Skip to main content
Log in

Professional liability (malpractice) coverage of humanist scholars functioning as clinical medical ethicists

  • Published:
The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to theoretical discussions about potential professional liability of clinical ethicists, this report gives the results of empirical data gathered in a national survey of clinical medical ethicists. The report assesses the types of activities of clinical ethicists, the extent and types of their professional liability coverage, and the influence that concerns about legal liability has on how they function as clinical ethicists. In addition demographic data on age, sex, educational background, etc. are reported. The results show that while nearly one third (28.9%) of the ethicists regularly make recommendations about patient care, only 10.8% of them regularly make entries in the medical record; only approximately half (53.0%) of them are covered by professional liability (malpractice) insurance; and the vast majority (84.3%) of them say that concerns about legal liability do not influence the way they function as clinical ethicists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  1. Pellegrino, E.D. and McElhinney, T.K.Teaching Ethics, the Humanities, and Human Values in Medical Schools: A Ten-year Overview. Washington, D.C.: Society for Health and Human Values, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McElhinney, T.K. (Ed).Human Values Teaching Programs for Health Professionals. Ardmore, Pennsylvania: Whitmore Publishing Co., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Culver, C.M., et al. Basic Curricular Goals in Medical Ethics.New Engl. J. Med., 312:253–256, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Howe, K.R. and Jones, M.S. Techniques for Evaluating Student Performance in a Preclinical Medical Ethics Course.J. Med. Educ., 59:530–532, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siegler, M., Rezler, A.G., and Connell, K.J. Using Simulated Case Studies to Evaluate a Clinical Ethics Course for Junior Students.J. Med. Educ., 57:380–385, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kegeles, S.M., Jonsen, A.R., and Jameton, A. A Course for Senior Medical Students in the Responsibilities of Medical Practice.J. Med. Educ., 60:876–878, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sundance, P., Grant, I., and Moser, K. Integration of the Social and Behavioral Sciences into the Core Medicine Clerkship.J. Med. Educ., 60:881–883, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cassidy, R.C., Swee, D.E., and Stuart, M.R. Teaching Biopsycho-Ethical Medicine in a Family Practice Clerkship.J. Med. Educ., 58:773–783, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boufford, J.I., and Carson, R.A. (Project Directors),The Teaching of Humanities and Human Values in Primary Care Residency Training: Resource Book. Society for Health and Human Values. McLean, Virginia: SHHV, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Self, D.J., Lyon-Loftus, G.T. A Model for Teaching Ethics in Family Medicine Residency.J. Family Pract. 355–9, 1983.

  11. Blurton, R.R. and Mazzaferri, E.L. Assessment of Interpersonal Skills and Humanistic Qualities in Medical Residents.J. Med. Educ., 60:648–650, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, T., Self, D.J. Medical Ethics Programs in Family Practice Residencies.Fam Med. 17:99–102, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Skeel, J.D. and Self, D.J. Ethics in the Clinical Setting.Ethics Consultation in Health Care, ed. by John Fletcher, Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press. (in press).

  14. Bickel, Janet.Integrating Human Values Teaching Programs Into Medical Students' Clinical Education. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Self, D. and Skeel, J. Potential Roles of the Medical Ethicist in the Clinical Setting.Theoretical Medicine, 7:33–39, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Areen, Judith. Legal Implications of Ethics Consultation.Ethics Consultations in Health Care, ed. John Fletcher (Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press), in press.

  17. Wolf, Susan M. Ethics Committees in the Courts.Hastings Center Report, Vol. 16, No. 3 (June 1986):12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson, John A. Clinical Medical Ethics and the Law: The Rights and Duties of Ethics Consultants.Ethics Consultations in Health Care, ed. John Fletcher (Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press), in press.

  19. Craig-Clark, Dianne. Bouvia Names Ethics Committee Members in Malpractice Suit.Medical Ethics Adviser, Vol. 2, No. 12 (December 1986):153–155.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skeel, Joy D. and Donnie J. Self. A Description of the Roles of Humanist Scholars in the Clinical Setting. Unpublished manuscript.

  21. Self, Donnie J., and Joy D. Skeel. Legal Liability and Clinical Ethics Consultations: Practical and Philosophical Considerations.Medical Ethics: A Guide for Health Professionals, eds. John Monagle and David Thomasma (Rockville, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.):408–416, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Merritt, Andrew L. The Tort Liability of Hospital Ethics Committees.Southern California Law Review, 60:1239–1297, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Self, D.J., Skeel, J.D. Professional liability (malpractice) coverage of humanist scholars functioning as clinical medical ethicists. J Med Hum 9, 101–110 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139235

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139235

Keywords

Navigation