. Imago Dei in Thomas Aquinas. The Saint Anselm Journal 10 (1): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calleja, R., and D. Melé. 2017. Valero’s “Enterprise Politics”: a model of humanistic management and corporate governance. Journal of Management Development 36 (5): 644–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.W., and N. Markosian. 2010. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4(16):386–405. Reprint in The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development, eds. O. E. Williamson and S. G. Winter, 61–74. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cornford, F.M. 1966. Before and after socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, R. F. 2006. The ontology of 'the economic': an Aristotelian Analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics30 (5): 767–781. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1096810 or https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei106

  • De George, R.T. 2006. The history of business Ethics. In The accountable corporation, vol. 2, ed. M.J. Epstein and K.O. Hanson. Business Ethics, 47–58. Westpoint: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T. 1987. The status of business ethics: past and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(3), 201-211. Devitt, M. 1997. Realism and Truth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2011. The freedom-responsibility nexus in management philosophy and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics101 (4): 263–283.

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2016a. Reframing economic ethics: The philosophical foundations of humanistic management. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2016b. What is ‘Humanistic’ about humanistic management? Humanistic Management Journal 1: 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. 2005. For positive management theories while retaining science: reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (1): 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcon, A. (2019). Aristotle on causality. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/aristotle-causality/

  • Fleischaker, D. P. 2016. Augustine: foundations in christian humanism. In A Companion to Medieval Christian Humanism, ed. J. P. Bequette, 10–39. Leiden: Brill.

  • Forschner, M. 2011. Stoic humanism. In Humanistic Ethics in the Age of Globality, ed. C. Dierksmeier, W. Amann, E. Kimakowitz, H. Spitzeckand M. Pirson, 49–59. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Freeman, R.E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gapper, J. 2005. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal’s “bad management theories are destroying good management practices.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (1): 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frémeaux, S., and G. Michelson. 2017. The common good of the firm and humanistic management: conscious capitalism and economy of communion. Journal of Business Ethics 145 (4): 701–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13), 32–33, 122, 126.

  • Gaus, G., Courtland, S. D. and Schmidtz, D. 2020. Liberalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/liberalism/

  • Gay, P. 1995. The enlightenment: the rise of modern paganism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geigle, D. 2012. Workplace spirituality empirical research: a literature review. Business and Management Review 2 (10): 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R.A., and C.L. Jurkiewicz. 2003. Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance. New York: M. E. Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giustiniani, V.R. 1985. Homo, humanus, and the meanings of “humanism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (2): 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grendler, P. F. 2006. Humanism: ancient learning, criticism, schools and universities. In Interpretations of Renaissance Humanism, ed.A. Mazzocco, 73–96. Leiden: Brill, 73–96.

  • Gupta, D. 2018. Implications of humanistic management for the employer and the employed. Organization and Management 4 (44): 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W.K.C. 1971. Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haack, S. 2004. Realism. In Handbook of Epistemology, ed. I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen, and J. Woleński, 415–436. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, P., and B. Harrison. 2004. Word and World: Practices and the Foundation of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, J. 2007. Humanism, scholasticism, and Renaissance philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, ed. J. Hankins, 30–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. 1982. Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.S., J.B. Barney, and R.E. Freeman. 2019. The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, B. and V. Rundshagen. 2020. Paradigm shift to implement SDG 2 (end hunger): A humanistic management lens on the education of future leaders. The International Journal of Management Education 18 (1). Article 100368. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-international-journal-of-management-education/vol/18/issue/1.

  • Hunt, S.T. 2014. Common sense talent management: using strategic human resources to improve company performance. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1994. The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7 (2): 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. 2001. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. European Financial Management 7 (3): 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1993. [1785]. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

  • Keir, J. 2017. A world ethos for humanistic management: love story or dialogue platform? Humanistic Management Journal 2 (1): 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimakowitz, E., M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, C. Dierksmeier, and W. Amann, eds. 2011. Humanistic management in practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraye, J. 2007. The revival of hellenistic philosophies. In InThe Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, ed. J. Hankins, 97–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ladkin, D. 2008. Leading beautifully: how mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. Leadership Quarterly 19 (1): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, C. 1997. The philosophy of humanism. New York: Humanist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, N. 2007. An introduction to the theory of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leontsini, E. 2013. The motive of society: Aristotle on Civic Friendship, Justice, and Concord. Res Publica19 (1): 21–25.

  • Lewis, C.S. 1991. The Four Loves. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S. 1993. Theory of Knowledge. In The cambridge companion to aquinas, ed. N. Kretzmann and E. Stump, 160–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, R. 1996. Aristotle on Civic Friendship. The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 197. Available at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/197

  • Mazzocco, A. 2006. Petrarch: Founder of Renaissance Humanism?. In Interpretations of Renaissance Humanism, ed. A.Mazzocco, 215–242. Leiden: Brill.

  • Meisinger, N. 2020. Why do firms exist? Eine theorieintegrative Konzeption ihrer Erstursachen (Why Do Firms Exist? A theory-integrative conception of their primary causes) (in German). Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Unternehmensethik 21 (1): 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2003. The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (44): 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2012. The firm as a “Community of Persons”: A Pillar of Humanistic Business Ethos. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D., and C. Dierksmeier. 2012. Human development in business: Values and humanistic management in the Encyclical Caritas in Veritate. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2013. Antecedents and current situation of humanistic management. African Journal of Business Ethics 7 (2): 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé D. and C. González Cantón. 2014. human foundations of management. understanding the Homo Humanus. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Melé, D. 2016. Understanding humanistic management. Humanistic Management Journal 1 (1): 33-55.

  • Melé, D. 2018. Christian ethics. In The Sage Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, ed. R.W. Kolb, 465–468. Chicago: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2019). business ethics in action. managing human excellence in organizations. 2nd Edition, Revised and Extended. London: Red Globe Press.

  • Melena, S. 2018. Supportive accountability: how to inspire people and improve performance. La Mesa, CA: Melena Consulting Group.

  • Murphy, J. B. 1993. The moral economy of labor. aristotelian themes in economic theory. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

  • Nida-Ruemelin, J. 2009. Philosophical grounds of humanism in economics. In Humanism in Business: Perspectives on the Development of a Responsible Business Society, ed. H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, and E. von Kimakowitz, 15–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. 2002. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, L. 2018. Menstruation and humanistic management at work: The development and implementation of a menstrual workplace policy. Journal of the Association for Management Education and Development 25 (4): 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. 2005. Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (1): 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinn, A.B. 2014. Humanism as guide to life meaning. In What is Humanism and Why Does it Matter?, ed. A.B. Pinn, 28–41. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pico della Mirandola, G. 2012. Oration on the dignity of man. Edited by F. Borghesi, M. Papio, and M. Riva. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pirson, M.A., and S. Turnbull. 2011. Toward a more humanistic governance model: Network governance structures. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (1): 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M., E. Kimakowitz, H. Spitzeck, C. Dierksmeier, and W. Amann, eds. 2011. Humanistic management in practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M. 2017. Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M. 2019. A humanistic perspective for management theory: Protecting dignity and promoting well-being. Journal of Business Ethics 159 (1): 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M. 2020. Humanistic management as integrally responsible management? In Research Handbook of Responsible Management, ed. O. Laasch, R. Suddaby, R.E. Freeman, and D. Jamali, 195–211. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1977a. Protagoras. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1977b. Meno. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1989. Alcibiades I. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1986. Charmides. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 2001. Gorgias. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 2005a. Apology. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 2005b. Timaeus. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 2013. Republic. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, Pope. 2015. Encyclical letter Laudato Si. Vatican City: Vatican Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, C.D.C. 2002. Substantial Knowledge: Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, H., and R. Miles. 2009. A model of collaborative entrepreneurship for a more humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (3): 445–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, W.J., C.K. Hohne, and S.B. King. 2018. Human performance improvement. Building practitioner performance. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 1992. Ethics and excellence. Cooperation and Integrity in Business. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartwell, C. 2017. Beauty. InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/beauty/.

  • Schwabenland, C., and P. Harrison. 2018. Humanistic management: An alternative way of organising? Journal of the Association for Management Education and Development 25 (4): 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach, S.A. 1996. On Civic Friendship. Ethics 107 (1): 97–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C.D. 2016. Saint Thomas Aquinas’ ontological epistemology as clarified realism: The relating of subject to object for ontological knowledge. South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (3): 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedley, D. 2017. Becoming Godlike. In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Ethics, ed. C. Bobonich, 319–337. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seneca, L. A. 1917–25. Ad Lucilium epistulae morales. Edited by Richard M. Gummere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Epistulae 95. Available at http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0080%3Aletter%3D95.

  • Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52 (2): 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. 2016. Imago Dei: Nature, Grace, and Glory According to Thomas Aquinas. In A Companion to Medieval Christian Humanism, ed. J. P. Bequette, 212–231. Leiden: Brill.

  • Simon, H.A. 1947. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solani, L. 2017. Freedom management: How leaders can stay afloat in the sea of social connections. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H. 2011. An Integrated model of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (1): 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. 2010. Aesthetic understanding of work and organizational life: Approaches and research developments. Sociology Compass 4 (10): 880–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. 2006[1911]. The principles of scientific management. New York: Cosimo.

  • Taylor, S.S., and H. Hansen. 2005. Finding form: looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies 42 (6): 1211–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. 2018. Theory of the Firm. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, eds. M. Augier and D. J. Teece. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Tołłoczko, T. 2007. Homo Homini Res Sacra “Man is a sacred thing for man.” Dialogue and Universalism 17 (7/8): 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, L. 2003. God, humanism, and philosophy. In The Case for Humanism. An Introduction, ed. A. Dacey, and L. Vaughn,157–188.New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

  • Vigo, A. 2008. Praxis como modo de ser del hombre. La concepción aristotélica de la acción racional. In Filosofía de la acción. Un análisis histórico-sistemático de la acción y la racionalidad práctica en los clásicos de la filosofía, ed. G. Leyva, 53–85. México D. F: Síntesis.

  • Voigt, G. 1960. Die Wiederbelebung des classischen Alterthumsoder das erste Jahrhundert des Humanismus. 2 vols. Berlin: G. Reimer.

  • Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. 2018. For humanistic management and against economics. Business and Society Review 123 (3): 459–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warke, T. 2000. Mathematical fitness in the evolution of the utility concept from Bentham to Jevons to Marshall. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. 2007. Presocratics. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. 2008. Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies 29 (4): 559–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody, D. P. M. 2013. Aesthetic. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece, ed. N. Wilson. New York: Routledge.

  • Williamson, O.E., ed. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1990. A comparison of alternative approaches to economic organization. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146 (1): 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S. 2020. The common good as principle for business. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 17 (1): 49–74.

  • Zawadzki, M. 2018. Dignity in the workplace. The perspective of humanistic management. Central European Management Journal 26 (1): 171–188.

  • Zimnoch, K. and B. Mazur (2017/2018). Humanistic and economic management. The case of the cooperatives of the disabled in Poland. Journal of Management & Change 36/37 (1/2): 68–77.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Immaculada, 22, 08017, Barcelona, Spain

    Vianney Domingo

  2. IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Av. Pearson, 21, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Vianney Domingo & Domènec Melé

Authors
  1. Vianney Domingo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Domènec Melé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vianney Domingo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domingo, V., Melé, D. Re-Thinking Management: Insights from Western Classical Humanism. Humanist Manag J 7, 1–21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-021-00115-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-021-00115-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation